13.07.2015 Views

Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas

Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas

Written Answers. - Parliamentary Debates - Houses of the Oireachtas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

405 Questions— 22 February 2005. <strong>Written</strong> <strong>Answers</strong> 406provision <strong>of</strong> \24.858 million for TG4. Decisionsin relation to <strong>the</strong> commissioning <strong>of</strong> programmesare a matter for TG4. I have no role in <strong>the</strong> matter.Postal Services.171. Mr. Andrews asked <strong>the</strong> Minister forCommunications, Marine and Natural Resourceshis views on <strong>the</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> An Post managementto allow <strong>the</strong> same pension increase to formeremployees as is being negotiated for existingstaff. [5590/05]Minister for Communications, Marine andNatural Resources (Mr. N. Dempsey): I refer <strong>the</strong>Deputy to my reply to Question No. 268 <strong>of</strong> 8February 2005.The authority to implement pension increaseswas delegated to An Post, subject to certain conditions,as this activity was considered part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>day-to-day operations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company. In practicethis allowed <strong>the</strong> company to implement pensionincreases following pay increases to employees.However, decisions outside <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> originaldelegated authority still require <strong>the</strong> consent<strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong> Minister for Communications, Marineand Natural Resources and <strong>the</strong> Minister forFinance.Following a proposal from <strong>the</strong> board <strong>of</strong> AnPost to amend <strong>the</strong> existing pension increase terms<strong>of</strong> An Post, in this instance, my Department and<strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Finance undertook a review<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> situation. While I fully empathise with AnPost pensioners for <strong>the</strong> position <strong>the</strong>y find <strong>the</strong>mselvesin due to <strong>the</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> An Post managementand unions to reach agreement on implementation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recovery strategy, <strong>the</strong> wideroverall policy issues raised by <strong>the</strong> proposal fromAn Post also need to be considered.By way <strong>of</strong> background and as <strong>the</strong> Deputy maybe aware, <strong>the</strong> existing terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> An Post superannuationscheme provide for pay parity, that is,that pensions are increased in line with <strong>the</strong> pay<strong>of</strong> serving staff. This is in accordance with publicservice defined benefit pension increase policygenerally, pay parity being an integral and wellestablished practice which is widely applied inpublic service defined benefit pension schemes.Unfortunately, following examination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>issue and taking into consideration <strong>the</strong> implications<strong>of</strong> providing a precedent which couldimpact adversely on <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> pensions in <strong>the</strong>wider public sector and <strong>the</strong> existing practice <strong>of</strong>pay parity, increases to pensioners <strong>of</strong> An Postlinked to increases under Sustaining Progress arenot possible at this time.While I understand <strong>the</strong> current frustration <strong>of</strong>An Post pensioners with <strong>the</strong> situation, agreementin partnership with An Post unions to <strong>the</strong> restructuringplan aimed at securing <strong>the</strong> future <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>company and providing sustainable long-termemployment for An Post workers is <strong>the</strong> way forward.With this in mind, I have urged both <strong>the</strong>unions and <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> An Post to engagefully with <strong>the</strong> industrial relations mechanisms <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> State to agree a way forward for <strong>the</strong> future <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> company and all stakeholders in this matter.Foreshore Licences.172. Mr. O’Shea asked <strong>the</strong> Minister forCommunications, Marine and Natural Resourceswhen a foreshore licence regarding <strong>the</strong> proposednew sewerage system at Cheekpoint, CountyWaterford, will be granted; and if he will make astatement on <strong>the</strong> matter. [5591/05]Minister <strong>of</strong> State at <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong>Communications, Marine and Natural Resources(Mr. Gallagher): Subsequent to making an applicationto <strong>the</strong> Department for a foreshore licencefor <strong>the</strong> Cheekpoint waste water treatment plant,Waterford County Council discovered that, dueto increasing siltation problems, <strong>the</strong> storm wateroverflow pipe would not have worked effectivelyat <strong>the</strong> location originally proposed for it. Consequently,<strong>the</strong> local authority put revised proposals,involving relocation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> overflow pipe, to <strong>the</strong>Department.The revised proposals were put to public consultationin December last. The submissionsreceived, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> county council’sresponses to <strong>the</strong>m, received by <strong>the</strong> Departmenton 19 January, have been examined by <strong>the</strong>Department’s engineering division. The matterwill now be put before <strong>the</strong> next meeting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>marine licence vetting committee, an expertgroup that advises me on proposals <strong>of</strong> this nature.I understand <strong>the</strong> issues to be considered by <strong>the</strong>committee in this case will include possibleimpacts on fishing and fisheries as well as possibleimplications for <strong>the</strong> navigation channel for <strong>the</strong>port <strong>of</strong> Waterford. A decision on <strong>the</strong> countycouncil’s proposals will be made as soon as possibleafter <strong>the</strong> marine licence vetting committeehas completed its consideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>application.Harbour Authorities.173. Mr. O’Shea asked <strong>the</strong> Minister forCommunications, Marine and Natural Resourceswhen a representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> workers will beappointed to <strong>the</strong> port <strong>of</strong> Waterford; and if he willmake a statement on <strong>the</strong> matter. [5602/05]Minister <strong>of</strong> State at <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong>Communications, Marine and Natural Resources(Mr. Gallagher): The appointment <strong>of</strong> anemployee director <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Port <strong>of</strong> Waterford companyfalls to be made by me in accordance with<strong>the</strong> procedure laid down in section 30 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> HarboursAct 1996. The legislation provides thatbefore making <strong>the</strong> appointment I shall consultany recognised trade union or staff associationconcerned which, following such consultation,may recommend that I consider that a particularperson be appointed as a director <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company.This statutory consultation process is completeand I will be making <strong>the</strong> appointment in <strong>the</strong>near future.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!