13.07.2015 Views

Study of radiation damage in silicon detectors for high ... - F9

Study of radiation damage in silicon detectors for high ... - F9

Study of radiation damage in silicon detectors for high ... - F9

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

60 4. Time Development <strong>of</strong> DefectsSample V 0 FD [V] T eq [n/cm 2 s] eq [n/cm 2 ]K3 6 5 C 1:9 10 9 1:03 10 14K1 32 5 C 3:7 10 11 1:02 10 14K0 32 5 C 1:6 10 12 1:04 10 14P0A,B 8 -10 C 5 10 15 1:12 10 14I3 24 5 C 1:9 10 9 4:4 10 13D3 16 15 C 1:8 10 9 4:2 10 13B3 20 0 C 1:9 10 9 4:4 10 13G3 23 0 C 1:8 10 9 8:3 10 12G2 20 0 C 1:8 10 10 8:7 10 12Table 4.3: List <strong>of</strong> diodes used <strong>in</strong> the study <strong>of</strong> reverse anneal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> N eff with model ts.Full depletion voltage be<strong>for</strong>e ir<strong>radiation</strong>, ir<strong>radiation</strong>/storage temperature, ir<strong>radiation</strong> ux anduence normalised to 1MeV neutrons are given <strong>for</strong> each sample. The thickness <strong>of</strong> samples was3005 m.heat<strong>in</strong>g periods 34 . Though not all samples were irradiated at the same temperature theseeects could be neglected after a few hours at 60 C. Nevertheless, this was accounted <strong>for</strong>,us<strong>in</strong>g equationgiv<strong>in</strong>gk(T )=k 0 e ; Eak BT (4.4)k(T 2 )=k(T 1 )e Eak B( 1T 1; 1T 2 ) : (4.5)Value <strong>of</strong> the activation energy E a <strong>for</strong> the reverse anneal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> N eff is about 1.3 eV [13, 14,15] and <strong>for</strong> anneal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> reverse current about 1.1 eV [15]. Thus, the time development <strong>of</strong>N eff at 60 C is almost 500 times faster than at 20 and <strong>for</strong> time development <strong>of</strong> reversecurrent this factor is about 190.S<strong>in</strong>ce anneal<strong>in</strong>g time constants are much shorter than those <strong>for</strong> the reverse anneal<strong>in</strong>git is possible to study reverse anneal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dependently by wait<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> anneal<strong>in</strong>g tocomplete. The eect <strong>of</strong> reverse anneal<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the time <strong>in</strong>terval <strong>of</strong> benecial anneal<strong>in</strong>gis negligible as can be seen from gures 4.7, 4.5. Thus, assum<strong>in</strong>g anneal<strong>in</strong>g to be completedand us<strong>in</strong>g equations 2.65, 2.57 and 2.61 one can set an ansatz <strong>for</strong> both processesasN eff (t) =g C eq + g Y eq (1 ; e ;kY 1 t ) (4.6)34Due to voltage-source current limit <strong>of</strong> 3 mA <strong>for</strong> some <strong>high</strong>ly irradiated samples the bias voltagedur<strong>in</strong>g heat<strong>in</strong>g was somewhat lower, but never below 140 V.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!