13.07.2015 Views

Advance Modeling of a Skid-Steering Mobile Robot for Remote ...

Advance Modeling of a Skid-Steering Mobile Robot for Remote ...

Advance Modeling of a Skid-Steering Mobile Robot for Remote ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.2 Simulation Results 96• For λ max = 10 −3 , 10 −4 , the main peak frequency is the at same frequency <strong>for</strong> all thethree accelerometer axes, i.e. a x , a y , a z . Such a peak frequency seems to increase withthe angular velocity up to 20 Hz, <strong>for</strong> relatively low angular velocities (ω z < 20), while itremains almost constant at ¨low¨ frequency <strong>for</strong> relatively high angular velocities (ω z >20).• For λ max = 1, the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the vibrations linearly increases with the angular velocity<strong>for</strong> a y , while it remains almost constant at relatively low value <strong>for</strong> a x , a z .• For λ max = 10 −1 , 10 −2 , the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the vibrations linearly increases and then remainsalmost constant, respectively at low (ω z < 20) and high (ω z > 20) angularvelocity <strong>for</strong> a y , a x , while it remains almost constant at relatively low value <strong>for</strong> a z .• For λ max = 10 −3 , 10 −4 , the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the vibrations remains almost constant at relativelyhigh and low value respectively <strong>for</strong> a y and a x a z .• For all the tested cases, the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the vibrations is much smaller than the amplitudes<strong>of</strong> the real robot vibrations acquired from the accelerometers.Finally, we can claim that the overall model qualitatively reproduces the frequencies butnot the amplitudes <strong>of</strong> the real vibrations measured by the accelerometers. In particular, thevalue <strong>of</strong> λ max , which allows the model to be ¨closer¨ to the real system behavior, seems tobe <strong>of</strong> an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> 10 −1 , 10 −2 . However, by comparing the graphs in AppendixB and C and taking into account the considerations made in Section 3.2, we notice that themodel does not quantitatively reproduce the amplitudes and frequencies <strong>of</strong> the real robotvibrations yet. The reasons <strong>of</strong> such a discrepancy might rely on the lack <strong>of</strong> an identification<strong>of</strong> λ max or on the irregularities <strong>of</strong> the ground surface.Thus, we conclude saying that, in order to validate the model also from a quantitative point<strong>of</strong> view, an accurate identification/estimation <strong>of</strong> the maximum wheel slip λ max is needed. Ifafter such identification the model is still inaccurate <strong>for</strong> our needs, we can either try to modelthe irregularities <strong>of</strong> the ground surface or propose another model.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!