Development of Parties and Party Systems in ... - lah@sam.sdu.dk

democratic or because societal actors particularly strong, but because the government is toofragmented and the state at the same time too weak to impose authoritarian rule 8 . Moreover, FraneAdam and Matej Makarovic argue that some new post-communist democracies may be labelled“deficient” 9 . The institutional structures, the cultural patterns, and the prevailing attitudes within thepublic sphere and among the political elites are basically democratic. But deficiencies likeinstrumental understanding of democracy, lack of efficiency in democratic institutions and lack oftrust in the system, limited elite circulation and media pluralism, etc., are still present, however, to adifferent extent in each country. Those deficiencies can be found on all democratic arenasmentioned below.In the case of democracy by design”, known from presidential rule and delegative democracy inRussia, those in control of the state machinery attempt to and may succed in shaping the institutionsand procedures of a competitive election in ways that ensure an outcome favorable to the designersthemselves 10 .Juan J. Linz and Alfred Stepan (Linz, Stepan, 1996:7) underline that democratic consolidationrequires much more than just elections and markets. Consolidated democracies requires a state, i.e.that stateness problems have been solved, that five interacting arenas have to be in place in order forconsolidation to exist, first a free and lively civil society, second a relatively autonomous andvalued political society, third a rule of law, fourth a state bureaucracy that is usable and fifth, aninstitutionalized economic society. Reform of public administration has been a crucial element inbuilding a democratic state. The problems connected to weak administrative structures have beencompounded by the absence of an effective (and honest) civil service and professional central andlocal administrators (Sakwa, 2002:123).Linz and Stepan argue (Linz, Stepan, 1996:3) that transition to democracy has gone towardcompletion“when sufficient agreement has been reached about political procedures to produce an electedgovernment, when a government comes to power that is the direct result of a free and popular vote,when this government de facto has the authority to generate new politics, and when the executive,legislative and judicial power generated by the new democracy does not have to share power withother bodies de jute”In the first stage of post-communism the institutions vital for a consolidated democracy e.g.political parties, elected parliaments and independent courts, have been established, but they do notfunction in optimal ways seen in the context of consolidation of democracy. As regardsconsolidation of democracy, all the Central European countries have passed the ”two-turn over test”as the political power has been handed over to the opposition peacefully in the case of electiondefeat for the ruling parties, but the democracy in the CEEC's can hardly be considered asconsolidated in more “advanced” sense. Democratic consolidation require e self-limitation by thepower holders as well as by the opposition. Political fundamentalism, political capitalism, identity8 Lucan A. Way, “Pluralism by Default in Moldova”, Journal of Democracy, Volume 13, Number 4, October 2002:127-141.9 Frane Adam and Matej Makarovic, “Postcommunist Transition and Social Science:The Case of Slovenia”, EastEuropean Quarterly, XXXVI, No. 3, September 2002.10 Michael Urban, “December 1993 as a Replication of Late-Soviet Electorale Practices”, Post-Soviet Affaires, Vol. 10,No. 2 (April-June 1994):128.19