Anita Ratnam, Neelam Chibber, Raghav Rajagopalan& Ritu SethiEnglish / Key Note PresentationA symposium on traditional occupations in a modern worldAbstractThis Key Note Symposium will look at a spectrum <strong>of</strong> issues facing traditional occupations and theirimplications for career counseling and livelihood planning. Traditional occupations like small holderfarming and crafts are floundering today weighed down by feudalism within communities practicingthese, as well as hostile markets that prefer the agribusiness corporation to the farmer and the technosavvy mass producer to the artisan. Young people from farming and craft communities <strong>of</strong>ten find thatthe lack <strong>of</strong> dignity, <strong>of</strong> intellectual challenge and <strong>of</strong> economic reward, makes their parents’ occupations,something to run away from. At the same time, instances <strong>of</strong> <strong>org</strong>anic farmers as successful moderneco- businessesman, and <strong>of</strong> artisan collectives as aesthetically focused export oriented entrepreneursthrow up several interesting questions about the “modernization” <strong>of</strong> the “traditional”. Today there arefarmers and artisans emerging from time warps, re-negotiating primordial caste identities and gendernorms, and struggling with new worldviews and finding new ways <strong>of</strong> engagement with society and themarket. This Key Note Symposium will examine the challenges posed by these instances for careercounseling and livelihood planning with young people from such communities. An unwittingencouragement to them to abandon these occupations in search <strong>of</strong> status and security has severalimplications for the individual, as well as for notions <strong>of</strong> occupational mobility. <strong>The</strong> Session will als<strong>of</strong>ocus on subtle messages about traditional occupations conveyed in the course <strong>of</strong> career guidance,especially to those who don’t belong to farming/artisan families. How these occupations (and thosewho practice them) are to be perceived - as belonging “to the past” or as voices<strong>of</strong> sanity and health for the future- needs serious examination. <strong>The</strong> symposium will thus help in placingissues concerning traditional occupations, in the broader discourse <strong>of</strong> careers and livelihoods.About the presentersContact Information:email:Language:Type <strong>of</strong> Presentation:Samvada, Flat No. 4/4, Siddha Enclave, 4 Main Road, Nehru Nagar,Sheshadripuram, Bangalore 560 020, India.ratnam.anita@gmail.comEnglishKey Note PresentationAnita Ratnam is the Executive Director <strong>of</strong> Samvada, an NGO that works with young people, focusing on their livelihoods andcareer development.Neelam Chibber is one <strong>of</strong> the leading social entrepreneurs <strong>of</strong> the country. She is the founder <strong>of</strong> Indus Tree that promotes locallyowned and operated craft manufacturing enterprises. She is also the Executive Director <strong>of</strong> Mother Earth a socially orientedcompany that straddles craft with big business.Raghav Rajagopalan is a specialist on <strong>org</strong>anisational culture and human processes. He specialises in supporting handicraftspromotion and rural development.Ritu Sethi is the Chairperson <strong>of</strong> the Craft Revival Trust which is an <strong>org</strong>anisation committed to the mapping and documentation <strong>of</strong>intangible heritage <strong>of</strong> crafts, textiles, folk and tribal arts and the oral knowledge systems that support them.12IAEVG-Jiva Conference, India, 2010
Anna Paszkowska-RogaczPoster / EnglishValidity <strong>of</strong> Youth Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Interest Questionnaire (YPIQ) - Diagnostic testprocess supporting pr<strong>of</strong>essional aptitude and interests <strong>of</strong> pupilsAbstract<strong>The</strong> poster reports an attempt to develop and validate a research instrument (Youth Pr<strong>of</strong>essionalInterest Questionnaire) capable <strong>of</strong> measuring the six occupational interests <strong>of</strong> students - managerial,methodological, social, innovative, scientific and artistic. A conceptual base for the instrument wasworks <strong>of</strong> Holland, Gardner, and Strelau. <strong>The</strong> item pool collected by four career counselors contained150 statements that were answered using 5-point Likert scale with response that ranged from 1 to 5.<strong>The</strong> YPIQ was administered to three samples <strong>of</strong> 600 Polish primary, secondary and high schoolstudents (total 1800), with an age <strong>of</strong> 14-19. All samples consisted <strong>of</strong> 50% girls and 50% boys. Principalcomponents factor analysis with promax rotation was run on the first sample. Six criteria wereconsidered in determining the number <strong>of</strong> components to rotate: the number <strong>of</strong> components witheigenvalues 1.0, the scree test, the percentage <strong>of</strong> variance accounted by each component, thepercentage <strong>of</strong> total variance accounted for, the number <strong>of</strong> interpretable components, and the MonteCarlo Analysis. Strong support appeared for the construct validity showing six components thatparalleled the six scales in the inventory. A confirmatory factor analysis was run to test the structure <strong>of</strong>YPIQ. <strong>The</strong> model contained six latent variables (corresponding to scales) and allowed for correlatedfactors and uncorrelated residuals. <strong>The</strong> fit indices were acceptable. Results <strong>of</strong> analysis which was runon the second sample indicated that the final version <strong>of</strong> instrument containing 60 statements exhibitssatisfactory levels <strong>of</strong> convergent, discriminant and predictive validity, as well as reasonably high testretestreliability and consistency. Results were compared to other lengthier instruments likeMultidimensional Questionnaire <strong>of</strong> Preferences (Matczak et al., 2006)) and Questionnaire <strong>of</strong>Temperament (Strelau, Zawadzki, 1998) designed to measure similar dimensions. <strong>The</strong> standardscores are based on the third, random sample from the national data base. <strong>The</strong> YPIQ provides apossibility <strong>of</strong> conducting diagnostic screening <strong>of</strong> graduates from primary schools, secondary schoolsand high school students. <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the questionnaire are helpful in choosing a career, directions<strong>of</strong> education, and vocational training.About the presenterDesignation:Organization:Contact Information:email:Language:Type <strong>of</strong> Presentation:Senior LecturerFoundation for Implementation <strong>of</strong> Social Programs, University <strong>of</strong> Lodz.92-547 Lodz, ul. Bartoka 9 m 31, Poland.paszkow@uni.lodz.plEnglishPosterAnna Paszkowska-Rogacz, holds a PhD in Humanistic Science, and Master degree in Psychology. She is an expert in the area<strong>of</strong> career development facilitating, and scientific worker at the Section <strong>of</strong> Occupational Psychology and Career Counselling <strong>of</strong>the Institute <strong>of</strong> Psychology at the University <strong>of</strong> Lodz, Poland. Her background includes counseling work for educationalinstitutions and social welfare. She is the head <strong>of</strong> the postgraduate studies in ‘Career Counselling’, and social competencetrainer. She is the Author, co-author and editor <strong>of</strong> about 100 published works including research reports, articles and books. Sheis the Content co-ordinator <strong>of</strong> ten Leonardo da Vinci and Grundvig international projects. She is a member <strong>of</strong> the PolishPsychological Society, the Polish Association for Career Counselors, and the International Association for Educational andVocational Guidance.13IAEVG-Jiva Conference, India, 2010
- Page 1 and 2: The IAEVG-JivaInternational Confere
- Page 3 and 4: Message from IAEVG PresidentFive ye
- Page 5 and 6: Message from Conference PatronCaree
- Page 7 and 8: Message from Canterbury Christ Chur
- Page 9 and 10: Message from Jacobs FoundationWith
- Page 11 and 12: Alida MalpicaEspañol / Cartel o Po
- Page 13: Anita RatnamEnglish / Scientific Pa
- Page 17 and 18: Anuradha Bakshi, Shweta Lakhwara &
- Page 19 and 20: Anuradha Bakshi, Ishrat Shaikh, Het
- Page 21 and 22: Anuradha Bakshi, Riddhi Shah & Para
- Page 23 and 24: Archana JainEnglish / Scientific Pa
- Page 25 and 26: Aziel Marques & Nirmala AlmeidaEngl
- Page 27 and 28: Bernadette Gigliotti & Naomi Corlet
- Page 29 and 30: Bryan Hiebert, Karen Schober & Lest
- Page 31 and 32: Chakradhar BuddhaEnglish / Scientif
- Page 33 and 34: Col McCowan OAMEnglish / WorkshopWe
- Page 35 and 36: Devika V. R.English / Key Note Pres
- Page 37 and 38: Gideon Arulmani, Jayashree Vyasaraj
- Page 39 and 40: Giriswar MisraEnglish / Key Note Pr
- Page 41 and 42: Hazel Reid & Linden WestEnglish / S
- Page 43 and 44: Heli PiikkiläEnglish / Scientific
- Page 45 and 46: Helmut ZellothEnglish / Scientific
- Page 47 and 48: Jahnvee Joshi & Anuradha BakshiEngl
- Page 49 and 50: Jayashree Vyasarajan & Gideon Arulm
- Page 51 and 52: Jenny Bimrose & Alan BrownEnglish /
- Page 53 and 54: José Tomás da SilvaEnglish / Scie
- Page 55 and 56: Julio Gonzalez BEnglish / Scientifi
- Page 57 and 58: Kamini Ramachandran & Gideon Arulma
- Page 59 and 60: Kartik KalyanramEnglish / Scientifi
- Page 61 and 62: Kerry BernesEnglish / Scientific Pa
- Page 63 and 64: Kinjal Maru & Anuradha BakshiEnglis
- Page 65 and 66:
Leela DarvallEnglish / Scientific P
- Page 67 and 68:
Lilian Ojeda CastellanosEspañol /
- Page 69 and 70:
Maribon Viray SangmaEnglish / Scien
- Page 71 and 72:
Marjatta Vanhalakka-Ruoho, Leena Ko
- Page 73 and 74:
Mary McMahon, Mark Watson & Jenny B
- Page 75 and 76:
Michel Turcotte, Reginald Savard &
- Page 77 and 78:
Nancy ArthurEnglish / Scientific Pa
- Page 79 and 80:
Nigel PhillipsEnglish / WorkshopCar
- Page 81 and 82:
Olga T Bernatte de SanabriaEspañol
- Page 83 and 84:
Paranosh Mazkoory, Benaaz Irani & A
- Page 85 and 86:
Payal Maheshwari & Riddhi SavlaEngl
- Page 87 and 88:
Rachel VallesEnglish / Scientific P
- Page 89 and 90:
Raza AbbasEnglish / Scientific Pape
- Page 91 and 92:
Rhonda Divecha, Payal Maheshwari, K
- Page 93 and 94:
Rhonda Divecha, Payal Maheshwari,Ri
- Page 95 and 96:
Riitta Virtanen & Auli RyhänenEngl
- Page 97 and 98:
Roberta NeaultEnglish / WorkshopTra
- Page 99 and 100:
Rojas LuisaEspañol / Scientific Pa
- Page 101 and 102:
Sachin Kumar & Gideon ArulmaniEngli
- Page 103 and 104:
Salvatore Soresi & Laura NotaEnglis
- Page 105 and 106:
Shilpa Ashok PanditEnglish / Scient
- Page 107 and 108:
Singje MarakEnglish / Scientific Pa
- Page 109 and 110:
Sonali Nag, Sue Stothard, Poonam Na
- Page 111 and 112:
Subasree VanamaliEnglish / Scientif
- Page 113 and 114:
Swathi Menon & Nirmala AlmeidaEngli
- Page 115 and 116:
Tristram Hooley, Jenny Bimrose & Ta
- Page 117 and 118:
Vicente Hernandez FrancoEspañol /
- Page 119 and 120:
William Borgen & Bryan HiebertEngli