13.07.2015 Views

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

80 6. <strong>SOFT</strong> <strong>BIOMETRICS</strong> FOR QUANTIFYING AND PREDICTING <strong>FACIAL</strong> AESTHETICS– facial landmark recognition with accuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> 6.23 pixels and 2.1%, reported in the work[DM08],– face localization with accuracy between90% and98% depending on the database presentedin [GLW + 11] and– glasses detection with accuracy <strong>of</strong>94% shown in [WAL04].We deteriorate the manually annotated data with the above realistic algorithmic estimationaccuracies and compute the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between user MOS rating and thepredicted ̂MOS based on simulated error prone algorithms. We obtain a realistic simulated beautyprediction performance presented in Table 6.3. Such an automatic tool, based only on three traitsprovides related results that would outperform outcomes from Eigenfaces <strong>of</strong> r̂MOS,MOS) = 0.18(see [GKYG10]) and neural networks = 0.458 (see [GKYG10]).r̂MOS,MOSCombined Traits x iPearson’s correlationcoefficient r i,MOSx 1 0.5112x 1 , x 2 0.5921x 1 , x 2 , x 8 0.6165x 1 , x 2 , x 8 , x 14 , x 20 , x 23 0.6357Degraded x 1 0.4927Degraded x 1 , x 2 0.5722Degraded x 1 , x 2 , x 8 0.5810x 14 , x 20 , x 23 and degraded x 1 , x 2 , x 8 0.60076.8 SummaryIn this chapter, we presented a study on facial aesthetics in photographs, where we comparedobjective measures (namely photograph quality measures, facial beauty characteristics and s<strong>of</strong>tbiometrics), with human subjective perception. Our analysis revealed a substantial correlation betweendifferent selected traits, and the corresponding MOS-related beauty indices. Specificallywe presented that non permanent features can influence highly the MOS, and based on our analysiswe conclude that facial aesthetics in images can indeed be substantially modifiable. Withother words parameters such as the presence <strong>of</strong> makeup and glasses, the image quality as wellas different image post–processing methods can significantly affect the resulting MOS. Furthermorewe constructed a linear MOS–based metric which was successfully employed to quantifybeauty-index variations due to aging and surgery. Our work applies towards building a basis fordesigning new image-processing tools that further automate prediction <strong>of</strong> aesthetics in facial images.Towards this we provided a simulation <strong>of</strong> an automatic prediction tool based on state <strong>of</strong> theart categorization algorithms and the designed MOS–prediction metric.By now we ensured the user <strong>of</strong> the practicality <strong>of</strong> SBS for security as well as entertainmentapplications. In a next step we provide a chapter 7 featuring classification algorithms <strong>of</strong> a SBS, asemployed and analyzed in the chapters 3 and 4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!