Specimens of English literature from the 'Ploughmans crede' to the ...

Specimens of English literature from the 'Ploughmans crede' to the ... Specimens of English literature from the 'Ploughmans crede' to the ...

cch.kcl.ac.uk
from cch.kcl.ac.uk More from this publisher
13.07.2015 Views

,3S6NOTES.which may be considered to be the law of God ' 'in that they are trulylaw fill, arc not so much as named in Scripture at all.6. Lay man, not preest. Pecock was doubtless thinking of Exod. xrv'iii.42, where garments are ordained for the sons of Aaron, but nothing is-aid about the laity.7. Cloke. But doalis are certainly mentioned in Scripture, especiallyin Matt. v. 40, 'let him have thy cloak also,' and in 2 Tim. iv. 13,where St. Paul speaks of lea\-ing his cloqlt at Troas. Pecock generallyquotes from the Wyclifite latei- version. For cloak ' ' in Matt. v. 40Wyclif has ' ouer-clooth.'8. Die wollen cloo\>. But ' dyed garments ' are mentioned in Isaiah Ixiii. i,and dyed ' attire' in Ezekiel xxiii. 15; not to mention the rams' skins'dyed red,' used for the tabernacle, Exod. xxv. 5.10. Ovyn. The mention of an oven in Scripture generally refers to thebaking of bread, but Pecock has surely forgotten the mention of 'a meatofferingbaken in the oven,' Lev. ii. 4.13. Orologis. From Fr. orloges. Pecock here refers to the 'dial ofAhaz,' Isaiah xxxviii. 8.22. Poul. 'See I Cor. xi. 3-10. It need hardly be added that Pecockhas committed an error in this sentence, the k^ovaia of ver. 10 being certainlya veil. Veils are also several times mentioned in the Old Testament.See Kitto, Cycl. Bibl. Lit. s. v. Veil.'—Babington.28. Scbulde not growe. On the other hand, we may recall the stor)^of Samson.29. As wijs; i, e. as wise as thou (a Bible-man) considerest thyself tobe in the Bible. Alluding to the name of Bible-man, frequently given toLollards.33. It may he foujide ; i.e. still, it may be found, and can so be provedthat thou shalt not be able to deny it.43. The booh of worschiping. This work by Pecock, to ^^•hich he alsogives the name of The Book of signis in the chirche, is believed to be nolonger extant.54. Opere place. 'Probably we should read /i/am.'—Babington. Hefrequently handles the same subject in other parts of the 'Repressor.'56. Berdis, beards. The shaving of the beard is, however, expresslymentioned in vScripture. It was a sign of mouniing, as in the case of•fourscore men, having their beards shaven, and their clothes rent,'Jer. xli. 5.63. Lairywe, laugh. This is expressly recognised in Scripture in thetext, ' a time to weep, and a time to laugh ; ' Eccl. iii. 4. So in Luke vi. 2 1'Blessed are ye that weep now ; for ye shall latigh.' Compare Gen.xxi. 6, And Sarah ' said, God hath made me to laugh, so that all that

V. (b) REGINALD PECOCK, 387hear will langh with me; ' also Ps. xxxvii. 13, ' The Lord shall latigh athim,' and the like. Pecock is not happy in his instances.69- Pleie in word bi bourditig, play verbally in jesting, i. e. jest amongstthemselves. But certainly some case might be made out in favour ofjesting, running, &c. from Scripture.Elijah's reproof of the prophets ofBaal (i Kings xviii. 27) partakes much of the nature of jesting; the sunis spoken of as rejoicing ' as a strong man to nin a race,' Ps. xix. 5 ; whilst,as to s-hooting, there is the well-known story of David and Jonathan(i Sam. XX. 35-40), which Pecock seems to have forgotten. See theEnglish editor's preface to 'The Biglow Papers'; Triibner, 1861.76. Esement, i. e. pleasure. But cf. Eccles. ii. 8, where Solomon says'I gathered me also silver and gold, and the peculiar treasure of kingsand of the provinces ;I gat me men singers and women singers, and thedelights of the sons of men, as musical instruments, and that of all sorts.'This is clearly an allusion to other than sacred singing; Solomonintended it for his own eseme?it.S4. Ale or beer. Strong drink is frequently mentioned in the Bible asdistinct from wine, but the use of it is condemned. In Solomon's Songviii. 2, we read, ' I would cause thee to drink of spiced wine of the juiceof my pomegranate,' which alludes to some drink not made from grapes.But the chief point of interest is Pecock's use of the word beer, as it is avery uncommon word in early English, whilst ale is very common. Fourexamples of the former word are given in Stratmann's Early EnglishDictionary, two of them being beore in Layamon, 1. 13542, and ber inKing Horn, ed. Lumby, 1. 11 12. Pecock also mentions cider and mead.93. And i,it ])07i ivolte seie. Here Pecock draws inferences which hisopponents would hardly have admitted.'104. Engliich tunge or langage. After this follows [in the MS.]neither latyn tunge or langage, but a later (?) hand has drawn a pen throughit, rightly. See Luke xxiii. 38. But very possibly Pecock wrote it,since he 'was capable of making such a blunder as to say that a cloak isnot mentioned in Scripture.'—Babington.(B) A defenceof images and pictures.See Babington's edition, vol. i. p. 212. The Wyclifites attackedpictures and images in churches, and the practice of going upon pilgrimage.Pecock defends images on the score of the ease with which theyrecall the stories of the saints represented.10. Purte?iancis, i. e. the special emblems by which various saints areknown. St. Catharine has her wheel, St. Barbara her tower, St. INIargarether dragon, St. Sebastian his arrow, St. Lawrence his gridiron, andso on. See Mrs. Jameson's excellent and most interesting book onC C 2

V. (b) REGINALD PECOCK, 387hear will langh with me; ' also Ps. xxxvii. 13, ' The Lord shall latigh athim,' and <strong>the</strong> like. Pecock is not happy in his instances.69- Pleie in word bi bourditig, play verbally in jesting, i. e. jest amongst<strong>the</strong>mselves. But certainly some case might be made out in favour <strong>of</strong>jesting, running, &c. <strong>from</strong> Scripture.Elijah's repro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prophets <strong>of</strong>Baal (i Kings xviii. 27) partakes much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> jesting; <strong>the</strong> sunis spoken <strong>of</strong> as rejoicing ' as a strong man <strong>to</strong> nin a race,' Ps. xix. 5 ; whilst,as <strong>to</strong> s-hooting, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> well-known s<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> David and Jonathan(i Sam. XX. 35-40), which Pecock seems <strong>to</strong> have forgotten. See <strong>the</strong><strong>English</strong> edi<strong>to</strong>r's preface <strong>to</strong> 'The Biglow Papers'; Triibner, 1861.76. Esement, i. e. pleasure. But cf. Eccles. ii. 8, where Solomon says'I ga<strong>the</strong>red me also silver and gold, and <strong>the</strong> peculiar treasure <strong>of</strong> kingsand <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> provinces ;I gat me men singers and women singers, and <strong>the</strong>delights <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sons <strong>of</strong> men, as musical instruments, and that <strong>of</strong> all sorts.'This is clearly an allusion <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r than sacred singing; Solomonintended it for his own eseme?it.S4. Ale or beer. Strong drink is frequently mentioned in <strong>the</strong> Bible asdistinct <strong>from</strong> wine, but <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> it is condemned. In Solomon's Songviii. 2, we read, ' I would cause <strong>the</strong>e <strong>to</strong> drink <strong>of</strong> spiced wine <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> juice<strong>of</strong> my pomegranate,' which alludes <strong>to</strong> some drink not made <strong>from</strong> grapes.But <strong>the</strong> chief point <strong>of</strong> interest is Pecock's use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word beer, as it is avery uncommon word in early <strong>English</strong>, whilst ale is very common. Fourexamples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> former word are given in Stratmann's Early <strong>English</strong>Dictionary, two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m being beore in Layamon, 1. 13542, and ber inKing Horn, ed. Lumby, 1. 11 12. Pecock also mentions cider and mead.93. And i,it ])07i ivolte seie. Here Pecock draws inferences which hisopponents would hardly have admitted.'104. Engliich tunge or langage. After this follows [in <strong>the</strong> MS.]nei<strong>the</strong>r latyn tunge or langage, but a later (?) hand has drawn a pen throughit, rightly. See Luke xxiii. 38. But very possibly Pecock wrote it,since he 'was capable <strong>of</strong> making such a blunder as <strong>to</strong> say that a cloak isnot mentioned in Scripture.'—Babing<strong>to</strong>n.(B) A defence<strong>of</strong> images and pictures.See Babing<strong>to</strong>n's edition, vol. i. p. 212. The Wyclifites attackedpictures and images in churches, and <strong>the</strong> practice <strong>of</strong> going upon pilgrimage.Pecock defends images on <strong>the</strong> score <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ease with which <strong>the</strong>yrecall <strong>the</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> saints represented.10. Purte?iancis, i. e. <strong>the</strong> special emblems by which various saints areknown. St. Catharine has her wheel, St. Barbara her <strong>to</strong>wer, St. INIargare<strong>the</strong>r dragon, St. Sebastian his arrow, St. Lawrence his gridiron, andso on. See Mrs. Jameson's excellent and most interesting book onC C 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!