The Simplicity of the Gandhian Discourse in Hind Swaraj (1909)
The Simplicity of the Gandhian Discourse in Hind Swaraj (1909)
The Simplicity of the Gandhian Discourse in Hind Swaraj (1909)
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Tamer Söyler, Humboldt Universitynot go<strong>in</strong>g to fall <strong>in</strong>to a similar pattern and speculate on <strong>the</strong>nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> simplicity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gandhian</strong> discourse but <strong>the</strong>impacts <strong>of</strong> it. We cannot know why Gandhi presented hismessages <strong>in</strong> a simple form but we can discuss how thisspecial genre served his cause. To do this, a simple questionneeds to be answered first: Why did Gandhi write H<strong>in</strong>d<strong>Swaraj</strong>? This is a key question to ask and it has a ra<strong>the</strong>rsimple answer. Gandhi wrote <strong>the</strong> booklet <strong>in</strong> order tocommunicate. First to <strong>the</strong> Indians, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world.Never<strong>the</strong>less, such an answer does not reveal much for us. Itra<strong>the</strong>r calls for ano<strong>the</strong>r question: Why did Gandhi choose tocommunicate his ideas to o<strong>the</strong>rs? To answer this question ishard if not totally impossible. It is self-evident that wecannot know why Gandhi wrote H<strong>in</strong>d <strong>Swaraj</strong> as it is andmake sense <strong>of</strong> his action exhaustively. If we try to do so, wewill end up isolat<strong>in</strong>g one or more aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gandhian</strong>discourse from o<strong>the</strong>rs which would give us a partial view.But, be that as it may, this is <strong>the</strong> only way to utilize a<strong>the</strong>ory/model to make sense <strong>of</strong> any subject matter <strong>in</strong> socialsciences. Keep<strong>in</strong>g our reflexivity concerns, we still have toturn to H<strong>in</strong>d <strong>Swaraj</strong> and discuss why it may be that one ormore reasons bear more importance than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs forGandhi writ<strong>in</strong>g H<strong>in</strong>d <strong>Swaraj</strong>. In that sense, I th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>the</strong> wordsGandhi carefully chose as titles for <strong>the</strong> Gujarati and Englisheditions <strong>of</strong> H<strong>in</strong>d <strong>Swaraj</strong> reveal much. Gandhi named <strong>the</strong>Gujarati edition as H<strong>in</strong>d <strong>Swaraj</strong>. Later, he translated <strong>the</strong>booklet <strong>in</strong>to English as Indian Home Rule. Withoutdisregard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> over-<strong>in</strong>terpretation, I arguethat with those titles, Gandhi expressed <strong>the</strong> rationale beh<strong>in</strong>d<strong>the</strong> booklet: Promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> self-rule <strong>in</strong> British India.In Gandhi’s collected writ<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>the</strong>re is enough evidence toback up this argument. This <strong>in</strong>deed cannot be <strong>the</strong> onlyreason for Gandhi writ<strong>in</strong>g H<strong>in</strong>d <strong>Swaraj</strong>, but perhaps this was<strong>the</strong> most important reason. <strong>The</strong>n, to make sense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>simplicity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gandhian</strong> discourse <strong>in</strong> this historical text,we need to ask how it served <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> self-rule.Byhis effort to communicate through H<strong>in</strong>d <strong>Swaraj</strong>, Gandhibrought Indian self-rule to <strong>the</strong> attention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world.Primarily, Indian people's attention. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to relevance<strong>the</strong>ory, communication is ma<strong>in</strong>ly about relevance. Bycommunicat<strong>in</strong>g to someone, we imply that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation939