Litteraturstudie - Tidligfasevurdering av prosjekter - Concept - NTNU

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CONCEPTFront-end Management of Major ProjectsSikring av store investeringsprosjekterTwo types of risk which could occur in a project can be large catastrophic ecentcausing major delays in project completion, or small allmost imperceptible, delaysthat accumulate over the life of the project to result in significant delay in projectcompletion. This paper primarily deals with the second group jfo many small delays.This paper also deals with with the favorable random outcomes called opportunitiesthat are frequently overlooked and whose benefits are lost.Pritchard, C. L., Risk Management: Concepts and Guidance, Second Edition, ISBN 1-89036-730-3, ESI International, USA, 2001.This book provides you with practical advice that can be put to use the minute you putthe book down. The book give introduction to Risk Processes and Risk ManagementTechniques.Project Mentors Inc., Project Management Estimating & Risk Management, CD-ROM, USA,1997.Project Estimating & Risk Management CBT is a four-to-six hour multimediaprogram that covers twelve lessons in Project Estimating & Risk Management.Participants will learn such key elements as the estimating process, tactical estimatingtechniques, risk identification and risk and response control.Rafterty, Risk Analysis in Project Management, University of Greenwich, UK, E & FN Spon,ISBN 0-419-18420-1, London, UK, 1994.This book will demistify risk analysis and enable decision makers to improve thequality of their judgement by providing more realistic information on which to basedecisions. Using a practical approach, minimal jargon, mathematics and academicreferences, the author porvides practitioners with clear descriptions of the nature ofrisk and risk attitude. He also describes techniques of analysis and assesses theirstrengths and weaknesses. Case studies and worked examples are used to demonstratehow the techniques may be used to carry out sophisticated risk analyses on a widerange of projects.Rausand, Marvin, Risikoanalyse - Veiledning til NS 5814, Tapir, ISBN 82-519-0970-8, 1991.Boken er først og fremst rettet mot personer som ønsker en innføring i de ulikemetodene som benyttes innen risikoanalyse. I tillegg til de mest benyttede metodeneinnen risikoanalyse er det tatt med et kapittel som beskriver risikoanalysens plass isikkerhetsstyring.Raz & Michael, Benchmarking the Use of Project Risk Management Tools, ProjectManagement Instiute 1999 Seminars & Symposium.This paper present the results of a study carried out in Israel in order to anwer whichtools within Project Risk Management that can procide the greatest benefits. Theobjective was to help project managers focus on those few critical tools and methodsthat are recognized as the key contributors to the effectivenes of the PRM process.The results of the study are presented in the paper.Raz, T. and Michael, E, Use and benefits of tools for project risk management, Faculty ofManagement, Tel Aviv University, Israel, International Journal of Project Management 19,2001.Litteraturstudium innen tidligfasevurderinger av prosjekter 66
CONCEPTFront-end Management of Major ProjectsSikring av store investeringsprosjekterRisk management is one of the key project management processes. Numerous toolsare available to support the various phases of the risk management process. Thispaper present the results of a study designed to identify the tools that are most widelyused and those that are associated with successful project management in general, andwith etfective project risk management in particular. The study is based on aquestionnaire adrninistered to a sample of project managers from the software andhigh-tech industries. The response data was analyzed in order to tind which tools aremore likely to be used in those organizations that report better project managementperformance and in those that value the contribution of risk management processes.Remer, D. S., Nieto, A., P A compendium and comparison of 25 project evaluationtechniques, Harvey Mudd College of Engineering and Science, Claremont, USA,International Journal of production economics.This two-part paper presents 25 different methods and techniques used to evaluate theeconomic desirability of projects. We categorized these 25 methods into 5 types: netpresent value methods, rate of return methods, ratio methods, payback methods, andaccounting methods. We provide insight in to the advantages and limitations of theseproject evaluation methods by comparing and contrasting them. Many examples areincluded to illustrate the use of these methods. In Part I. we exammine net presentvalue and rate of return methods. In Part 2, we exammine ratio, payback, andaccounting methods. A recap, comparison. and full summary of all 25 methods isincluded at the end of Part 2.Rodrigues, Alexandre G., Managing and Modelling Project Risk Dynamics - A SystemDynamics-based Framework, Department of Information Systems, The School ofEngineering, University of Minho, Gampus de Azurem, Portugal, Project ManagementSeminars and Symposium, PMI 1999.The fast changing environment and the complexity of projects has increased riskexposure. The PMBOK proposes a structured risk management process, integratedwithin the overall project management frarnework. However, unresolved difficultiescall for further developments in the field. In projects, risks take place within acomplex web of numerous interconnected causes and effects, which generate ciosedchains of feedback. Project risk dynamics are difficult to understand and control, andnot all types of tools and techniques are appropriate to address their systernic nature.System Dynarnics (SD), as a proven approach to project management, provides thisalternative view. A methodology to integrate the use of SD within the establishedproject management process has been proposed by the author. In this paper, this isfurther extended to integrate the use of SD modelling within the PMBOK riskmanagement process, providing a useful frarnework for rnanaging project riskdynarnics.Saleh, Mohammed, Myrtveit, Magne, Designing a rational process for risk-taking, PowersimAS, ISDC Wellington, Norge 1999.In this paper the authores attemt to invent a new way to understand risk, measure it,and weigh its consequenses. They attempt to design a rational process for risk-taking;a process that gives the system dynamicist the ability to define what may happen inthe future and then choose among alternatives.Litteraturstudium innen tidligfasevurderinger av prosjekter 67
Page 1 and 2:
Rapportnr.: CONCEPT 01-10Prosjekt:F
Page 4 and 5:
CONCEPTFront-end Management of Majo
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16: CONCEPTFront-end Management of Majo
Page 25: CONCEPTFront-end Management of Majo
Page 65: CONCEPTFront-end Management of Majo
show all

Litteraturstudie - Tidligfasevurdering av prosjekter - Concept - NTNU

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?