TRADOC Pam 525-3-7-01 - TRADOC - U.S. Army

TRADOC Pam 525-3-7-01Required CapabilitiesTRADOC Pamphlet 525-3-3, chapter 5, contains required capabilities across all the domainsof DOTMLPF for the battle command function. Reproduced here include those pertaining toleader development and education. Future Modular Force leadership development programs willrequire the capability to provide-Data, information, and knowledge management solutions to understand the risks,including information overload, and benefits of any particular architecture they engage inthe course of an operation.The ability to co-evolve with all the other joint C2 enablers, so that leadershipdevelopment keeps pace with the impact of the other enablers. The means to allow leaders to grow and develop trust experience. Attaining trustexperience through extensive use of simulation, scenario-driven war games andexperiments, and training exercises that challenge leaders will reduce the tendency tolearn “on the job” in actual combat operations.Senior leaders who allow space, so subordinates can experiment within the bounds ofintent based orders and plans, and who are willing to take calculated risks and accept thepossibility that less experienced subordinates will make mistakes.Self learning through professional reading and professional military education.Emerging computer based war games and simulations molded to teach the art and scienceof war.Education and leadership development programs for Army officers for operational levelcommand and staff.The junior leaders of the future Modular Force, such as young captains and junior NCOs,are approximately 10 years old today. As these pre-adolescents mature, they will adoptgeneral characteristics that distinguish them from previous generations. Future ModularForce commanders must be aware of such generational differences when applying theArmy’s time honored leadership principles.Questions for Further ExaminationShould the Army institute a command tracking system to focus on those who are bestsuited to command?How can the Army capitalize on leadership studies and efforts underway in other services,academia (social sciences), government, and other countries?What tools and policies can assist the Army in early identification of individuals withleadership and command potential?How can the Army strike a balance in officer and NCO career development progress toprovide opportunities to study language, culture, or other personal enrichment subjects?How can the Army best prepare today’s young leaders to cope with tomorrow’schallenges?What criteria beyond technical tactical competence should a selection board consider forcommand candidates?Can selection boards get an indicator of adaptability, empathy, or other human dimensionqualities required of future leaders?200