13.07.2015 Views

Measuring physical fitness in Persons with Severe/Profound ...

Measuring physical fitness in Persons with Severe/Profound ...

Measuring physical fitness in Persons with Severe/Profound ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DesignThe muscle tone and spasticity of 35 participants were measured twice (test and retest) <strong>with</strong> theMAS and MTS. The retest was conducted one week after the <strong>in</strong>itial test. The participants were firstassessed <strong>with</strong> the MAS and afterwards <strong>with</strong> the MTS. For each participant, both measurementswere conducted at the same time of day and under the same conditions. Two observersperformed the measurements. The <strong>in</strong>terrater reliability of the MAS and MTS was determ<strong>in</strong>edfrom the measurements of the two observers. The test-retest reliability of the MAS and MTS wasdeterm<strong>in</strong>ed by us<strong>in</strong>g the test-retest measurements of observer 1.MeasuresPrior to the measurements, the observers and personal guides of the participants completeda checklist conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the exclusion criteria. Both observers were present at the time of themeasurements. So that test<strong>in</strong>g would not cause additional stress to the participants, we madesure that the participants were familiar <strong>with</strong> observer 2. We created a protocol describ<strong>in</strong>g howto adm<strong>in</strong>ister the MAS and MTS based on the protocol of Gielen [18]. Gracies et al. [15] statedthat tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was associated <strong>with</strong> a highly significant improvement <strong>in</strong> reliability, so the observerswere tra<strong>in</strong>ed on how to perform the protocol. The tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g consisted of a brief explanation of theprotocol and practical exercises. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the practical exercises, the results were compared anddiscussed. In the present study, we measured the most restricted jo<strong>in</strong>t motion of both the elbowand the knee.Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)The MAS was carried out as follows. Dur<strong>in</strong>g five repetitions of a passive motion <strong>with</strong><strong>in</strong> one second,resistance was scored on the follow<strong>in</strong>g 6-po<strong>in</strong>t scale [7]:0 = No <strong>in</strong>creased resistance1 = Slightly <strong>in</strong>creased resistance (catch followed by relaxation or m<strong>in</strong>imal resistance at the endof the range of motion)1 + = Slightly <strong>in</strong>creased resistance (catch followed by m<strong>in</strong>imal resistance throughout less than halfof the range of motion)2 = Clear resistance throughout most of the range of motion3 = Strong resistance; passive movement is difficult4 = Rigid flexion or extensionCatch is the phenomenon that suddenly a strong resistance occurs dur<strong>in</strong>g a fast passivemovement.Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS)The MTS consists of two measurements: R2 and R1 [16]. A goniometer was used for measur<strong>in</strong>g therange of motion. The measurements were accurate to the 5-degree level. The R2 measurementconsisted of slow motion performed <strong>with</strong><strong>in</strong> one second. The range of motion was measured <strong>with</strong>a goniometer. The R1 measurement consisted of fast motion performed <strong>with</strong><strong>in</strong> half a second. Therange of motion immediately after the catch was measured <strong>with</strong> a goniometer.Chapter 7 | 109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!