13.07.2015 Views

Study of radiation damage in silicon detectors for high ... - F9

Study of radiation damage in silicon detectors for high ... - F9

Study of radiation damage in silicon detectors for high ... - F9

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22 2. Operation and Radiation Damage <strong>of</strong> Silicon Detectorsdierence is due to the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>of</strong> generation current, caused by additional traps closeto mid-gap, <strong>in</strong>troduced by ir<strong>radiation</strong>. Generation current is thus the ma<strong>in</strong> source <strong>of</strong> thereverse current <strong>in</strong> irradiated samples, so one should expect that temperature dependence<strong>of</strong> the reverse current is follow<strong>in</strong>g equation 2.39.The situation is however dierent if the major contribution to the leakage currentis from traps with <strong>high</strong> concentration but somewhat away from the mid-gap [12]. In thatcase, one <strong>of</strong> the exponential terms<strong>in</strong>cosh<strong>in</strong> eq. 2.36 prevails and one obta<strong>in</strong>sr pair = T ehv eh N CV e ;Eg2k B Te ; 1k B T jE T ; 1 2 (E V +E C )j : (2.40)This could account <strong>for</strong> a <strong>high</strong>er energy (1.2 eV [13, 14, 15] compared to E g =1.1 eV)observed <strong>in</strong> the scal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> reverse current with temperature.2.1.6 N eff from C/V MeasurementsOne can dene the depletion layer capacitance as the ratio <strong>of</strong> dierential change <strong>of</strong> chargeper dierential change <strong>of</strong> applied voltageC(V 0 ) = dQdV j V =V 0: (2.41)In case <strong>of</strong> a one-sided abrupt junction the capacitance is given byC(V )= Si 0 Sw= rSi 0 e 0 N eff2VS (2.42)where Q = e 0 N eff Sw (S is the sample area) was used together with eq. 2.9. It shows that<strong>for</strong> N eff constant over the detector depth, the graph <strong>of</strong> 1=C 2 (V ) versus V is a straightl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>for</strong> reverse voltages below full depleted voltaged(1=C 2 (V ))dV=2e 0 Si 0 N eff S 2 (2.43)and a constant value <strong>for</strong> <strong>high</strong>er voltages. The position <strong>of</strong> the k<strong>in</strong>k determ<strong>in</strong>es FDV andthe slope determ<strong>in</strong>es N eff .A similar set <strong>of</strong> equations can be used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the N eff distribution overthe sample depth from a capacitance versus voltage (C/V) measurement <strong>in</strong> a case <strong>of</strong> anon-uni<strong>for</strong>m distribution. Equation 2.43 can be rewritten [8] asd(1=C 2 (V ))dV=2e 0 Si 0 N eff (V )S 2 (2.44)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!