Ecology and Development Series No. 10, 2003 - ZEF
Ecology and Development Series No. 10, 2003 - ZEF Ecology and Development Series No. 10, 2003 - ZEF
Floristic analysis of the undisturbed forestnot occur in other similar forests of Ethiopia and is discussed in more detail in thefollowing section.4.4.2 The plant community types and differences in environmental variablesCommunity ecology has a long tradition in which discrete habitats or community types aredistinguished in terms of species composition or environmental variables (Van Tongeren1995; McCune and Grace 2002). Nowadays, different numerical classification methods arecommonly used as alternatives to the subjective classification methods like the Zuerich-Montpellier phytosociological system in order to identify internally homogeneous anddistinct groups (Leps and Simlauer 2003). The major distinguishing features of the threegroups identified in this study are the dominant plant species in the lower stratum (below10 m) of small trees and shrubs. The use of indicator taxa is commonly practiced in reserveselection (Balmford 1998; Howard et al. 1998). Identifying community that have someindicator species and understanding the relation of the community types with variations inenvironmental variables are important for making decisions in reserve design.It has long been established that the patterns in vegetation are correlated withgradients in environmental variables (Whittaker 1967; Smith and Huston 1989). Themultivariate analysis including classification and ordination can provide more detailed andcomprehensive information on the patterns in vegetation and the response of plant speciesto the underlying gradients (Gauch 1982; Ter Braak 1995). In Yayu forest, the plant speciesdistribution, and hence the patterns in forest vegetation are mainly influenced by thegradients in terrain variables such as altitude, slope and distance from the river banks.Vegetation in mountainous regions responds to small-scale variation in terrain (Bolstad etal. 1998), because, micro-climatic conditions affecting plant species distribution liketemperature and soil moisture vary with changes in the terrain characteristics.Altitude is an important terrain variable, since it affects atmospheric pressure, moisture andtemperature, which in turn influence the growth and development of plants, and the patternsin vegetation distribution (Hedberg 1964). The vegetation types in SW Ethiopia are mainlydelimited by altitude (Friis 1992; Bonnefille et al. 1993; Kumelachew and Tamrat 2002).Slope also has a strong influence on soil chemical properties, since the soils on steeper59
Floristic analysis of the undisturbed forestslopes are influenced by bedrock and tend to be less moist and less acidic (Tewolde 1986).Hence, slope strongly affects the composition and structure of forest vegetation. Maximumtree size tends to decrease with increasing slope, while abundance of stems tends toincrease (Takyu et al. 2002). However, different species respond differently to gradients.Distance from river bank and soil moisture content are also known to be inversely related(Carr 1998), and hence play an important role in zonation of vegetation along riversides.Carr (1998) observed different vegetation zones along the Omo river in SW Ethiopia.The patterns of occurrence of the sites or plots representing the three groups orcommunity types are influenced by the three terrain variables mentioned above and theresulting micro-climate and soil characteristics (texture, moisture content and chemicalproperties) as a result of their direct or indirect impacts. The dominance of coffee in Group1 (Coffea arabica group) is, for instance, not random, but related to the gradients in theenvironmental variables; this group has the lowest mean slope and the highest meanaltitude. It also has the longest mean distance from the Geba river. Similar to the results inthis study, Tewolde (1966) observed that the abundance of coffee decreases withincreasing. On the other hand, contrary to Tewolde’s observations at Yassera and Tobaforests (Tewolde 1986), it appears that the coffee occurrence at Yayu increases withincreasing altitude. This is quite possible, since Yayu forest lies in the lower half of thealtitudinal range in which coffee occurs in the natural forests of SW Ethiopia, whileYassera and Toba are located in the upper half, at altitudes ranging from 1600 m to 1850 m(Tewolde 1978; 1986). The altitudinal distribution range of the wild coffee populations inSW Ethiopia is between 1000 m and 2000 m (Meyer 1965; Friis 1979). Similarly, theabundances of coffee trees decrease with increasing altitude in Bonga forest at areas higherthan 1700 m (Abayneh 1998). On the other hand, the upper altitudinal limit for coffee inHarrena forest, SE Ethiopia, is 1700 m and the lower limit is defined by changes invegetation composition and moisture (Mesfin and Lisanework 1996). The maximumdevelopment of the coffee trees and abundance in Harrena, however, occurs between 1390m and 1450 m, and 1550 m and 1600 m (Mesfin and Lisanework 1996).Contrary to the Coffea arabica group, the Argomuellera macrophylla group ischaracterized by very steep slope, lower altitude and shorter distance from the Geba river.60
- Page 16 and 17: Current state of knowledge2 STATE O
- Page 18 and 19: Current state of knowledgeThe studi
- Page 20 and 21: Current state of knowledgemore prom
- Page 22 and 23: Current state of knowledge2.2 Taxon
- Page 24 and 25: Current state of knowledgekapakata,
- Page 26 and 27: Current state of knowledgecultivars
- Page 28 and 29: Current state of knowledgehomegarde
- Page 30 and 31: Current state of knowledgeseeded pl
- Page 32 and 33: Current state of knowledgeHailu, un
- Page 34 and 35: Current state of knowledgeraces are
- Page 36 and 37: Description of the study area and s
- Page 38 and 39: Description of the study area and s
- Page 40 and 41: Description of the study area and s
- Page 42 and 43: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 44 and 45: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 46 and 47: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 48 and 49: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 50 and 51: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 52 and 53: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 54 and 55: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 56 and 57: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 58 and 59: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 60 and 61: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 62 and 63: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 64 and 65: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 68 and 69: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 70 and 71: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 72 and 73: Floristic analysis of the undisturb
- Page 74 and 75: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 76 and 77: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 78 and 79: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 80 and 81: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 82 and 83: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 84 and 85: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 86 and 87: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 88 and 89: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 90 and 91: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 92 and 93: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 94 and 95: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 96 and 97: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 98 and 99: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 100 and 101: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 102 and 103: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 104 and 105: Impacts of human use on the forest
- Page 106 and 107: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 108 and 109: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 110 and 111: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 112 and 113: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
- Page 114 and 115: Conservation of the wild Coffea ara
Floristic analysis of the undisturbed forestslopes are influenced by bedrock <strong>and</strong> tend to be less moist <strong>and</strong> less acidic (Tewolde 1986).Hence, slope strongly affects the composition <strong>and</strong> structure of forest vegetation. Maximumtree size tends to decrease with increasing slope, while abundance of stems tends toincrease (Takyu et al. 2002). However, different species respond differently to gradients.Distance from river bank <strong>and</strong> soil moisture content are also known to be inversely related(Carr 1998), <strong>and</strong> hence play an important role in zonation of vegetation along riversides.Carr (1998) observed different vegetation zones along the Omo river in SW Ethiopia.The patterns of occurrence of the sites or plots representing the three groups orcommunity types are influenced by the three terrain variables mentioned above <strong>and</strong> theresulting micro-climate <strong>and</strong> soil characteristics (texture, moisture content <strong>and</strong> chemicalproperties) as a result of their direct or indirect impacts. The dominance of coffee in Group1 (Coffea arabica group) is, for instance, not r<strong>and</strong>om, but related to the gradients in theenvironmental variables; this group has the lowest mean slope <strong>and</strong> the highest meanaltitude. It also has the longest mean distance from the Geba river. Similar to the results inthis study, Tewolde (1966) observed that the abundance of coffee decreases withincreasing. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, contrary to Tewolde’s observations at Yassera <strong>and</strong> Tobaforests (Tewolde 1986), it appears that the coffee occurrence at Yayu increases withincreasing altitude. This is quite possible, since Yayu forest lies in the lower half of thealtitudinal range in which coffee occurs in the natural forests of SW Ethiopia, whileYassera <strong>and</strong> Toba are located in the upper half, at altitudes ranging from 1600 m to 1850 m(Tewolde 1978; 1986). The altitudinal distribution range of the wild coffee populations inSW Ethiopia is between <strong>10</strong>00 m <strong>and</strong> 2000 m (Meyer 1965; Friis 1979). Similarly, theabundances of coffee trees decrease with increasing altitude in Bonga forest at areas higherthan 1700 m (Abayneh 1998). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the upper altitudinal limit for coffee inHarrena forest, SE Ethiopia, is 1700 m <strong>and</strong> the lower limit is defined by changes invegetation composition <strong>and</strong> moisture (Mesfin <strong>and</strong> Lisanework 1996). The maximumdevelopment of the coffee trees <strong>and</strong> abundance in Harrena, however, occurs between 1390m <strong>and</strong> 1450 m, <strong>and</strong> 1550 m <strong>and</strong> 1600 m (Mesfin <strong>and</strong> Lisanework 1996).Contrary to the Coffea arabica group, the Argomuellera macrophylla group ischaracterized by very steep slope, lower altitude <strong>and</strong> shorter distance from the Geba river.60