13.07.2015 Views

Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas

Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas

Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

409 Questions— 22 February 2005. <strong>Written</strong> <strong>Answers</strong> 410Swilly will be carried out; if this will be done inconjunction with interested parties such as aquacultureinterests, licensed wild oyster dredgers andrepresentatives from <strong>the</strong> Inch fishing communityand traditional hand-pickers; and if he will makea statement on <strong>the</strong> matter. [5754/05]Minister <strong>of</strong> State at <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong>Communications, Marine and Natural Resources(Mr. Gallagher): A comprehensive survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>wild oyster beds in Lough Swilly was carried outin 2001 by personnel from Bord Iascaigh Mharain conjunction with staff from <strong>the</strong> aquacultureinitiative — a cross-Border body funded under<strong>the</strong> peace programme. The survey was conductedin conjunction with <strong>the</strong> Lough Swilly Wild OysterDevelopment Association, LSWODA, and o<strong>the</strong>rwild fisheries interests and its findings werewidely disseminated at that time. Since <strong>the</strong>n anumber <strong>of</strong> smaller-scale surveys <strong>of</strong> specific areas<strong>of</strong> Lough Swilly have been carried out. Mostrecently, a survey was conducted adjacent to <strong>the</strong>Ballygreen area, <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> which, I understand,will be reported to <strong>the</strong> Department before<strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> February. At <strong>the</strong> request <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>LSWODA, a fur<strong>the</strong>r local survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ryebridgearea is to be carried out in <strong>the</strong> next sixmonths by BIM and aquaculture initiative staffas before.I am advised that as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work carriedout in recent years, <strong>the</strong> location and extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Lough Swilly wild oyster beds are quite wellunderstood. In <strong>the</strong>se circumstances, <strong>the</strong>re are noproposals at present for a fur<strong>the</strong>r comprehensivesurvey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oyster beds.Fishing Vessel Licences.177. Mr. Kenny asked <strong>the</strong> Minister forCommunications, Marine and Natural Resourcesif his attention has been drawn to <strong>the</strong> hardshipcaused by conditions to licences awarded to certainfishing vessels (details supplied); and if hewill make a statement on <strong>the</strong> matter. [5824/05]Minister <strong>of</strong> State at <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong>Communications, Marine and Natural Resources(Mr. Gallagher): The Fisheries Consolidation Act1959, as amended, expressly empowers <strong>the</strong> licensingauthority to make it a condition <strong>of</strong> a sea-fishingboat licence that a certain proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>crew <strong>of</strong> a boat shall be <strong>of</strong> a specified nationality.The requirement for a certain proportion <strong>of</strong> crewmembers to be <strong>of</strong> EU nationality arises from <strong>the</strong>importance <strong>of</strong> achieving <strong>the</strong> maximum economicbenefit to coastal communities and <strong>the</strong> Irish economygenerally from <strong>the</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> an Irish seafishingboat. The requirement was reduced from75% to 50% in 2001 following representationsfrom industry representatives. It should be notedthat <strong>the</strong> recent enlargement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EuropeanUnion has increased <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> potentialcrew members from EU nationalities. Since thischange was implemented, <strong>the</strong>re has been nodemand from industry representatives for anyfur<strong>the</strong>r change in this requirement. In <strong>the</strong> eventthat a change in <strong>the</strong> requirement is pursued byindustry representatives, I will review <strong>the</strong> matter.178. Mr. Ferris asked <strong>the</strong> Minister forCommunications, Marine and Natural Resourcesif <strong>the</strong> licensing authority will issue a short-termpolyvalent licence to a person (detailssupplied). [5862/05]179. Mr. Ferris asked <strong>the</strong> Minister forCommunications, Marine and Natural Resources<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> short-term polyvalent licenceswhich have been issued since 1 January 2005.[5863/05]180. Mr. Ferris asked <strong>the</strong> Minister forCommunications, Marine and Natural Resources<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> short-term pelagic licences whichhave been re-issued since 1 January 2005.[5864/05]Minister <strong>of</strong> State at <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong>Communications, Marine and Natural Resources(Mr. Gallagher): I propose to take Question Nos.178 to 180, inclusive, toge<strong>the</strong>r.The particular licence applicant referred to by<strong>the</strong> Deputy wrote to me on 31 January 2005 seekinga polyvalent sea-fishing boat licence for <strong>the</strong>vessel in question, without <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> 100%replacement capacity, on a short-term basis. Iwrote to him on 9 February informing him thatresponsibility for <strong>the</strong> licensing <strong>of</strong> sea-fishing boatshad transferred to <strong>the</strong> licensing authority for seafishingboats established under <strong>the</strong> Fisheries(Amendment) Act 2003 and that I had passed hisletter to <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> licensing authority, asenior <strong>of</strong>ficial in <strong>the</strong> Department, for direct replyto him. The licensing authority operates on anindependent basis subject to certain criteria andimplements licensing policy in accordance withministerial policy directives.I understand that <strong>the</strong> licensing authority, whichhad previously met and written to <strong>the</strong> individualconcerned about this matter, replied to him on 10February and again explained that sea-fishingboat licensing policy does not permit <strong>the</strong> licensingauthority to license <strong>the</strong> vessel without fullreplacement capacity being provided in advance.It pointed out that ministerial policy directive2/2003, issued to <strong>the</strong> licensing authority on 17November 2003, makes it clear that <strong>the</strong> 1:1replacement capacity requirement applies o<strong>the</strong>rthan in limited specified cases. I understand that<strong>the</strong> licensing authority recently agreed to extend,by three months, <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>licence <strong>of</strong>fer issued to <strong>the</strong> individual concerned togive him more time to comply with licensingrequirements.On <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> “short-term” licences, nostatutory period is specified in respect <strong>of</strong> whichsea-fishing licences may be granted. Subject toany overriding licensing policy considerations,this is an operational matter for <strong>the</strong> licensingauthority which can issue licences having validityfor any period <strong>of</strong> time in <strong>the</strong> interests <strong>of</strong> efficientmanagement <strong>of</strong> licensing and taking into account

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!