03.12.2012 Views

Life-Cycle Management - Army Logistics University - U.S. Army

Life-Cycle Management - Army Logistics University - U.S. Army

Life-Cycle Management - Army Logistics University - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

‘Lily-Pad’ ‘Lily-Pad’ Basing Basing Concept Concept<br />

Put to the Test Test<br />

BY CAPTAIN DAVID C. CHANDLER, JR.<br />

As the <strong>Army</strong> transforms to an expeditionary force,<br />

a new concept called “lily-pad” basing is being<br />

developed for basing troops overseas. Under this<br />

concept, the United States would not have permanent,<br />

large-scale military installations in another country.<br />

Instead of building its own bases as it has in the past, the<br />

<strong>Army</strong> would use other countries’ existing facilities. It<br />

would have only a skeletal staff and an agreement with<br />

the host country that the base could be used as a forward<br />

operating base in a time of crisis. These “lily-pad”<br />

bases would be austere training and deployment sites<br />

often in areas not previously used for U.S. bases.<br />

Can the <strong>Army</strong>’s new method of expeditionary operations<br />

be supported using the “lily-pad” basing concept?<br />

Soldiers of the 21st Theater Support Command (TSC)<br />

in Kaiserslautern, Germany, sought to answer that<br />

question. Their task was to deploy several hundred soldiers<br />

from Illinois to an austere location in Eastern<br />

Europe; provide those soldiers with food, fuel, and supplies;<br />

and allow them to train in preparation for a<br />

notional follow-on deployment to a combat or peacekeeping<br />

theater of operations. The operation took place<br />

in the Novo Selo Training Area in central Bulgaria in<br />

July and August 2004. About 1,300 soldiers, contractors,<br />

and host nation workers participated.<br />

The objectives of the exercise were to—<br />

• Test expeditionary force operations by moving<br />

troops from the continental United States and U.S.<br />

bases in Europe to an austere location and enabling<br />

them to conduct quality training.<br />

• Build international relations with Bulgaria.<br />

• Test the Bulgarian infrastructure’s potential for<br />

supporting future operations involving U.S. forces.<br />

Novo Selo Training Area<br />

U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Europe’s 18th Engineer Brigade served<br />

as the higher control for the exercise. Units from the<br />

21st TSC formed Task Force Log and served as the<br />

core for the logistics support mission under the command<br />

and control of the 37th Transportation Command<br />

from Kaiserslautern, Germany. The 212th<br />

Mobile <strong>Army</strong> Surgical Hospital from Miesau, Germany,<br />

and the 236th Medical Company (Air Ambulance)<br />

from Landstuhl, Germany, provided medical<br />

support. The training unit was the 2–130 Infantry Battalion,<br />

an Illinois <strong>Army</strong> National Guard unit.<br />

Local Bulgarian contractors—coordinated by<br />

Halliburton Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR) and the U.S.<br />

Joint Contracting Command (JCC)—established the life<br />

support area at Novo Selo (shown above), consisting of<br />

facility tents (chapel; <strong>Army</strong> and Air Force Exchange<br />

Service; dining; and morale, welfare and recreation),<br />

sleep tents, and containerized headquarters buildings.<br />

KBR also provided services such as operation of the<br />

dining facility and upkeep of the life support area.<br />

The Bulgarian economy supplied many products and<br />

services for the exercise. One exercise goal was to maximize<br />

host nation support and build relations with the<br />

Bulgarian Ministry of Defense (BMOD) using a statement<br />

of requirements and a North Atlantic Treaty Organization<br />

standardization agreement. However, the<br />

BMOD had only a few existing civil contracts and could<br />

not reliably establish new ones in time, so its contractual<br />

support was limited to the provision of bulk fuel, force<br />

protection augmentation, military vehicle support, and<br />

military liaison officers. The rest of the contracts were<br />

established by JCC or KBR. JCC contracted for laundry,<br />

ARMY LOGISTICIAN PROFESSIONAL BULLETIN OF UNITED STATES ARMY LOGISTICS 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!