Anna Paszkowska-RogaczEnglish /Scientific PaperApplications <strong>of</strong> Kelly's personal construct theory to vocational guidanceAbstract<strong>The</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> this presentation is to outline chosen applications <strong>of</strong> Personal Construct <strong>The</strong>ory (1955) andthe Repertory Grid Technique to vocational guidance and to check its reliability. <strong>The</strong> research group(N=136, F=85, M=51, mean age=21.97) contained <strong>of</strong> students from colleges <strong>of</strong> the city <strong>of</strong>Lodz (Poland). <strong>The</strong> Repertory Grid and the Vocational Orientation Questionnaire (Job-6) based onHolland theory (Retowski, 2007) were used in the study designed to compare a vocational constructsystem and Holland Personality Types. First, the results <strong>of</strong> Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social,Enterprising, and Conventional scales were calculated. <strong>The</strong>n, to asses personal constructs theresearcher presented in the same order the same set <strong>of</strong> twelve vocational elements (one pair <strong>of</strong>occupations’ names represented one orientation <strong>of</strong> the RIASEC model) to each subject. <strong>The</strong> elementswere identical to create possibility to aggregate the different meanings <strong>of</strong> personal constructs. Aperson was asked to consider three occupations at a time and to indicate any way in which two <strong>of</strong> thisoccupations as alike in some way, but different from the third. This response created six dimensions(personal constructs) which were rated by the individual on the 5-point scale from 1 (occupation forme) to 5 (occupation not for me). <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> Repertory Grid and the Vocational OrientationQuestionnaire (Job-6) were analyzed and visualized with the Multidimensional Scaling method (MDS).Standardized Residual Sum <strong>of</strong> Squares presented good index <strong>of</strong> fit (1% to 4%). Results matched thetheoretical expected positions <strong>of</strong> elements in 3-dimensional space and they formed the structure withthe order <strong>of</strong> the Holland model. <strong>The</strong> study concludes that Personal Construct <strong>The</strong>ory provides resultscomplementary to methods based on questionnaires. It should be concerned as a very usefulframework for vocational guidance and can be used to help <strong>org</strong>anize individuals’ framework for careerdecision making, assisting them in articulating their occupations values and exploring their vocationalpreferences.About the presenterDesignation:Organization:Contact Information:email:Language:Type <strong>of</strong> Presentation:Senior LecturerFoundation for Implementation <strong>of</strong> Social Programs, University <strong>of</strong> Lodz.92-547 Lodz, ul. Bartoka 9 m 31, Poland.paszkow@uni.lodz.plEnglishScientific PaperAnna Paszkowska-Rogacz, holds a PhD in Humanistic Science, and Master degree in Psychology. She is an expert in the area<strong>of</strong> career development facilitating, and scientific worker at the Section <strong>of</strong> Occupational Psychology and Career Counselling <strong>of</strong>the Institute <strong>of</strong> Psychology at the University <strong>of</strong> Lodz, Poland. Her background includes counseling work for educationalinstitutions and social welfare. She is the head <strong>of</strong> the postgraduate studies in ‘Career Counselling’, and social competencetrainer. She is the Author, co-author and editor <strong>of</strong> about 100 published works including research reports, articles and books. Sheis the Content co-ordinator <strong>of</strong> ten Leonardo da Vinci and Grundvig international projects. She is a member <strong>of</strong> the PolishPsychological Society, the Polish Association for Career Counselors, and the International Association for Educational andVocational Guidance.14IAEVG-Jiva Conference, India, 2010
Anuradha Bakshi, Shweta Lakhwara & Akshada ChitreEnglish / Scientific PaperCareer goals <strong>of</strong> B.Sc. and M.Sc. human development alumnae <strong>of</strong> the NirmalaNiketan College <strong>of</strong> Home Science, Mumbai: Importance, achievement andsatisfactionAbstractHome Science education has kept pace with changing women’s roles, moving from an exclusive focuson the home to careers outside the home. Students specialise for entry into specific careers; HumanDevelopment, one <strong>of</strong> the specialisations, helps students prepare for careers in varied human servicesettings. In this study, the career goals <strong>of</strong> 30 B.Sc. and 30 M.Sc. Human Development alumnae <strong>of</strong> theNirmala Niketan College <strong>of</strong> Home Science (Mumbai) are examined. <strong>The</strong> 60 women who graduatedfrom the college during 1997-2009, completed an open-ended question and a 39-item, internallyconsistentrating scale. Each item on the rating scale represented a career goal (e.g., startingsomething <strong>of</strong> my own/entrepreneurship, having a pr<strong>of</strong>essionally competitive salary) and was rated forimportance, achievement, and satisfaction on a 5-point scale, with 5 referring to “extraordinarilyimportant”, “achieved to a very large extent” and “extremely satisfied” respectively. Most importantcareer goals <strong>of</strong> the Ex-B.Sc. students dentified through open-ended inquiry included gainingrecognition in their careers, pursuing further education, and starting their career again after marriage;whereas those <strong>of</strong> the ex-M.Sc.s included starting their own venture, getting a PhD, maintaining abalance between work and family, and making a name as a researcher. Mean importance rating percareer goal was high, ranging from 3.80 to 4.70 for ex-B.Sc.s; and 3.70 to 4.77 for ex-M.Sc.s.Achievement ratings for career goals were lower for both groups but more so for ex-B.Sc.s, rangingfrom 1.73 to 2.93 for ex-B.Sc.s, and 2.20 to 4.10 for ex-M.Sc.s. Satisfaction ratings were similar toachievement ratings and ranged from 2.17 to 3.23 for ex-B.Sc.s, and 2.63 to 4.17 for ex-M.Sc.s. <strong>The</strong>total scores for importance, achievement and satisfaction with regard to career goals theoreticallyranged from 39 to 195, with a theoretical midpoint <strong>of</strong> 117. Ex-B.Sc.s and ex-M.Sc.s did not differ in theextent to which they found career goals important (z=-0.6, nonsignificant); both group means weresignificantly higher than the theoretical midpoint. However, the extent <strong>of</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> career goalswas significantly higher in the ex-M.Sc.s (mean 138.17) than the ex-B.Sc.s (mean 96.40) (z=4.55,p=.00). Likewise, the extent <strong>of</strong> satisfaction with career goals was significantly higher in the ex-M.Sc.s(mean 140.23) than the ex-B.Sc.s (mean 105.13) (z=3.87, p=.00). Implications for career developmentare discussed.About the presentersContact Information:email:Language:Type <strong>of</strong> Presentation:49 New Marine Lines, Mumbai 400020, India.anustra@gmail.comEnglishScientific PaperAnuradha Bakshi is a Reader Designate at the Nirmala Niketan College <strong>of</strong> Home Science, University <strong>of</strong> Mumbai. She hascompleted her PhD from the University <strong>of</strong> Tennessee at Knoxville, USA, and her master’s degree from the Maharaja SayajiraoUniversity <strong>of</strong> Baroda. She has also taught at both her alma mater universities and at the Nirmala Niketan College <strong>of</strong> Social Work,University <strong>of</strong> Mumbai. Her research career began as an undergraduate student and has spanned over two decades in variedareas such as resiliency, education, and spirituality. As one <strong>of</strong> the senior-most faculty in Niketan, she has served as aDepartment Head (2004-2007). She is teaching students in the B.Sc., M.Sc., and PhD Home Science programs. She haspresented papers at international conferences; last year she chaired a session on research in Human Development at aninternational conference. She is a consultant in multiple areas such as Research Methods and Statistics, and HumanDevelopment. Student support and welfare is one <strong>of</strong> her priorities. As a university teacher, she has invested substantial time incareer guidance and counseling <strong>of</strong> students, especially advanced students and alumnae. In fact, her interest in the welfare <strong>of</strong>“her protégées" has led her to track their life paths both formally (i.e., through research) and informallyAkshada Chitre has completed a B.Sc. and M.Sc. in Human Development from the Nirmala Niketan College <strong>of</strong> Home Science,University <strong>of</strong> Mumbai. She is working as a lecturer at New Zealand Tertiary College (NZTC), India (specializing in earlychildhood teacher education). As a newly appointed lecturer, she is looking forward to facilitating students in being effectiveteachers as well as future researchers. Her research interests include multiculturalism, spirituality and early childhoodeducation.Shweta Lakhwara has completed a B.Sc. and M.Sc. in Human Development from the Nirmala Niketan College <strong>of</strong> HomeScience, University <strong>of</strong> Mumbai. She is currently working with Edvance Learning Preschool Private Limited as the AssistantManager--Pedagogy and Franchisee Development. Her main role is to design curriculum for Edvance preschools. Some <strong>of</strong> herother responsibilities include providing training to teachers, and conducting workshops for parents. She is interested in researchin the following areas: neuroscience, spirituality, and social networking sites.15IAEVG-Jiva Conference, India, 2010
- Page 1 and 2: The IAEVG-JivaInternational Confere
- Page 3 and 4: Message from IAEVG PresidentFive ye
- Page 5 and 6: Message from Conference PatronCaree
- Page 7 and 8: Message from Canterbury Christ Chur
- Page 9 and 10: Message from Jacobs FoundationWith
- Page 11 and 12: Alida MalpicaEspañol / Cartel o Po
- Page 13 and 14: Anita RatnamEnglish / Scientific Pa
- Page 15: Anna Paszkowska-RogaczPoster / Engl
- Page 19 and 20: Anuradha Bakshi, Ishrat Shaikh, Het
- Page 21 and 22: Anuradha Bakshi, Riddhi Shah & Para
- Page 23 and 24: Archana JainEnglish / Scientific Pa
- Page 25 and 26: Aziel Marques & Nirmala AlmeidaEngl
- Page 27 and 28: Bernadette Gigliotti & Naomi Corlet
- Page 29 and 30: Bryan Hiebert, Karen Schober & Lest
- Page 31 and 32: Chakradhar BuddhaEnglish / Scientif
- Page 33 and 34: Col McCowan OAMEnglish / WorkshopWe
- Page 35 and 36: Devika V. R.English / Key Note Pres
- Page 37 and 38: Gideon Arulmani, Jayashree Vyasaraj
- Page 39 and 40: Giriswar MisraEnglish / Key Note Pr
- Page 41 and 42: Hazel Reid & Linden WestEnglish / S
- Page 43 and 44: Heli PiikkiläEnglish / Scientific
- Page 45 and 46: Helmut ZellothEnglish / Scientific
- Page 47 and 48: Jahnvee Joshi & Anuradha BakshiEngl
- Page 49 and 50: Jayashree Vyasarajan & Gideon Arulm
- Page 51 and 52: Jenny Bimrose & Alan BrownEnglish /
- Page 53 and 54: José Tomás da SilvaEnglish / Scie
- Page 55 and 56: Julio Gonzalez BEnglish / Scientifi
- Page 57 and 58: Kamini Ramachandran & Gideon Arulma
- Page 59 and 60: Kartik KalyanramEnglish / Scientifi
- Page 61 and 62: Kerry BernesEnglish / Scientific Pa
- Page 63 and 64: Kinjal Maru & Anuradha BakshiEnglis
- Page 65 and 66: Leela DarvallEnglish / Scientific P
- Page 67 and 68:
Lilian Ojeda CastellanosEspañol /
- Page 69 and 70:
Maribon Viray SangmaEnglish / Scien
- Page 71 and 72:
Marjatta Vanhalakka-Ruoho, Leena Ko
- Page 73 and 74:
Mary McMahon, Mark Watson & Jenny B
- Page 75 and 76:
Michel Turcotte, Reginald Savard &
- Page 77 and 78:
Nancy ArthurEnglish / Scientific Pa
- Page 79 and 80:
Nigel PhillipsEnglish / WorkshopCar
- Page 81 and 82:
Olga T Bernatte de SanabriaEspañol
- Page 83 and 84:
Paranosh Mazkoory, Benaaz Irani & A
- Page 85 and 86:
Payal Maheshwari & Riddhi SavlaEngl
- Page 87 and 88:
Rachel VallesEnglish / Scientific P
- Page 89 and 90:
Raza AbbasEnglish / Scientific Pape
- Page 91 and 92:
Rhonda Divecha, Payal Maheshwari, K
- Page 93 and 94:
Rhonda Divecha, Payal Maheshwari,Ri
- Page 95 and 96:
Riitta Virtanen & Auli RyhänenEngl
- Page 97 and 98:
Roberta NeaultEnglish / WorkshopTra
- Page 99 and 100:
Rojas LuisaEspañol / Scientific Pa
- Page 101 and 102:
Sachin Kumar & Gideon ArulmaniEngli
- Page 103 and 104:
Salvatore Soresi & Laura NotaEnglis
- Page 105 and 106:
Shilpa Ashok PanditEnglish / Scient
- Page 107 and 108:
Singje MarakEnglish / Scientific Pa
- Page 109 and 110:
Sonali Nag, Sue Stothard, Poonam Na
- Page 111 and 112:
Subasree VanamaliEnglish / Scientif
- Page 113 and 114:
Swathi Menon & Nirmala AlmeidaEngli
- Page 115 and 116:
Tristram Hooley, Jenny Bimrose & Ta
- Page 117 and 118:
Vicente Hernandez FrancoEspañol /
- Page 119 and 120:
William Borgen & Bryan HiebertEngli