Navy Working Capital Fund - DON FM&C Website

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2 ADPE and Telecom Equipment >= $.250M 5 $3.065 4 $2.674 3 $1.250- Computer Hardware (Production) 4 $1.594 3 $1.384 3 $1.250- Computer Software (Operating) 0 $0.000 0 $0.000 0 $0.000- Telecommunications 0 $0.000 0 $0.000 0 $0.000- Oth Computer & Telecom Spt Equip 1 $1.471 1 $1.290 0 $0.0003 Software Development >= $.250M 3 $1.383 0 $0.000 0 $0.000- Projects = or > $1M (List Separately) 0 $0.000 0 $0.000 0 $0.000- Projects < $1M 3 $1.383 0 $0.000 0 $0.0004 Minor Construction (>= $.100M and = $.250M 4 $3.026 2 $1.960 1 $0.760- Replacement Capability 1 $0.400 1 $0.660 0 $0.000- Productivity Capability 1 $1.415 1 $1.300 0 $0.000- New Mission Capability 2 $1.211 0 $0.000 1 $0.760- Environmental Capability 0 $0.000 0 $0.000 0 $0.000
CAPITAL INVESTMENT JUSTIFICATION($ in Thousands)Department of the Navy / Research and Development / Space andNaval Warfare Systems CentersFISCAL YEAR (FY) 2012 BUDGET ESTIMATESFEBRUARY 2011#001 - Non-ADPE and Telecommunications / ReplacementSPAWAR Systems CentersCapabilitiesFY 2010 FY 2011FY 2012Non-ADPE and Telecommunications EquipmentQuant Unit Cost Total Cost Quant Unit Cost Total Cost Quant Unit Cost Total CostReplacement 1 $ 400 $ 4001 $ 660 $ 6600 $ - $ -Total 1 $ 400 $ 4001 $ 660 $ 6600 $ - $ -Justification:Non-ADPE and Telecommunications:REPLACEMENTCurrently, SSC Pacific has limited vibration test capability and thus are unable to fully meet current fleet requirements in the area of non-ADPE and telecommunicationssupport. Their capability is further limited by the age of the equipment, making it necessary to make repeated repairs. The benefit received from the FY 2010 "EnvironmentalTest Facility Vibration/Shock Test Capability Upgrade" project will be a more reliable vibration test capability. The Environmental Test Facility (ETF) supports theConsolidated Production Facility in providing engineering, design, test, evaluation, and qualification support for a variety of Naval Command, Control, Communications,Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) programs in support of Program Executice Office (PEO) C4I & Space tasking. This project will result in a reduction in the need to out-sourceto meet the needs of the Navy. A cost analysis has been performed on this project. There are no anticipated savings or cost avoidance for the ETF CIP Project. This project willreplace older and outdated equipment. Having the necessary equipment on site will allow SPAWAR to perform the work without having to outsource. The savings from inhousetesting will improve efficiencies and offset any cost incurred from this project. Not funding this project will have a critical impact on SSC Pacific's ability to deliverquality C4I products to the fleet, causing them to seek outside vendors.The Building 2A Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) Philadelphia laboratories support PEO C4I ProgramManagement, Warfare 120 (PMW-120) Distributed Common Ground Station – Navy (DCGS-N) and the Joint Services Imagery Processing System that require cooling systems.Existing systems are more than 30 years old and have not received any intermediate upgrades. Systems are no longer sustainable and jeopardize operational support andtesting. The FY 2011 "Install Backup Power & Air Conditioning Units, Philadelphia" project will ugrade the air conditioning (A/C) in the Philadelphia labs, therebyincreasing availibility, decreasing repair costs, and making the systems more environmentally friendly. A cost analysis has been performed on this project. While there are noanticipated savings or cost avoidance anticipated, the operational cost savings realized by installing new energy efficient A/C units will help defray the cost of the unit and thesavings in lost work hours will more than compensate for the cost of the increased reliability. The impact of not making this investment will dramatically increase systemfailures over time and consequently diminish the availability of all of the SPAWAR System Center Command and Intelligence Systems Division Philadelphia labs resulting inlost work hours and risk to testing schedules.Exhibit Fund-9B Capital Investment JustificationNon-ADPE Replacement
Page 1 and 2:
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYFISCAL YEAR (
Page 3:
February 2011NAVY WORKING CAPITAL F
Page 6 and 7:
February 2011ERP is expected to go
Page 8 and 9:
February 2011(Dollars in millions)N
Page 10 and 11:
February 2011Net Operating Results:
Page 13 and 14:
February 2011Customer Rate Changes:
Page 15 and 16:
February 2011Staffing:Total civilia
Page 17 and 18:
February 2011Performance Budgeting.
Page 19 and 20:
February 2011DEPOT MAINTENANCE SIX
Page 23 and 24:
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVY WORKING
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
REVENUE AND EXPENSESDEPARTMENT OF T
Page 31 and 32:
CHANGES IN THE COSTS OF OPERATIONSD
Page 33 and 34:
CAPITAL INVESTMENT SUMMARYDEPARTMEN
Page 35 and 36:
PRODUCTIVITY EQUIPMENT1) The new eq
Page 37 and 38:
REPLACE WALK-IN BLAST BOOTH B794 FR
Page 39 and 40:
UPGRADE F402 TEST CELL FRCE - CHERR
Page 41 and 42:
4) If not acquired, the FRCSE engin
Page 43 and 44:
OTHER COMPUTER & TELECOMMUNICATION
Page 45 and 46:
ACTIVITY GROUP CAPITAL INVESTMENT J
Page 47 and 48:
MATERIAL INVENTORY DATADEPARTMENT O
Page 49 and 50:
MATERIAL INVENTORY DATADEPARTMENT O
Page 53 and 54:
DEPARTMENT OF NAVYNAVY WORKING CAPI
Page 55 and 56:
Revenue: Revenue is $579.7 million
Page 57 and 58:
(Dollars in Millions)Carryover ($M)
Page 59 and 60:
xx,xxx,xxx,xxx xx,xxx,xxx,xxx xx,xx
Page 61 and 62:
Total Cost8 Pricing Adjustments: -2
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYMARINE CORPS
Page 69 and 70:
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYMARINE CORPS
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Performance Indicator:DEPARTMENT OF
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYCHANGES IN CO
Page 82 and 83:
Department of the Navy / Naval Air
Page 84 and 85:
FY2010-FY2012Greater than $1M:EA &
Page 86 and 87:
FY2010-2012Greater than $1M:Operati
Page 88 and 89:
FY2010-2012Greater than $1M:SE & AL
Page 90 and 91:
FY2010-2012Greater than $1M:SE/ALRE
Page 92 and 93:
Capital Investment Justification($
Page 94:
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYCAPITAL BUDGE
Page 98 and 99:
Page 101 and 102: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVY WORKING
Page 103 and 104: Carryover Compliance:DEPARTMENT OF
Page 105 and 106: SOURCES OF NEW ORDERS & REVENUEDEPA
Page 107 and 108: CHANGES IN THE COST OF OPERATIONSDE
Page 109 and 110: Business Area Capital Investment Ju
Page 125 and 126: REVENUE AND EXPENSEDEPARTMENT OF TH
Page 129 and 130: CAPITAL INVESTMENT SUMMARYDEPARTMEN
Page 131 and 132: ACTIVITY GROUP CAPITAL INVESTMENT J
Page 147 and 148: SOURCES OF NEW ORDERS & REVENUEDEPA
Page 149: CHANGES IN THE COST OF OPERATIONSDE
Page 153 and 154: CAPITAL INVESTMENT JUSTIFICATION($
Page 161 and 162: CAPITAL INVESTMENT JUSTIFICATIONFIS
Page 173 and 174: REVENUE AND EXPENSEDEPARTMENT OF TH
Page 177 and 178: CAPITAL INVESTMENT SUMMARYDEPARTMEN
Page 193 and 194: REVENUE AND EXPENSESDEPARTMENT OF T
Page 197 and 198: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYTRANSPORTATIO
Page 201 and 202:
CAPITAL INVESTMENT JUSTIFICATION($
Page 203 and 204:
CAPITAL INVESTMENT JUSTIFICATIONFIS
Page 205 and 206:
CAPITAL INVESTMENT JUSTIFICATIONFIS
Page 207 and 208:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
CHANGES IN THE COST OF OPERATIONSDE
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
CAPITAL BUDGET EXECUTIONDEPARTMENT
Page 227 and 228:
CAPITAL BUDGET EXECUTIONDEPARTMENT
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
xx,xxx,xxx,xxx xx,xxx,xxx,xxx xx,xx
Page 237 and 238:
CHANGES IN THE COST OF OPERATIONSDE
Page 239 and 240:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Fund -9AACTIVITY GROUP CAPITAL INVE
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Fund-9CCAPITAL BUDGET EXECUTIONDEPA
Page 261 and 262:
Fund-9cCAPITAL BUDGET EXECUTIONDEPA
Page 263 and 264:
REVENUE AND EXPENSE SUMMARYDEPARTME
Page 265 and 266:
SUPPLY MANAGEMENT SUMMARYDEPARTMENT
Page 267 and 268:
OPERATING REQUIREMENTS BY WEAPON SY
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
INVENTORY STATUSDEPARTMENT OF THE N
Page 279 and 280:
SM-5BCUSTOMER PRICE CHANGEDEPARTMEN
Page 281 and 282:
SM-5BCustomer Price ChangeDEPARTMEN
Page 283 and 284:
WAR RESERVE MATERIAL (WRM)DEPARMENT
Page 285 and 286:
WAR RESERVE MATERIAL (WRM)DEPARMENT
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
FUEL DATADEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYSUPP
Page 299 and 300:
SUPPLY MANAGEMENT SUMMARY BY DIVISI
Page 301 and 302:
SUPPLY MANAGEMENT SUMMARY BY DIVISI
Page 303 and 304:
OPERATING REQUIREMENT BY WEAPON SYS
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
WAR RESERVE MATERIALDEPARTMENT OF T
Page 315 and 316:
WAR RESERVE MATERIALDEPARTMENT OF T
show all

Navy Working Capital Fund - DON FM&C Website

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?