Annex 9: Documents consultedPolicy Documents (see also documents referred to in Annex 4 for GoS policydocuments)European Commission (2005) Commission Staff Working Paper, Action Plan onaccompanying measures for Sugar Protocol countries affected by the reform of the EU sugarregime, SEC(2005) 61, Brussels, 17.01.2005.European Commission <strong>Swaziland</strong> Multiannual Adaptation Strategy for the Period 2006-2013.European Commission Multi-Annual Indicative Programme (MIP) for <strong>Swaziland</strong> under theAMSP (<strong>2007</strong>-2010).European Commission, Draft Multi-Annual Indicative Programme (MIP) for <strong>Swaziland</strong> underthe AMSP (2011-2013).Background and Support DocumentsAcocks, JP (1988) Veld types of South Africa, 3 rd Edition, Mem. Bot. Surv, S. Afr. <strong>No</strong> 57,Botanical Institute, Pretoria.Baez-Smith, C (2006) Anaerobic digestion of vinasse for the production of methane in thesugar cane distillery, presented at the 2006 SPRI Conference on Sugar Processing.Barber, A; Pellow, G; and de Arangao Pereira, M (2008) The sustainability of Brazilian sugarcane bioethanol, a literature review, prepared for Energy Efficiency and ConservationAuthority (EECA).Batidzirai, B; Johnson, FX; Sobhanbabu, PRK; Leal, RLV; Seebaluck, V; Purchase, B (2008)Bioenergy for Sustainable Development and Global Competitiveness: the Case of SugarCane in Southern Africa, Thematic Report 5: International Experiences and Comparisons,CARENSA/SEI special report series.Canegrowers (nd) Managing Natural Resources; A Canegrowers Handbook, prepared byDuncan Hay, Institute of Natural Resources, Pietermaritzburg, for Canegrowers (SouthAfrica).Cançado, J; Saldiva, P; Pereira, L; Lara, L; Artaxo, P; Martinelli, L; Arbex, M; Zanobetti, A;and Braga, A (2006) The impacts of sugar-cane burning emissions on the respiratory systemof children and the elderly, Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(5): 725-729.CANGO (nd) Directory.Central Statistical Office (1998) <strong>Swaziland</strong> Population and Housing Census Volume 1, CSO:Mbabane.Central Statistical Office and Macro International Inc. (2008) <strong>Swaziland</strong>, Demographic andHealth Survey <strong>2007</strong>, Mbabane, <strong>Swaziland</strong>.Cheesman, O. (2004) The environmental impacts of sugar production, CABI Publishing.Chubekani Investments (PTY) LTD (2010) On-Farm Environmental Management Plan.Clancey, P.A. 1986. Endemicity in the southern African avifauna. Durban Mus. <strong>No</strong>vit. 13:245-284.RDMU (<strong>Strategic</strong> Environmental Assessment of the National Adaptation Strategy) - Page 182
Cortez, LAB and Brossard Pérez, LE (1997) Experiences of vinasse disposal Part III:Combustion of vinasse - #6 Fuel oil emulsions, Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering,14(1).Coyne et Bellier <strong>Swaziland</strong> (2005) LUSIP design review.Dlamini, TS and Dlamini, GM (2002) <strong>Swaziland</strong>, In JS Golding (ed) Southern African PlantRed Data Lists, Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Report <strong>No</strong> 14: 121-134.Dobson, L and Lotter, M (2004) Vegetation Map of <strong>Swaziland</strong>, In Mucina, L and Rutherford,MC (eds.) Vegetation Map of South Africa, Lesotho and <strong>Swaziland</strong>: Shapefiles of basicmapping units. Beta version 4.0, February 2004, National Botanical Institute, Cape Town.Driessen, WJBM, Tielbaard, MH, and Vereijken, TLFM (1994) Experience on anaerobictreatment of distillery effluent with the UASB process, Wat. Sci. Tech., 30(12) 193-201.Echavarria, M. (1996) To burn or not to burn: environmental, technological and economicconsiderations, Proceedings of the XXII Congress of the International Society of Sugar caneTechnologists, Cartagena, Colombia, 11-15 September 1995, pp. 38-42.Enabling Activities for the Preparation of Jamaica’s Second National Communication to theUNFCCC, Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessments Work Package 2: Water Resourcesand Agriculture, Final Report.Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority (2008) The Sustainability of Brazilian Sugarcane Bioethanol, a Literature Review, prepared by A. Barber; G. Pellow and M. de AragaoPereira.European Commission (2006) <strong>Swaziland</strong> Country Environmental Profile, prepared by A.Remmelzwaal (AGROTEC).European Commission (nd) Programming Guidelines, Accompanying Measures for SugarProtocol Countries (AMSP), 2011-2013.European Union (2009) Technical Assistance support to Smallholder Sugar Cane Growers –Phase 1: Inception Report.Falloon, T (2009) Burnt cane harvesting, an environmental perspective. Powerpointpresentation made at the SEA Study Workshop, Mandeville, Jamaica, 19 February.Global Agricultural Information Network – GAIN (2009) <strong>Swaziland</strong> Sugar Annual, GAINReport Number WZ9001 prepared by D. Esterhuizen.Global Water Partnership Southern Africa (2009) IWRM Survey and Status Report:<strong>Swaziland</strong>, prepared by AM Manyatsi and R Brown.Godbole, J. (2002) Ethanol from cane molasses, Powerpoint Presentation made at theHawaii Ethanol Workshop, <strong>No</strong>vember 14, 2002.Goudie, AS and Price Williams (1983) The Atlas of <strong>Swaziland</strong>, The <strong>Swaziland</strong> National TrustCommission, Occassional Paper <strong>No</strong>. 4.Government of the Kingdom of <strong>Swaziland</strong> (2006) The Second Multisectoral HIV and AIDS<strong>Strategic</strong> Plan 2006-2008.Gunkel, G; Kosmol, J; Sobral, M; Rohn, H; Montenegro, S and Aureliano, J (<strong>2007</strong>) SugarCane Industry as a Source of Water Pollution – Case Study on the situation in Ipojuca River,Pernambuco, Brazil, Water Air Soil Pollution, 180:261-269.Illovo Sugar Limited (2009) Annual Report 2009.International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development – ICTSD (2008) BiofuelProduction, Trade and Sustainable Development, policy discussion paper.RDMU (<strong>Strategic</strong> Environmental Assessment of the National Adaptation Strategy) - Page 183
- Page 1 and 2:
Restructuring and DiversificationMa
- Page 3 and 4:
DISCLAIMERThe contents of this repo
- Page 5 and 6:
5.7.2 Expected impacts in absence o
- Page 7 and 8:
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
- Page 9 and 10:
HIVHPIIAIAIDIPCCIPPISOITFIWRMJWCKDD
- Page 11 and 12:
PSIRBARDMUREASWARMFRPDPRSARSSCSS&MS
- Page 13 and 14:
UNEPUNFCCCUNICEFUNISWAUSUS$VACVCTWF
- Page 15 and 16:
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARYSwaziland has be
- Page 17 and 18:
- In spite of the above water-stora
- Page 19 and 20:
to keep the same quality), destruct
- Page 21 and 22:
ooooMust be based on a basin-wide h
- Page 23 and 24:
ooooMust address the socio-economic
- Page 25 and 26:
- Optimal use should be made of thi
- Page 27 and 28:
2 BACKGROUND2.1 The EU sugar reform
- Page 29 and 30:
eing implemented directly by the in
- Page 31 and 32:
for implementation. For future StrE
- Page 33 and 34:
operating in Swaziland, one in Simu
- Page 35 and 36:
4.2 Climate and climate changeSwazi
- Page 37 and 38:
4.4 Land and land tenureLand tenure
- Page 39 and 40:
Most of the water in Swaziland (96%
- Page 41 and 42:
−−−Decline in biodiversity (m
- Page 43 and 44:
Figure 6: Cause-effect relationship
- Page 45 and 46:
Figure 8:Cause-effect relationships
- Page 47 and 48:
Figure 10:Cause-effect relationship
- Page 49 and 50:
economic and social welfare in an e
- Page 51 and 52:
5.2.1.3 Water usage and demand in S
- Page 53 and 54:
Table 7:Capacity, use, types and ch
- Page 55 and 56:
5.2.1.5 The Komati Downstream Devel
- Page 57 and 58:
Table 8: Industry area (ha) by irri
- Page 59 and 60:
5.2.2 Expected impacts in absence o
- Page 61 and 62:
ipening period. Presence of pests a
- Page 63 and 64:
5.2.2.5 Effects of future water sho
- Page 65 and 66:
As was noted in the scoping report,
- Page 67 and 68:
contribute to poverty alleviation.
- Page 69 and 70:
sufficient to cover all the farmers
- Page 71 and 72:
which revealed that 66% of the popu
- Page 73 and 74:
funds, and they then have to mark u
- Page 75 and 76:
contracts; in practical terms there
- Page 77 and 78:
The United Nations Conference on Tr
- Page 79 and 80:
safety net would alleviate fears ar
- Page 81 and 82:
Table 11:Species diversity by ecosy
- Page 83 and 84:
Figure 19:Distribution of endemic p
- Page 85 and 86:
mostly on paper, are not cross-sect
- Page 87 and 88:
particularly true where mitigation
- Page 89 and 90:
Enforcement of legislation is key t
- Page 91 and 92:
In general, however, the HIV preval
- Page 93 and 94:
The HAPAC Programme applied two imp
- Page 95 and 96:
The company implements an HIV/AIDS
- Page 97 and 98:
improving co-ordination; to have a
- Page 99 and 100:
measures of the NAS, the RDMU indic
- Page 101 and 102:
sustainable business. Based on ISO
- Page 103 and 104:
Table 15:Synthesis of advantages an
- Page 105 and 106:
Considering an approximate total of
- Page 107 and 108:
Many factors intervene in determini
- Page 109 and 110:
The legal responsibilities for the
- Page 111 and 112:
5.8 Key aspect 7: Regulation of eff
- Page 113 and 114:
effluent standards. Otherwise there
- Page 115 and 116:
5.9.4 Options to address the key as
- Page 117 and 118:
Table 17:NAS logframe indicators ne
- Page 119 and 120:
IndicatorObjective 1a: Positive and
- Page 121 and 122:
IndicatorObjective 1a: Positive and
- Page 123 and 124:
6.2 Proposed StrEA performance indi
- Page 125 and 126:
Indicator Measurement ObservationsL
- Page 127 and 128:
Indicator Measurement ObservationsR
- Page 129 and 130:
7.1 Addressing High Priority aspect
- Page 131 and 132:
RECOMMENDATION INVOLVED INSTITUTION
- Page 133 and 134:
RECOMMENDATION INVOLVED INSTITUTION
- Page 135 and 136:
RECOMMENDATION INVOLVED INSTITUTION
- Page 137 and 138:
H. REGULATION OF ATMOSPHERIC EMISSI
- Page 139 and 140:
RECOMMENDATION INVOLVED INSTITUTION
- Page 141 and 142:
NAS Area Description Proposed measu
- Page 143 and 144:
NAS Area Description Proposed measu
- Page 145 and 146: NAS Area Description Proposed measu
- Page 147 and 148: NAS Area Description Proposed measu
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 29:Environmental and socio-e
- Page 151 and 152: NAS ACTIONSWater balanceCont. of gr
- Page 153 and 154: NAS ACTIONSWater balanceCont. of gr
- Page 155 and 156: Annex 3: Key stakeholdersTable 19:M
- Page 157 and 158: Institutional ActorMinistry of Natu
- Page 159 and 160: Institutional ActorSwaziland SugarA
- Page 161 and 162: Institutional ActorDepartment of Wa
- Page 163 and 164: Table 20:Other key stakeholders rel
- Page 165 and 166: StakeholderRiver BasinAuthorities (
- Page 167 and 168: StakeholderWorld VisionWorld FoodPr
- Page 169 and 170: Annex 4: Main policy documents and
- Page 171 and 172: Policy, Plan orProgrammeNational Re
- Page 173 and 174: Policy, Plan orProgrammeComprehensi
- Page 175 and 176: Policy, Plan orProgrammeNational En
- Page 177 and 178: Policy, Plan orProgrammeDraft Natio
- Page 179 and 180: Piece of legislationNational TrustC
- Page 181 and 182: Piece of legislationThe Public Heal
- Page 183 and 184: Piece of legislationTreaty on devel
- Page 185 and 186: Piece of legislationUnited NationsF
- Page 187 and 188: Annex 5: Stakeholder engagement met
- Page 189 and 190: Date Time Place Name Organisation P
- Page 191 and 192: StrEA STUDY PHASEDate Time Place Na
- Page 193 and 194: Annex 7: List of participants to th
- Page 195: Annex 8: Agenda for the stakeholder
- Page 199 and 200: Matsebula, M (2009) EC Accompanying
- Page 201 and 202: Seebaluck, V.; Leal, MRLV; Rosillo-
- Page 203 and 204: Annex 10: Terms of ReferenceTERMS O
- Page 205 and 206: 2.2. Requested services for the fir
- Page 207 and 208: under consideration. The consultant
- Page 209 and 210: 2.5.4. Analysis of performance indi
- Page 211 and 212: • Fluency in both written and spo