13.07.2015 Views

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

15event <strong>of</strong> collision, which is <strong>of</strong> significant character when employing SBSs for person identification.Furthermore we introduce the number <strong>of</strong> effective categories F which is later identified as animportant parameter related to collision, and is shown to directly affect the overall performance <strong>of</strong>an SBS.Section 3.5.2 analyzes the statistical distribution and mean <strong>of</strong>F and furthermore Section 3.5.3<strong>of</strong>fers an insight regarding the bounds <strong>of</strong> the statistical behavior <strong>of</strong>F over large populations. Thesebounds address the following practical question: if more funds are spent towards increasing thequality <strong>of</strong> an SBS, then what reliability gains do we expect to see? The answer and further intuitionon the above bounds are provided in Section 3.5.3.1, the pro<strong>of</strong>s can be found in the Appendix 3.In Section 3.5.4 we examine the influence <strong>of</strong> algorithmic estimation errors and give an exampleon the overall performance <strong>of</strong> a realistic SBS. We improve the performance by a study <strong>of</strong> thedistribution between population in the overall categories, see Section 3.5.4.1. We then proceed inSection 3.5.4.2 to elaborate on the human compliant aspect <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t biometrics in re–identification,hereby specifically on the quantification <strong>of</strong> traits and on the human interaction view <strong>of</strong> an SBS.Chapter 4 - Search pruning in video surveillance systemsIn Chapter 4 we explore the application using s<strong>of</strong>t-biometric related categorization-based pruningto narrow down a large search.In recent years we have experienced an increasing need to structure and organize an exponentiallyexpanding volume <strong>of</strong> images and videos. Crucial to this effort is the <strong>of</strong>ten computationallyexpensive task <strong>of</strong> algorithmic search for specific elements placed at unknown locations inside largedata sets. To limit computational cost, s<strong>of</strong>t biometrics pruning can be used, to quickly eliminate aportion <strong>of</strong> the initial data, an action which is then followed by a more precise and complex searchwithin the smaller subset <strong>of</strong> the remaining data. Such pruning methods can substantially speed upthe search, at the risk though <strong>of</strong> missing the target due to classification errors, thus reducing theoverall reliability. We are interested in analyzing this speed vs. reliability trade<strong>of</strong>f, and we focuson the realistic setting where the search is time-constrained and where, as we will see later on, theenvironment in which the search takes place is stochastic, dynamically changing, and can causesearch errors. In our setting a time constrained search seeks to identify a subject from a large set<strong>of</strong> individuals. In this scenario, a set <strong>of</strong> subjects can be pruned by means <strong>of</strong> categorization that isbased on different combinations <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t biometric traits such as facial color, shapes or measurements.We clarify that we limit our use <strong>of</strong> “pruning the search” to refer to the categorization andsubsequent elimination <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t biometric-based categories, within the context <strong>of</strong> a search withinlarge databases (Figure 4.1). In the context <strong>of</strong> this work, the elimination or filtering our <strong>of</strong> theemployed categories is based on the s<strong>of</strong>t biometric characteristics <strong>of</strong> the subjects. The pruneddatabase can be subsequently processed by humans or by a biometric such as face recognition.Towards analyzing the pruning behavior <strong>of</strong> such SBSs, Chapter 4 introduces the concept <strong>of</strong>pruning gain which describes, as a function <strong>of</strong> pruning reliability, the multiplicative reduction<strong>of</strong> the set size after pruning. For example a pruning gain <strong>of</strong> 2 implies that pruning managed tohalve the size <strong>of</strong> the original set. Section 4.5.1 provides average case analysis <strong>of</strong> the pruning gain,as a function <strong>of</strong> reliability, whereas Section 4.5 provides atypical-case analysis, <strong>of</strong>fering insighton how <strong>of</strong>ten pruning fails to be sufficiently helpful. In the process we provide some intuitionthrough examples on topics such as, how the system gain-reliability performance suffers withincreasing confusability <strong>of</strong> categories, or on whether searching for a rare looking subject rendersthe search performance more sensitive to increases in confusability, than searching for commonlooking subjects.In Section 4.6.1 we take a more practical approach and present nine different s<strong>of</strong>t biometric

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!