13.07.2015 Views

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

71raphy considerations include [BSS10] and [CBNT10]. Hereby the authors reveal that appealingphotographs draw from single appealing image regions as well as their location and the authorsuse this proposition to automatically enhance photo-quality. <strong>Ph</strong>oto-quality can be also influencedby image composition, see [OSHO10]. Finally there are current studies, which model aestheticperception <strong>of</strong> videos [MOO10]. Such methods have become increasingly relevant due to the prevalence<strong>of</strong> low price consumer electronic products.6.2 ContributionIn this chapter we study the role <strong>of</strong> objective measures in modeling the way humans perceivefacial images. In establishing the results, we incorporate a new broad spectrum <strong>of</strong> known aestheticalfacial characteristics, as well as consider the role <strong>of</strong> basic image properties and photographaesthetics. This allows us to draw different conclusions on the intertwined roles <strong>of</strong> facial featuresin defining the aesthetics in female head-and-shoulder-images, as well as allows for further insighton how aesthetics can be influenced by careful modifications.Towards further quantifying such insights, we construct a basic linear metric that models therole <strong>of</strong> selected traits in affecting the way humans perceive such images. This model applies as astep towards an automatic and holistic prediction <strong>of</strong> facial aesthetics in images.The study provides quantitative insight on how basic measures can be used to improve photographsfor CVs or for different social and dating websites. This helps create an objective viewon subjective efforts by experts / journalists when retouching images. We use the gained objectiveview to examine facial aesthetics in terms <strong>of</strong> aging, facial surgery and a comparison <strong>of</strong> averagefemales relatively to selected females known for their beauty.The novelty in here lies mainly in two aspects. The first one is that we expand the pool <strong>of</strong> facialfeatures to include non permanent features such as make-up, presence <strong>of</strong> glasses, or hair-style. Thesecond novelty comes from the fact that we seek to combine the results <strong>of</strong> both research areas, thusto jointly study and understand the role <strong>of</strong> facial features and <strong>of</strong> image processing states.6.3 Study <strong>of</strong> aesthetics in facial photographsIn our study we consider 37 different characteristics that include facial proportions and traits,facial expressions, as well as image properties. All these characteristics are, manually or automaticallyextracted from a database <strong>of</strong> 325 facial images. The greater part <strong>of</strong> the database, 260images, is used for training purposes and further 65 images are tested for the related validation.Each image is associated with human ratings for attractiveness, as explained in Section 6.3.1. Thedatabase forms the empirical base for the further study on how different features and propertiesrelate to attractiveness.We proceed with the details <strong>of</strong> the database and related characteristics.6.3.1 DatabaseThe database consists <strong>of</strong> 325 randomly downloaded head-and-shoulders images from the website HOTorNOT [Hot11]. HOTorNOT has been previously used in image processing studies(see [GKYG10] [SBHJ10]), due to the sufficiently large library <strong>of</strong> images, and the related ratingsand demographic information.Each image depicts a young female subject (see for example Fig. 6.3 and Fig. 6.4.) and wasrated by a multitude <strong>of</strong> users <strong>of</strong> the web site. The rating, on a scale <strong>of</strong> one to ten, corresponds to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!