Ecology and Development Series No. 10, 2003 - ZEF
Ecology and Development Series No. 10, 2003 - ZEF Ecology and Development Series No. 10, 2003 - ZEF
Impacts of human use on the forest vegetationTable 5.7. Height class distribution some trees in the different forest categories. Height classes: 1 -HC 1, 2- HC 2; 3- HC 3, 4-HC 4. The numbers represent the number of stems recorded in 10 sample plots of 400 m 2 .Species nameNATFOR SECFOR SEMIFOR-NEW SEMIFOR-OLD SEMIFOR-PLAN1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4Albizia grandibracteata 577 107 7 13 908 46 12 17 400 33 8 2 419 41 5 5 428 17 4 1Bridelia micrantha - 1 1 - - 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - -Cordia africana - - 3 2 - 4 3 1 97 1 3 2 18 - - 2 - - 1 -Diospyros abyssinica 472 206 8 4 338 169 4 2 205 9 1 - 160 94 - - 9 36 - -Elaeodendron buchananii 9 14 18 - - 2 4 1 - - 1 1 - 27 - - - - - -Galiniera saxifraga 9 1 1 - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Millettia ferruginea - 37 8 1 - 46 1 - 80 2 3 - 18 3 - - 18 76 11 -Mimusops kummel 117 3 - - 98 20 1 - 9 - - - - - - - - - - -Olea capensis ssp. hochstetteri 258 27 - - 9 - - - 9 - - - - - - - - - - -Sapium ellipticum 9 4 6 3 - 2 4 1 18 - 4 2 18 1 1 1 9 8 4 -Vepris dainelli 161 42 - - 54 41 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Note: Height class distribution of all woody plants is found in Appendix 7.87
Impacts of human use on the forest vegetationThe population structure of coffee also varies in the different forest categories(Table 5.8). The SEMIFOR-OLD has the highest abundance of coffee trees. However, theproportion of seedlings is highest in the NATFOR and lowest in the SEMIFOR-PLAN. Thehighest proportion (75%) of the abundance of mature coffee trees was recorded in theSEMIFOR-PLAN and the lowest in the NATFOR (Table 5.8).Table 5.8. Total abundance, proportion of seedlings (< 1.5 m tall) and mature trees (> 1.5 mtall), and basal area of coffee in five forest categories. Note that total abundanceis number of stems per 10 sample plots of 400 m 2 (0.4 ha).SEMIFOR-NATFOR SECFOR SEMIFOR-NEW SEMIFOR-OLD PLANTotal abundance 7448 8021 8417 10221 7861Seedlings (%) 74 69 51 43 25Trees (%) 26 31 49 57 75Basal area (m 2 /ha) 1.4 1.7 3.8 6.3 7.85.3.4 Differences in abundances and vegetation structureThe results of the analysis of the differences in total abundance in different height classes ofthe five forest categories are presented in Tables 5.9 - 5.10. The ANOVA tables of theheight classes can be found in Appendix 5. The five forest categories were highlysignificantly different (P < 0.001; Table 5.9) from each other with respect to totalabundance. The differences in abundance of all height classes were also highly significant(P < 0.001; Table 5.9).Table 5.9. Results of one-way ANOVA for differences in abundance among the forestcategories in different height classesHeight class F 4, 45 P-valueTotal abundance 21.269 < 0.001HC 1 13.963 < 0.001HC 2 28.860 < 0.001HC 3 13.319 < 0.001HC 4 6.853 < 0.00188
- Page 44 and 45: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 46 and 47: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 48 and 49: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 50 and 51: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 52 and 53: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 54 and 55: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 56 and 57: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 58 and 59: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 60 and 61: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 62 and 63: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 64 and 65: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 66 and 67: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 68 and 69: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 70 and 71: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 72 and 73: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 74 and 75: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 76 and 77: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 78 and 79: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 80 and 81: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 82 and 83: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 84 and 85: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 86 and 87: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 88 and 89: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 90 and 91: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 92 and 93: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 96 and 97: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 98 and 99: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 100 and 101: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 102 and 103: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 104 and 105: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 106 and 107: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 108 and 109: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 110 and 111: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 112 and 113: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 114 and 115: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 116 and 117: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 118 and 119: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 120 and 121: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 122 and 123: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 124 and 125: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 126 and 127: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 128 and 129: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 130 and 131: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 132 and 133: Conclusions and recommendations7 CO
- Page 134 and 135: Conclusions and recommendations3. R
- Page 136 and 137: ReferencesBatisse M. 1986 Developin
- Page 138 and 139: ReferencesDavis A.P. and Rokotonaso
- Page 140 and 141: ReferencesESRI. 1996. ArcView GIS:
- Page 142 and 143: ReferencesIUCN 1992. Protected Area
Impacts of human use on the forest vegetationThe population structure of coffee also varies in the different forest categories(Table 5.8). The SEMIFOR-OLD has the highest abundance of coffee trees. However, theproportion of seedlings is highest in the NATFOR <strong>and</strong> lowest in the SEMIFOR-PLAN. Thehighest proportion (75%) of the abundance of mature coffee trees was recorded in theSEMIFOR-PLAN <strong>and</strong> the lowest in the NATFOR (Table 5.8).Table 5.8. Total abundance, proportion of seedlings (< 1.5 m tall) <strong>and</strong> mature trees (> 1.5 mtall), <strong>and</strong> basal area of coffee in five forest categories. <strong>No</strong>te that total abundanceis number of stems per <strong>10</strong> sample plots of 400 m 2 (0.4 ha).SEMIFOR-NATFOR SECFOR SEMIFOR-NEW SEMIFOR-OLD PLANTotal abundance 7448 8021 8417 <strong>10</strong>221 7861Seedlings (%) 74 69 51 43 25Trees (%) 26 31 49 57 75Basal area (m 2 /ha) 1.4 1.7 3.8 6.3 7.85.3.4 Differences in abundances <strong>and</strong> vegetation structureThe results of the analysis of the differences in total abundance in different height classes ofthe five forest categories are presented in Tables 5.9 - 5.<strong>10</strong>. The ANOVA tables of theheight classes can be found in Appendix 5. The five forest categories were highlysignificantly different (P < 0.001; Table 5.9) from each other with respect to totalabundance. The differences in abundance of all height classes were also highly significant(P < 0.001; Table 5.9).Table 5.9. Results of one-way ANOVA for differences in abundance among the forestcategories in different height classesHeight class F 4, 45 P-valueTotal abundance 21.269 < 0.001HC 1 13.963 < 0.001HC 2 28.860 < 0.001HC 3 13.319 < 0.001HC 4 6.853 < 0.00188