13.07.2015 Views

Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas

Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas

Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

491 Questions— 22 February 2005. <strong>Written</strong> <strong>Answers</strong> 492[Mr. Crawford.]drawn to <strong>the</strong> fact that two persons (detailssupplied) in County Monaghan who wereassessed by Department personnel and found toneed remedial tuition have now been advised thatno remedial help is available; and if she will makea statement on <strong>the</strong> matter. [5985/05]Minister for Education and Science (MsHanafin): Having confirmed <strong>the</strong> identities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>pupils in question with <strong>the</strong> Deputy’s <strong>of</strong>fice, I wishto confirm that my Department considered applicationsfor resource teaching support for bothpupils. The school was advised on 4 February2005 that <strong>the</strong> pupils do not qualify for resourceteaching support as <strong>the</strong> applications did not meet<strong>the</strong> criteria for such support. The school currentlyhas <strong>the</strong> services <strong>of</strong> a learning support teacher postand a resource teacher post supporting a totalenrolment <strong>of</strong> 28 pupils. It would be expected that<strong>the</strong> special educational needs <strong>of</strong> both pupils canbe met from within <strong>the</strong>se resources. I understandthat <strong>the</strong> assessments were carried out by a personwho was a former member <strong>of</strong> my Department’sstaff.350. Mr. Naughten asked <strong>the</strong> Minister for Educationand Science <strong>the</strong> reason special needs assistantsin primary school both part-time and fulltimestaff receive holiday pay but assistants inthird level colleges do not receive such a payment;<strong>the</strong> plans she has to review this situation;and if she will make a statement on <strong>the</strong>matter. [5987/05]Minister for Education and Science (MsHanafin): Personal assistants are utilised withinthird level colleges for certain classes <strong>of</strong> studentswith disabilities, mainly those with physical ormobility difficulties. The main source <strong>of</strong> fundingfor personal assistants is <strong>the</strong> fund for studentswith disabilities. Colleges <strong>of</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r and highereducation can apply on behalf <strong>of</strong> students whorequire a personal assistant in order to participateequitably in <strong>the</strong>ir education. Contractual arrangementsin relation to personal assistants varybetween institutions. Most colleges ei<strong>the</strong>r useagencies that supply personal assistants, oremploy personal assistants directly on temporarypart-time or wholetime contracts. In both cases,<strong>the</strong> employer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> personal assistant is requiredto comply with <strong>the</strong> relevant employment legislationwhich is in force at this time. In somesmaller colleges, personal assistants are contractedon a self-employed basis directly by <strong>the</strong>student, who is provided with <strong>the</strong> necessaryresources by <strong>the</strong>ir college.The manner in which <strong>the</strong> personal assistantsare employed is a matter for each institution. Theterms and conditions <strong>of</strong> employment foremployees who provide support for students withdisabilities in third level is a matter for <strong>the</strong> individualcolleges concerned.Departmental Correspondence.351. Mr. Wall asked <strong>the</strong> Minister for Defenceif he will investigate <strong>the</strong> issues raised in correspondence(details supplied); and if he will makea statement on <strong>the</strong> matter. [5640/05]Minister for Defence (Mr. O’Dea): The issuesraised in <strong>the</strong> correspondence referred to by <strong>the</strong>Deputy are not a matter for <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong>Defence, nor has an application to use DefenceForces facilities been received from <strong>the</strong> group inquestion.Defence Forces Ombudsman.352. Mr. Stanton asked <strong>the</strong> Minister forDefence <strong>the</strong> position regarding <strong>the</strong> DefenceForces ombudsman, including powers and functionsand date <strong>of</strong> commencement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> role; if<strong>the</strong> ombudsman will be able to investigate complaintsby persons who are no longer members <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Defence Forces; <strong>the</strong> way in which <strong>the</strong>ombudsman can be contacted; and if he will makea statement on <strong>the</strong> matter. [5658/05]Minister for Defence (Mr. O’Dea): The personappointed to be <strong>the</strong> ombudsman for <strong>the</strong> DefenceForces will be selected through a process <strong>of</strong> openpublic competition held by <strong>the</strong> Public AppointmentsService. This competition will be advertisedas soon as possible.As regards <strong>the</strong> matter <strong>of</strong> former members <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Defence Forces making application to <strong>the</strong>Defence Forces ombudsman, on his-her appointment,<strong>the</strong> position is that <strong>the</strong> Ombudsman(Defence Forces) Act 2004 generally providesthat both serving and former members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Defence Forces may make an application within12 months <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> an action complained<strong>of</strong> or within 12 months <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> applicanthaving become aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> action complained<strong>of</strong>. However, members and former members <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Defence Forces will not be able to makeapplication to <strong>the</strong> Defence Forces ombudsman inregard to a matter which pre-dates <strong>the</strong> commencement<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> legislation. Complaints madeby serving members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Defence Forces relatingto matters pre-dating <strong>the</strong> commencement <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> legislation may be submitted to <strong>the</strong> Ministerthrough <strong>the</strong> structured redress <strong>of</strong> wrongs process,as at present, on a transitional basis when <strong>the</strong> newlegislation is commenced.Defence Forces Property.353. Mr. Wall asked <strong>the</strong> Minister for Defence<strong>the</strong> position regarding overholders in <strong>the</strong>Curragh, County Kildare; <strong>the</strong> position regardinghis Department’s proposals to address <strong>the</strong> matter;his plan to provide alternative accommodationfor <strong>the</strong>se persons and <strong>the</strong>ir families; and if he willmake a statement on <strong>the</strong> matter. [5763/05]Minister for Defence (Mr. O’Dea): Personnelon being discharged from <strong>the</strong> Permanent DefenceForce are obliged to vacate married quarterswithin a short period <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir dis-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!