Ecology and Development Series No. 10, 2003 - ZEF

Ecology and Development Series No. 10, 2003 - ZEF Ecology and Development Series No. 10, 2003 - ZEF

13.07.2015 Views

Conservation of the wild Coffea arabica populations in situThe core zone and buffer zone-I accounted for 23 and 5% of the total area of landconsidered in the analysis, respectively. These two zones nearly completely cover theundisturbed forest areas, which is about 28% of the total area. The area allocated as bufferzone-I is smaller than the moderately suitable areas of the undisturbed forest identified inthe analysis (Table 6.5), since many small parts of moderately suitable areas are embeddedin the highly suitable class (Figure 6.5; OWA1), and were hence classified as part of thecore zone (Figure 6.6, Table 6.6).The relatively small percentage of the total area available for the core zone isattributed to the presence of large proportions of farmland, settlement area, and forestsmanaged for coffee production, which together constitute 72% of the area (Table 6.5). Outof this, buffer zone-II covered 26% of the total area of the landscape (Table 6.6), which isequivalent to that of managed forests (Table 6.5), while the transition zone covered 46% ofthe area, representing farmlands and settlement areas.Table 6.6. Reserve zone areasManagement Area Proportion of Commentszone (ha) total landscapeCore zone 8544.4 23.4% Areas classified as highly suitable in OWA1Buffer zone-I 1652.2 4.5% Areas classified as moderately suitable in OWA1Buffer zone- 9594.4 26.2% Forest areas managed as semi-forest for coffeeIIproduction and slightly suitable in OWA1Transitionzone16794.0 45.9% Farmland, rangeland and settlement areas adjacentto forest6.4 Discussion6.4.1 Evaluation criteriaThe terrain-derived data were very useful to determine vegetation patterns and developevaluation criteria for a reserve design. The abundance of coffee and the species diversityindex are strongly related to some terrain-derived data and the PCA axes scores. Coffeeabundance is strongly positively correlated with the first PCA axis scores, which in turnrepresent the environmental gradient of the combinations of several variables. Among theterrain-derived data, slope has a strong negative correlation with coffee abundance. On theother hand, the diversity index was negatively correlated with the site scores of the second121

Conservation of the wild Coffea arabica populations in situPCA axis. The second PCA axis represents the second gradient of environmental variables.The PCA axis scores can better explain the variations of environmental gradients, sincethey account for all possible combinations of variables that were not or could not bemeasured (Mora and Iverson 2002; Reyers et. al 2002). The distribution patterns of theabundances of coffee and diversity index predicted by these relationships (figure 6.3 a, b)are similar to the patterns observed in the forest vegetation (Chapter 4.3). Similarly, theareas at low altitudes had high diversity indices, and those at the mid and high altitudes ongentle slopes show high coffee abundance.Ideally, decision-making concerning biodiversity conservation should take intoaccount as many relevant criteria as possible (Kamppinen and Walls 1999). However, inmultiple criteria evaluation, increasing the number of input criteria may decrease the degreeof suitability and the areas that can be classified as highly suitable (Basnet 2001).6.4.2 Reserve zonesThe multi-criteria decision analysis carried out using the OWA model is found to besuitable for identifying potential reserve areas and, thus, supporting the relevant decisionmaking considerably. In the past, different techniques for designing reserves have beenused (e.g., Diamond 1967; MacArthur and Wilson 1967; Higgs and Usher 1980; Higgs1981; Margules et al. 1982; Buckley 1982; Blouin and Connor, 1985; Usher 1986; Li et al.1999; Clemens et al. 1999; Heijnis et al. 1999; Akcakaya 2000; Scot and Sullivan 2000).Most of the recent reserve design methods were based the heuristic method, which has rulesfor including mandatory polygons, forcing adjacency, including desirable and excludingundesirable features (Bedward et al. 1992; Williams and ReVelle 1996; Heijnis et al. 1999;Clemens et al. 1999). These approaches are similar to Boolean evaluation methods in thatthe input criteria are not continuous map layers, but polygons with values of either 1 or 0.The OWA model is more interesting and relevant since the resulting map has continuousindex values and varying degrees of suitability (Jiang and Eastman 2000; Eastman 2001).As opposed to a single solution obtained either using intersection or union in the Booleanoperations, OWA provides different sets of solutions, which fall anywhere in between theintersection (AND, or minimum suitability) and union (OR, or maximum suitability). It is122

Conservation of the wild Coffea arabica populations in situPCA axis. The second PCA axis represents the second gradient of environmental variables.The PCA axis scores can better explain the variations of environmental gradients, sincethey account for all possible combinations of variables that were not or could not bemeasured (Mora <strong>and</strong> Iverson 2002; Reyers et. al 2002). The distribution patterns of theabundances of coffee <strong>and</strong> diversity index predicted by these relationships (figure 6.3 a, b)are similar to the patterns observed in the forest vegetation (Chapter 4.3). Similarly, theareas at low altitudes had high diversity indices, <strong>and</strong> those at the mid <strong>and</strong> high altitudes ongentle slopes show high coffee abundance.Ideally, decision-making concerning biodiversity conservation should take intoaccount as many relevant criteria as possible (Kamppinen <strong>and</strong> Walls 1999). However, inmultiple criteria evaluation, increasing the number of input criteria may decrease the degreeof suitability <strong>and</strong> the areas that can be classified as highly suitable (Basnet 2001).6.4.2 Reserve zonesThe multi-criteria decision analysis carried out using the OWA model is found to besuitable for identifying potential reserve areas <strong>and</strong>, thus, supporting the relevant decisionmaking considerably. In the past, different techniques for designing reserves have beenused (e.g., Diamond 1967; MacArthur <strong>and</strong> Wilson 1967; Higgs <strong>and</strong> Usher 1980; Higgs1981; Margules et al. 1982; Buckley 1982; Blouin <strong>and</strong> Connor, 1985; Usher 1986; Li et al.1999; Clemens et al. 1999; Heijnis et al. 1999; Akcakaya 2000; Scot <strong>and</strong> Sullivan 2000).Most of the recent reserve design methods were based the heuristic method, which has rulesfor including m<strong>and</strong>atory polygons, forcing adjacency, including desirable <strong>and</strong> excludingundesirable features (Bedward et al. 1992; Williams <strong>and</strong> ReVelle 1996; Heijnis et al. 1999;Clemens et al. 1999). These approaches are similar to Boolean evaluation methods in thatthe input criteria are not continuous map layers, but polygons with values of either 1 or 0.The OWA model is more interesting <strong>and</strong> relevant since the resulting map has continuousindex values <strong>and</strong> varying degrees of suitability (Jiang <strong>and</strong> Eastman 2000; Eastman 2001).As opposed to a single solution obtained either using intersection or union in the Booleanoperations, OWA provides different sets of solutions, which fall anywhere in between theintersection (AND, or minimum suitability) <strong>and</strong> union (OR, or maximum suitability). It is122

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!