13.07.2015 Views

Study of radiation damage in silicon detectors for high ... - F9

Study of radiation damage in silicon detectors for high ... - F9

Study of radiation damage in silicon detectors for high ... - F9

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6. Inuence <strong>of</strong> Bias Voltage 101(about a year) is however still long enough to play an important role <strong>for</strong> the detectoroperation <strong>in</strong> the ATLAS environment. A careful plan<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the operation scenario is thusnecessary to obta<strong>in</strong> optimal operation conditions <strong>for</strong> the vertex detector.6.2.2 BistabilityFigure 6.12: Time development <strong>of</strong> N eff <strong>for</strong> both diodes from the S3 set. Samples were keptat room temperature.Bistability <strong>of</strong> the defects, responsible <strong>for</strong> bias dependent anneal<strong>in</strong>g, was checked ondiodes S3. The test was started about 2 months (at 20 C) after the bias <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong>uenceannealed out (see gure 6.12). It can also be seen that both samples have an equal reverseanneal<strong>in</strong>g constant after the anneal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> bias dependent defects was completed. First thediode S3A (biased dur<strong>in</strong>g, unbiased after ir<strong>radiation</strong>) was biased with 200 V <strong>for</strong> about 3weeks and then the bias was switched o. Then the same procedure was repeated <strong>for</strong> thediode S3B (unbiased dur<strong>in</strong>g, biased after ir<strong>radiation</strong>). The results <strong>of</strong> the test are shown<strong>in</strong> gure 6.12. One can see that <strong>for</strong> both samples about a 15% raise <strong>in</strong> N eff appeareddur<strong>in</strong>g the biased time <strong>in</strong>terval, that disappeared with<strong>in</strong> a day after the bias had beenremoved.A similar behaviour was observed with the sample UO6B. After bias dependentdefects annealed out, reverse bias <strong>of</strong> 500 V was applied aga<strong>in</strong>. As shown <strong>in</strong> gure 6.9,N eff started to <strong>in</strong>crease. However, after two weeks, when the raise amounted to about30% <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial dierence, an accidental power cut-o caused the sample to rema<strong>in</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!