NICE TO SEE YOU BACK - DTU Informatics
NICE TO SEE YOU BACK - DTU Informatics NICE TO SEE YOU BACK - DTU Informatics
2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2. Properties2.3.2.2. Mereology97Example: 13 Documents: A Conceptual Mereology.• The mereology of, for example, this document,– that is, of the tutorial slides,is determined by the author.• There unfolds, while writing the document,– a set of unique identifiers– for section, subsection, sub-subsection, paragraph, etc., units.and– between texts of a “paper version” of the documentand slides of a “slides version” of the document.A Precursor for Requirements Engineering 97 c○ Dines Bjørner 2012, DTU Informatics, Techn.Univ.of Denmark – July 20, 2012: 12:33
982. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2. Properties2.3.2.2. Mereology• This occurs as the author necessarily– inserts cross-references,∗ in unit texts to other units, and∗ from unit texts to other documents (i.e., ‘citations’);– and while inserting “page” shifts for the slides.• From those inserted referencesthere emerges what we could call the document mereology;c○ Dines Bjørner 2012, DTU Informatics, Techn.Univ.of Denmark – July 20, 2012: 12:33 98 Domain Science & Engineering
- Page 15 and 16: 462. Domain Entities 2.1. Entities2
- Page 17 and 18: 482. Domain Entities 2.1. Entities2
- Page 19 and 20: 502. Domain Entities 2.2. Endurants
- Page 21 and 22: 522. Domain Entities 2.2. Endurants
- Page 23 and 24: 542. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts•
- Page 25 and 26: 562. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.
- Page 27 and 28: 582. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.
- Page 30 and 31: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.1.
- Page 32 and 33: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.1.
- Page 34 and 35: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.1.
- Page 36 and 37: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.1.
- Page 38 and 39: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.1.
- Page 40 and 41: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.1.
- Page 42 and 43: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.1.
- Page 44 and 45: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.1.
- Page 46 and 47: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.1.
- Page 48 and 49: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 50 and 51: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 52 and 53: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 54 and 55: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 56 and 57: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 58 and 59: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 60 and 61: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 62 and 63: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 64 and 65: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 68 and 69: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 70 and 71: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 72 and 73: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 74 and 75: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 76 and 77: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2.
- Page 78 and 79: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.3.
- Page 80 and 81: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.3.
- Page 82 and 83: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.3.
- Page 84 and 85: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.4.
- Page 86 and 87: 2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.4.
- Page 88: 118LONG BREAKc○ Dines Bjørner 20
2. Domain Entities 2.3. Parts2.3.2. Properties2.3.2.2. Mereology97Example: 13 Documents: A Conceptual Mereology.• The mereology of, for example, this document,– that is, of the tutorial slides,is determined by the author.• There unfolds, while writing the document,– a set of unique identifiers– for section, subsection, sub-subsection, paragraph, etc., units.and– between texts of a “paper version” of the documentand slides of a “slides version” of the document.A Precursor for Requirements Engineering 97 c○ Dines Bjørner 2012, <strong>DTU</strong> <strong>Informatics</strong>, Techn.Univ.of Denmark – July 20, 2012: 12:33