5.4.3 Expected impacts in absence of the NASBiodiversity in <strong>Swaziland</strong> is under increasing threats to both its distribution as well as itscomposition. The threats extend beyond just land conversions to cane but include severalother activities that are causing its decline or degradation.Many species in <strong>Swaziland</strong> have declining populations, some of which have already goneextinct such as the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus). A necessary first step to conservation isan assessment of species status to identify and, where possible, quantify rates of decline.<strong>Swaziland</strong> has produced two recent red data lists; one for plants (Dlamini and Dlamini, 2002)and one for vertebrates (Monadjem et al, 2003a). The former list has been updated for trees(Loffler and Loffler, 2005).A total of 132 species of vertebrates are listed in this book, consisting of 11 species of fish, 4species of amphibians, 14 species of reptiles, 55 species of birds and 48 species ofmammals (Table 13). These threatened species represent between 9-20% of the totalnumbers of fishes, amphibians, reptiles and birds occurring in <strong>Swaziland</strong>, but a significant38% of the mammalian fauna. When only the high risk categories are considered (i.e.regionally extinct, critically endangered, endangered and vulnerable), the threatened birdsand mammals represent between 7-9% of their total species richness, while the fishes,amphibians and reptiles represent between 2-4% of their diversities. Therefore, in bothabsolute and relative terms, birds and mammals are disproportionately threatened in<strong>Swaziland</strong>.Table 13:Summary of the number of vertebrates in each threat categoryNumber of speciesThreat category Fishes Amphibians Reptiles Birds MammalsRegionally Extinct 0 1 (2%) 0 7 (1%) 3 (1%)Critically endangered 3 0 0 1 0Endangered 1 0 0 12 3Vulnerable 2 0 2 14 6Sub-total (threatened) 6 (10%) 0 2 (2%) 27 (5%) 9 (7%)Sub-total (others) 5 3 12 21 36Total 11 (18%) 4 (9%) 14 (13%) 55 (11%) 48 (37%)Values in brackets represent the percentage of the total indigenous fauna occurring in <strong>Swaziland</strong>Of the 34 high risk species of birds, 13 (38%) species are birds of prey and a further 9 (26%)species are water birds (or birds associated with wetlands). These two groups of birds,therefore, account for almost two-thirds of threatened birds (Monadjem and Rasmussen,2008), even though they only represent less than one-third of the species diversity. Of the 12high risk species of mammals, 9 (75%) are either ungulates or large carnivores (>10 kg).These four groups (birds of prey, water birds, ungulates and large carnivores) account for61% of all high risk vertebrates.A total of 305 species of plants have been included in the red data list for the country,representing 9% of the total plant species richness. However, 62 species (2%) arethreatened (Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable), while 155 species are datadeficient.In the absence of the NAS, biodiversity decline will continue due to several other threatsaffecting biodiversity around the country.Land degradation, fragmentation of habitats, alien plant invasions and rapid degradation ofthe biological resources are the key challenges to be addressed by the country. The variouspolicy and legislative initiatives launched by government since Rio have so far remainedRDMU (<strong>Strategic</strong> Environmental Assessment of the National Adaptation Strategy) - Page 70
mostly on paper, are not cross-sectoral or integrated and most importantly are not matchedby adequate funding and expertise to implement the measures recommended bystakeholders. <strong>Swaziland</strong>’s classification as a lower-middle income country has contributed tothe difficulty in accessing donor funding for conservation and environmental management.Regional threats include factors such as atmospheric and water pollution, reductions of flowin rivers that have their sources in South Africa, cross-border smuggling of organisms andthe increasing spread of alien invasive plant species from neighbouring countries. Localthreats to <strong>Swaziland</strong>’s biodiversity can be grouped into the following categories: 1) those thatdestroy or alter the habitat, 2) over-exploitation, 3) the impact of exotic species, 4) weak lawenforcement, 5) inadequate awareness of value of resources, 6) population growth, 7) lack ofequity in ownership and management of biodiversity and 8) climate change.Relative importance of different types of anthropogenic threats on terrestrial, freshwater,estuarine and marine ecosystems in <strong>Swaziland</strong> are presented in the following table:Table 14:Anthropogenic threats on terrestrial, freshwater, estuarine and marineecosystems in <strong>Swaziland</strong>ThreatsTerrestrial FreshwaterHabitat loss and degradation Flow modification Invasive alien species, hybridisation and Genetically ModifiedOrganisms (GMOs) Over-harvesting Pollution Climate change Law enforcement Lack of equity in ownership and management of biodiversity – severe threat; – significant threat; – threatThe loss and degradation of <strong>Swaziland</strong>’s biodiversity has serious implications for its societyand economy. Natural ecosystems provide many essential services such as the provision ofclean water and air, prevention of soil erosion, pollination of crops, provision of medicinalplants, nutrient cycling, provision of food and shelter and the meeting of spiritual, cultural,aesthetic and recreational needs. Large portions of the country’s economy are heavilydependent on biodiversity including livestock ranching, horticulture and agriculture,commercial and subsistence use of medicinal plants, and ecotourism. The majority of Swazisare highly dependent on natural resources for their livelihoods, a situation which has beengreatly aggravated by the HIV/AIDS crisis, the declining economy and increasedunemployment.In addition, intact ecosystems (i.e. ecosystems which are in a natural or near natural state)are likely to play an important role in providing cost-effective resilience to the impacts ofclimate change, including buffering human settlements and activities from the impacts ofextreme climate events.5.4.4 Expected impacts with implementation of theNASThe implementation of the NAS is likely to have significant effects on <strong>Swaziland</strong>’s biodiversitythrough the clearing of land to make way for additional cane growing areas and otherinfrastructure to support irrigated cane production and processing.RDMU (<strong>Strategic</strong> Environmental Assessment of the National Adaptation Strategy) - Page 71
- Page 1 and 2:
Restructuring and DiversificationMa
- Page 3 and 4:
DISCLAIMERThe contents of this repo
- Page 5 and 6:
5.7.2 Expected impacts in absence o
- Page 7 and 8:
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
- Page 9 and 10:
HIVHPIIAIAIDIPCCIPPISOITFIWRMJWCKDD
- Page 11 and 12:
PSIRBARDMUREASWARMFRPDPRSARSSCSS&MS
- Page 13 and 14:
UNEPUNFCCCUNICEFUNISWAUSUS$VACVCTWF
- Page 15 and 16:
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARYSwaziland has be
- Page 17 and 18:
- In spite of the above water-stora
- Page 19 and 20:
to keep the same quality), destruct
- Page 21 and 22:
ooooMust be based on a basin-wide h
- Page 23 and 24:
ooooMust address the socio-economic
- Page 25 and 26:
- Optimal use should be made of thi
- Page 27 and 28:
2 BACKGROUND2.1 The EU sugar reform
- Page 29 and 30:
eing implemented directly by the in
- Page 31 and 32:
for implementation. For future StrE
- Page 33 and 34: operating in Swaziland, one in Simu
- Page 35 and 36: 4.2 Climate and climate changeSwazi
- Page 37 and 38: 4.4 Land and land tenureLand tenure
- Page 39 and 40: Most of the water in Swaziland (96%
- Page 41 and 42: −−−Decline in biodiversity (m
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 6: Cause-effect relationship
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 8:Cause-effect relationships
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 10:Cause-effect relationship
- Page 49 and 50: economic and social welfare in an e
- Page 51 and 52: 5.2.1.3 Water usage and demand in S
- Page 53 and 54: Table 7:Capacity, use, types and ch
- Page 55 and 56: 5.2.1.5 The Komati Downstream Devel
- Page 57 and 58: Table 8: Industry area (ha) by irri
- Page 59 and 60: 5.2.2 Expected impacts in absence o
- Page 61 and 62: ipening period. Presence of pests a
- Page 63 and 64: 5.2.2.5 Effects of future water sho
- Page 65 and 66: As was noted in the scoping report,
- Page 67 and 68: contribute to poverty alleviation.
- Page 69 and 70: sufficient to cover all the farmers
- Page 71 and 72: which revealed that 66% of the popu
- Page 73 and 74: funds, and they then have to mark u
- Page 75 and 76: contracts; in practical terms there
- Page 77 and 78: The United Nations Conference on Tr
- Page 79 and 80: safety net would alleviate fears ar
- Page 81 and 82: Table 11:Species diversity by ecosy
- Page 83: Figure 19:Distribution of endemic p
- Page 87 and 88: particularly true where mitigation
- Page 89 and 90: Enforcement of legislation is key t
- Page 91 and 92: In general, however, the HIV preval
- Page 93 and 94: The HAPAC Programme applied two imp
- Page 95 and 96: The company implements an HIV/AIDS
- Page 97 and 98: improving co-ordination; to have a
- Page 99 and 100: measures of the NAS, the RDMU indic
- Page 101 and 102: sustainable business. Based on ISO
- Page 103 and 104: Table 15:Synthesis of advantages an
- Page 105 and 106: Considering an approximate total of
- Page 107 and 108: Many factors intervene in determini
- Page 109 and 110: The legal responsibilities for the
- Page 111 and 112: 5.8 Key aspect 7: Regulation of eff
- Page 113 and 114: effluent standards. Otherwise there
- Page 115 and 116: 5.9.4 Options to address the key as
- Page 117 and 118: Table 17:NAS logframe indicators ne
- Page 119 and 120: IndicatorObjective 1a: Positive and
- Page 121 and 122: IndicatorObjective 1a: Positive and
- Page 123 and 124: 6.2 Proposed StrEA performance indi
- Page 125 and 126: Indicator Measurement ObservationsL
- Page 127 and 128: Indicator Measurement ObservationsR
- Page 129 and 130: 7.1 Addressing High Priority aspect
- Page 131 and 132: RECOMMENDATION INVOLVED INSTITUTION
- Page 133 and 134: RECOMMENDATION INVOLVED INSTITUTION
- Page 135 and 136:
RECOMMENDATION INVOLVED INSTITUTION
- Page 137 and 138:
H. REGULATION OF ATMOSPHERIC EMISSI
- Page 139 and 140:
RECOMMENDATION INVOLVED INSTITUTION
- Page 141 and 142:
NAS Area Description Proposed measu
- Page 143 and 144:
NAS Area Description Proposed measu
- Page 145 and 146:
NAS Area Description Proposed measu
- Page 147 and 148:
NAS Area Description Proposed measu
- Page 149 and 150:
Figure 29:Environmental and socio-e
- Page 151 and 152:
NAS ACTIONSWater balanceCont. of gr
- Page 153 and 154:
NAS ACTIONSWater balanceCont. of gr
- Page 155 and 156:
Annex 3: Key stakeholdersTable 19:M
- Page 157 and 158:
Institutional ActorMinistry of Natu
- Page 159 and 160:
Institutional ActorSwaziland SugarA
- Page 161 and 162:
Institutional ActorDepartment of Wa
- Page 163 and 164:
Table 20:Other key stakeholders rel
- Page 165 and 166:
StakeholderRiver BasinAuthorities (
- Page 167 and 168:
StakeholderWorld VisionWorld FoodPr
- Page 169 and 170:
Annex 4: Main policy documents and
- Page 171 and 172:
Policy, Plan orProgrammeNational Re
- Page 173 and 174:
Policy, Plan orProgrammeComprehensi
- Page 175 and 176:
Policy, Plan orProgrammeNational En
- Page 177 and 178:
Policy, Plan orProgrammeDraft Natio
- Page 179 and 180:
Piece of legislationNational TrustC
- Page 181 and 182:
Piece of legislationThe Public Heal
- Page 183 and 184:
Piece of legislationTreaty on devel
- Page 185 and 186:
Piece of legislationUnited NationsF
- Page 187 and 188:
Annex 5: Stakeholder engagement met
- Page 189 and 190:
Date Time Place Name Organisation P
- Page 191 and 192:
StrEA STUDY PHASEDate Time Place Na
- Page 193 and 194:
Annex 7: List of participants to th
- Page 195 and 196:
Annex 8: Agenda for the stakeholder
- Page 197 and 198:
Cortez, LAB and Brossard Pérez, LE
- Page 199 and 200:
Matsebula, M (2009) EC Accompanying
- Page 201 and 202:
Seebaluck, V.; Leal, MRLV; Rosillo-
- Page 203 and 204:
Annex 10: Terms of ReferenceTERMS O
- Page 205 and 206:
2.2. Requested services for the fir
- Page 207 and 208:
under consideration. The consultant
- Page 209 and 210:
2.5.4. Analysis of performance indi
- Page 211 and 212:
• Fluency in both written and spo