13.07.2015 Views

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50 4. SEARCH PRUNING IN VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMSWe proceed to analyze these issues and first recall that for a given authentication group v,the categorization algorithm identifies set S <strong>of</strong> all unpruned subjects, defined as S = {v ∈ v :Ĉ(v) = 1}. We are here interested in the size <strong>of</strong> the search after pruning, specifically in theparameterτ := |S| , 0 ≤ τ ≤ ρ, (4.10)n/ρwhich represents 2 a relative deviation <strong>of</strong> |S| from a baseline n/ρ. It can be seen that the typical,i.e., common, value <strong>of</strong>τ is (see also Section 4.5.1)|S|ρ∑τ 0 := E vn/ρ = ρ p f ɛ f . (4.11)We are now interested in the entire tail behavior (not just the typical part <strong>of</strong> it), i.e., we are interestedin understanding the probability <strong>of</strong> having an authentication groupvthat results in atypicallyunhelpful pruning (τ > τ 0 ), or atypically helpful pruning (τ < τ 0 ).Towards this letα 0,f (v) := |C f|n/ρ , (4.12)let a 0 (v) = {α 0,f (v)} ρ f=1describe the instantaneous normalized distribution (histogram) <strong>of</strong>{|C f |} ρ f=1for the specific, randomly chosen and fixed authentication group v, and letf=1p := {p f } ρ f=1 = {E |C f |vn }ρ f=1 , (4.13)denote the normalized statistical population distribution <strong>of</strong> {|C f |} ρ f=1 .Furthermore, for a given v, letα 1,f (v) := |C f ∩S|, 0 ≤ α 1,f ≤ ρ, (4.14)n/ρlet α 1 (v) := {a 1,f (v)} ρ f=1 , and α(v) := {α 0(v),α 1 (v)}, and let 3V(τ) := { 0 ≤ α 1,f ≤ min(τ,α 0,f ),ρ∑α 1,f = τ } , (4.15)denote the set <strong>of</strong> valid α for a given τ, i.e., describe the set <strong>of</strong> all possible authentication groupsand categorization errors that can result in|S| = τ n ρ .Given the information that α 1 has on α 0 , given that τ is implied by α 1 , and given that thealgorithms here categorize a subject independently <strong>of</strong> other subjects, it can be seen that for anyα ∈ V(τ), it is the case thatf=1P(α,τ) = P(α 0 ,α 1 ) = P(α 0 )P(α 1 |α 0 ) (4.16)ρ∏ ρ∏= P(α 0,f ) P(α 1,f |α 0,f ). (4.17)f=12. Note the small change in notation compared to Section 4.2. This change is meant to make the derivations moreconcise.3. For simplicity <strong>of</strong> notation we will henceforth use α 0,α 1,α,α 0,f ,α 1,f and let the association tov be impliedf=1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!