13.07.2015 Views

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

472.52rate <strong>of</strong> decay <strong>of</strong> P(τ)1.510.500.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9τ = (remaining size)/nFigure 4.3: Asymptotic rate <strong>of</strong> decay <strong>of</strong> P(|S| > τn), for ρ = 3, reliability 0.8, populationstatistics p 1 = 0.4,p 2 = 0.25,p 3 = 0.35 and confusability parameters ɛ 2 = 0.2,ɛ 3 = 0.3.note that the probability that pruning removes less than 1−0.62 = 38% <strong>of</strong> the original set,is approximately given by e −n/2 . The probability that pruning removes less than half theelements is approximately P(τ > 0.5) ≈ e −n/10 .The expressions from the above graphs will be derived in detail later.4.3 Gain vs. reliability in s<strong>of</strong>t biometric systemsAs an intermediate measure <strong>of</strong> efficiency we consider the (instantaneous) pruning gain, definedhere asG(v) := n|S| , (4.2)which simply describes 1 the size reduction, from v to S, and which can vary from 1 (no pruninggain) to n. In terms <strong>of</strong> system design, one could also consider the relative gain,r(v) := 1− |S|n∈ [0,1], (4.3)describing the fraction <strong>of</strong> people in v that was pruned out.It is noted here that G(v), and by extension r(v), vary randomly with, among other things, therelationship between v and v ′ , the current estimation conditions as well as the error capabilities<strong>of</strong> the system. For example, we note that if v and v ′ are such that v ′ belongs in a category inwhich very few other members <strong>of</strong>v belong to, then the SBS-based pruning is expected to producea very smallS and a high gain. If though, at the same time, the estimation capabilities (algorithmsand hardware) <strong>of</strong> the system result in the characteristics <strong>of</strong> v ′ being easily confusable with thecharacteristics <strong>of</strong> another populous category in v, then S will be generally larger, and the gainsmaller.As a result, any reasonable analysis <strong>of</strong> the gain-reliability behavior must be <strong>of</strong> a statisticalnature and must naturally reflect the categorization refinement, the corresponding estimation errorcapabilities <strong>of</strong> the system, as well as the statistics <strong>of</strong> the larger population.1. We here assume that the SBS is asked to leave at least one subject inS.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!