13.07.2015 Views

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

40 3. BAG OF <strong>FACIAL</strong> <strong>SOFT</strong> <strong>BIOMETRICS</strong> FOR HUMAN IDENTIFICATION– Quantification error: the discrete values <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t biometric traits are mapped onto a limitedamount <strong>of</strong> bins and cause such an error. A lower amount <strong>of</strong> bins corresponds to less misclassificationsat the cost though <strong>of</strong> decreasing distinctiveness <strong>of</strong> this trait, as elaboratedabove.– The nomenclature <strong>of</strong> traits varies and is ambiguous. For example a hair color that might bedenoted with "red" can be labeled by different subjects as a variety <strong>of</strong> synonyms: auburn,orange, copper, reddish; but also as a completely different trait e.g. brown. A related studyestablishing labels for s<strong>of</strong>t biometric traits with the Mechanical Turk was recently conductedby the authors in [CO11].– Different people perceive different traits (e.g. colors) differently. Specifically if the witness<strong>of</strong> a crime has a different color understanding than the SBS performing the search it canlead to an erroneous search. This aspect though can be minimized if the witness is asked topoint at reference colors than just human labeling.– The awareness <strong>of</strong> people can be bad or wrong in how they remember traits.– Often occurring mixed categories like red-brown for hair color can be challenging for all,human perception, the SBS - training and - classification step.To visualize just the quantification error introduced by a human understandable SBS we havethe following simulation. We display in Figure 3.8 on the one hand purely the collision probability<strong>of</strong> subjects with 8 quantification bins(=traits instances) <strong>of</strong> hair color (light blond, dark blond, red,brown, black, grey, white and bald). On the other hand we have the re–identification <strong>of</strong> non–quantified and discrete computer–to–computer search. It is <strong>of</strong> interest, that even in the presence <strong>of</strong>an estimation error the over all error probability is decreased in the absence <strong>of</strong> quantification error.A full computer–to–computer is presented in Chapter 5 and specifically in Figure 5.4, where theperformance <strong>of</strong> a SBS employing AdaBoost [FHT98] boosted algorithms for hair, skin and clothscolor, their textures and patch histograms is illustrated. The system is used for frontal–to–sidere–identification.10.90.80.7P err0.60.50.40.3Error probability <strong>of</strong> non−quantification, estimation error prone re−identificationCollision probability <strong>of</strong> 8−bin−quantified re−identification0.22 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20Subjects NFigure 3.8: Re–identification error for hair color in ann-sized authentication group.3.6 SummaryIn this chapter we explored the use <strong>of</strong> multi-trait SBSs for human identification, studying analyticallythe relationship between an authentication group v, its size n, the featured categories ρ,and the effective categories F . Then we proceeded to show that in the interference limited setting,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!