FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP FACIAL SOFT BIOMETRICS - Library of Ph.D. Theses | EURASIP

theses.eurasip.org
from theses.eurasip.org More from this publisher
13.07.2015 Views

13Table 2: Table of Facial soft biometric traitsSB trait Algorithm DatabaseSkin color Deduced from [KMB] FERETHair color Deduced from [ZSH08] FERETEye color Own developed UBIRIS2Beard Own developed FERETMoustache Own developed FERETGlasses Deduced from [JBAB00] FERETFigure 6: ROI for the set of facial soft biometrics. Outlier filtering was a function of the standarddeviation σ and the meanµfor each of the H,S and V parameters.estimation algorithms are featured, along with the related experimental results. We then proceedto focus on eye color as a soft biometric trait and examine an automatic eye color classifier inchallenging conditions, such as changing illumination, presence of glasses and camera sensors.User acceptance study relating to soft biometricsFinally we conclude with a usability study that verifies the user acceptance of SBSs, specificallywhen compared to existing PIN or fingerprint access control systems.The pervasiveness of biometric systems, and the corresponding growth of the biometric marketsee [usa11a], has successfully capitalized on the strength of biometric-based methods in accuratelyand effectively identifying individuals. As a result, modern state-of-the-art intrusion detection andsecurity systems include by default at least one biometric trait. It is the case though that little emphasishas been given to better understanding user-acceptance and user-preference regarding suchsystems. Existing usability related works, such as in [CAJ03] and [LBCK03], focus on establishingfunctional issues in existing ATM machines, or on studying the influence of user interactionon the performance of fingerprint based systems (see [KED11]) and interfaces (see [RJMAS09]).Other interesting works (see [usa11b], [CG05], [CJMR09]), analyze possible methods that improveinterface design. Our emphasis here is on providing insight on the attitudes and experiencesof users towards novel and emerging biometric verification methods, and to explore whether suchnovel biometric technologies can be, in terms of user acceptance, valid alternatives to existingprevalent PIN based systems. Our focus, in addition to considering the traditional PIN-basedmethod, is to explore the usability aspects of systems based on classical biometrics such as fingerprintand face recognition, and to then proceed to study the usability of systems based on theemerging class of soft-biometric methods. Our evaluation is based on having the users rate andrank their experiences with different access methods.

14We briefly describe the user test setting, as well as the conditions and the performed test procedures.We then proceed to elaborate on the chosen verification methods and on the designedinterfaces. We present the results obtained from the user study, in terms of evaluation and quantificationof the different usability measurement characteristics. We provide the user test outcomesof direct comparisons between the four presented methods. Finally we draw connections to othersignificant traits such as cost efficiency, accuracy and processing speed, see Figure 7.Figure 7: Comparison of fingerprint (FP), face recognition and PIN based access control systems.We finally note that this dissertation is supported by different journal and conference publications,which are not cited throughout the thesis, but which are listed in full in Appendix ??.Future WorkIt is becoming apparent that surveillance will increasingly affect our quality of life and security.Research in this area has been embraced by both academia and industry. For this reason,security related biometric systems will become larger and more dynamic. We see the area of softbiometrics having from now on a solid position in such systems. Towards this we will need betterunderstanding of the component parts of such SBSs, and a corresponding better understanding ofnovel trait classification algorithms, as well as novel ways of combining and analyzing such algorithms.Our aim will be to allow for more efficient SBSs, but also develop a rigorous understandingof the capabilities and limits of such systems.Our aim in the future will also be, in addition to developing novel algorithms for SBSs, to alsoidentify and develop new commercial applications that can benefit by the power of soft biometrics.

13Table 2: Table <strong>of</strong> Facial s<strong>of</strong>t biometric traitsSB trait Algorithm DatabaseSkin color Deduced from [KMB] FERETHair color Deduced from [ZSH08] FERETEye color Own developed UBIRIS2Beard Own developed FERETMoustache Own developed FERETGlasses Deduced from [JBAB00] FERETFigure 6: ROI for the set <strong>of</strong> facial s<strong>of</strong>t biometrics. Outlier filtering was a function <strong>of</strong> the standarddeviation σ and the meanµfor each <strong>of</strong> the H,S and V parameters.estimation algorithms are featured, along with the related experimental results. We then proceedto focus on eye color as a s<strong>of</strong>t biometric trait and examine an automatic eye color classifier inchallenging conditions, such as changing illumination, presence <strong>of</strong> glasses and camera sensors.User acceptance study relating to s<strong>of</strong>t biometricsFinally we conclude with a usability study that verifies the user acceptance <strong>of</strong> SBSs, specificallywhen compared to existing PIN or fingerprint access control systems.The pervasiveness <strong>of</strong> biometric systems, and the corresponding growth <strong>of</strong> the biometric marketsee [usa11a], has successfully capitalized on the strength <strong>of</strong> biometric-based methods in accuratelyand effectively identifying individuals. As a result, modern state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art intrusion detection andsecurity systems include by default at least one biometric trait. It is the case though that little emphasishas been given to better understanding user-acceptance and user-preference regarding suchsystems. Existing usability related works, such as in [CAJ03] and [LBCK03], focus on establishingfunctional issues in existing ATM machines, or on studying the influence <strong>of</strong> user interactionon the performance <strong>of</strong> fingerprint based systems (see [KED11]) and interfaces (see [RJMAS09]).Other interesting works (see [usa11b], [CG05], [CJMR09]), analyze possible methods that improveinterface design. Our emphasis here is on providing insight on the attitudes and experiences<strong>of</strong> users towards novel and emerging biometric verification methods, and to explore whether suchnovel biometric technologies can be, in terms <strong>of</strong> user acceptance, valid alternatives to existingprevalent PIN based systems. Our focus, in addition to considering the traditional PIN-basedmethod, is to explore the usability aspects <strong>of</strong> systems based on classical biometrics such as fingerprintand face recognition, and to then proceed to study the usability <strong>of</strong> systems based on theemerging class <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t-biometric methods. Our evaluation is based on having the users rate andrank their experiences with different access methods.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!