13.07.2015 Views

New Urban History Syllabus - USC School of Architecture

New Urban History Syllabus - USC School of Architecture

New Urban History Syllabus - USC School of Architecture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FIRST CLASS: Introduction to the Philosophy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> <strong>History</strong>.! Why not China? Why not Islam? Why did the power <strong>of</strong> Europe (and its excolonies)ended up prevailing in the past millennium?. The class introduces thephilosophical distinctions needed to understand these questions: the distinctionbetween fate and its necessary outcomes, and contingency as a probabilistic conceptthat does not imply either arbitrary nor inconsequential outcomes; the distinctionbetween totalities in which the parts are fused into a seamless whole (leading to theidea that "society creates the individual") and assemblages <strong>of</strong> heterogenous and partlyautonomous components; the distinction between symbolic culture (the culture <strong>of</strong>sacred texts and codes, and their interpretation; <strong>of</strong> political rhetoric; <strong>of</strong> conventions andstandards) and material culture (the culture <strong>of</strong> masons, carpenters, metallurgists,doctors and pharmacist, soldiers).! Required reading for the discussion:! William McNeill. The Pursuit <strong>of</strong> Power.! Chapter 2: The Era <strong>of</strong> Chinese Predominance: 1000-1500.SECOND CLASS: Capitals and Metropolises.! How should we conceptualize cities?. Where in the continuum between individualsand societies should they be located? This class tackles this question by examiningsocial entities smaller than cities (communities, organizations) as well as larger ones(provinces, nation states). It also introduces a basic typology <strong>of</strong> urban centers. Citiesfrom ancient times have engaged in two quite different types <strong>of</strong> activities, onecharacterized by centralized decision-making, the other by multiple decisions made in adecentralized way. Those functions we associate with the government <strong>of</strong> cities are <strong>of</strong>the first type, while those related to trade are <strong>of</strong> the second type. Some urban centerstend to be dominated by one or another <strong>of</strong> these types <strong>of</strong> activities, becoming either thecapital or organizing center <strong>of</strong> a hierarchy <strong>of</strong> towns, on one hand, or a gateway t<strong>of</strong>oreign markets linked into a transnational network, on the other.! Required reading for the discussion:!! Paul M. Hohenberg and Lynn Hollen Lees. The Making <strong>of</strong> <strong>Urban</strong> Europe.! Chapter 2: Systems <strong>of</strong> Early Cities.! Manuel DeLanda. A <strong>New</strong> Philosophy <strong>of</strong> Society.! Chapter 5: Cities and Countries.!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!