13.07.2015 Views

VEGF-A Links Angiogenesis and Inflammation in Inflammatory ...

VEGF-A Links Angiogenesis and Inflammation in Inflammatory ...

VEGF-A Links Angiogenesis and Inflammation in Inflammatory ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GASTROENTEROLOGY 2009;136:585–595<strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>L<strong>in</strong>ks</strong> <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Inflammation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Inflammatory</strong> BowelDisease PathogenesisFRANCO SCALDAFERRI,* ,‡ STEFANIA VETRANO,* MIQUEL SANS, § VINCENZO ARENA, GIUSEPPE STRAFACE, ‡EGIDIO STIGLIANO, ALESSANDRO REPICI,* ANDREAS STURM, ALBERTO MALESCI,* JULIAN PANES, §SEPPO YLA–HERTTUALA, # CLAUDIO FIOCCHI,** <strong>and</strong> SILVIO DANESE**Division of Gastroenterology, Istituto Cl<strong>in</strong>ico Humanitas, University of Milan, Milan; ‡ Department of Internal Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Catholic University, Rome, Italy; § Division ofGastroenterology, Hospital Cl<strong>in</strong>ic, Barcelona, Spa<strong>in</strong>; Department of Pathology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy; Division of Gastroenterology, Charite Hospital, Berl<strong>in</strong>,Germany; # Department of Biotechnology <strong>and</strong> Molecular Medic<strong>in</strong>e, AI Virtanen Institute, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong>; **Department of Pathobiology, TheClevel<strong>and</strong> Cl<strong>in</strong>ic, Clevel<strong>and</strong>, OhioSee Roifman I et al on page 175 <strong>in</strong> CGH; seeeditorial on page 400.Background & Aims: Vascular endothelial growthfactor A (<strong>VEGF</strong>-A) mediates angiogenesis <strong>and</strong>might also have a role <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammation <strong>and</strong> immunity.We exam<strong>in</strong>ed whether <strong>VEGF</strong>-A signal<strong>in</strong>g has arole <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammatory bowel disease (IBD).Methods: Expression levels of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A, <strong>and</strong> its receptors<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>and</strong> <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2, were exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>samples from patients with IBD <strong>and</strong> compared withthose of controls. The capacity of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A to <strong>in</strong>duceangiogenesis was tested <strong>in</strong> human <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al microvascularendothelial cells us<strong>in</strong>g cell-migration <strong>and</strong>matrigel tubule-formation assays. Levels of vascularcellular adhesion molecule-1 <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tercellularadhesion molecule were measured by flow cytometryto determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>duction of <strong>in</strong>flammation; neutrophiladhesion was also assayed. Expression patternswere determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> tissues from mice withdextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-<strong>in</strong>duced colitis; theeffects of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A overexpression <strong>and</strong> blockadewere assessed <strong>in</strong> these mice by adenoviral transferof <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong> soluble <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1. Intest<strong>in</strong>al angiogenesiswas measured by quantitative CD31 sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<strong>and</strong> leukocyte adhesion <strong>in</strong> vivo by <strong>in</strong>travitalmicroscopy. Results: Levels of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong><strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> samples from patients withIBD <strong>and</strong> colitic mice. <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong>duced angiogenesisof human <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al microvascular endothelial cells<strong>in</strong> vitro as well as an <strong>in</strong>flammatory phenotype <strong>and</strong>adherence of neutrophils to <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al endothelium.Overexpression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong> mice with DSS<strong>in</strong>ducedcolitis worsened their condition, whereasoverexpression of soluble <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 had the oppositeeffect. Furthermore, overexpression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong>creasedmucosal angiogenesis <strong>and</strong> stimulated leukocyteadhesion <strong>in</strong> vivo. Conclusions: <strong>VEGF</strong>-A appearsto be a novel mediator of IBD by promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>alangiogenesis <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammation. Agents that block<strong>VEGF</strong>-A signal<strong>in</strong>g might reduce <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>flammation<strong>in</strong> patients with IBD.<strong>Inflammatory</strong> bowel disease (IBD) pathogenesis <strong>in</strong>volvesthe <strong>in</strong>terplay of multiple biologic components,among which nonimmune cells play a crucial role. 1–3 Inparticular, endothelial cells play a key role <strong>in</strong> multipleaspects of chronic <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>flammation, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g expressionof cell adhesion molecules (CAM) <strong>and</strong> chemok<strong>in</strong>esecretion, recruitment of leukocytes <strong>and</strong> platelets,acquisition of a prothrombotic phenotype, <strong>and</strong> throughimmune-driven angiogenesis. 4,5 <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> is thereforea complex process mediated by multiple cell types <strong>and</strong>mediators 6,7 <strong>and</strong> is fundamental to many biologic processes,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g growth, development, <strong>and</strong> repair.Besides its well-known role <strong>in</strong> cancer, it has becomeclear that angiogenesis is also an <strong>in</strong>tegral component ofa diverse range of nonneoplastic chronic <strong>in</strong>flammatory<strong>and</strong> autoimmune diseases, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g atherosclerosis,rheumatoid arthritis, diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy, psoriasis, airway<strong>in</strong>flammation, peptic ulcers, <strong>and</strong> Alzheimer’s disease.6,8,9 Indeed, angiogenesis is <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic to chronic <strong>in</strong>flammation<strong>and</strong> is associated with structural changes,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g activation <strong>and</strong> proliferation of endothelialcells, <strong>and</strong> capillary <strong>and</strong> venule remodel<strong>in</strong>g, all of whichresult <strong>in</strong> expansion of the tissue microvascular bed. 10–12 Apotential functional consequence of this expansion is thepromotion of <strong>in</strong>flammation through various correlatedmechanisms. First, <strong>in</strong>flux of <strong>in</strong>flammatory cells may <strong>in</strong>crease;second, there is an <strong>in</strong>creased nutrient supply tothe metabolically active immune process; <strong>and</strong>, third, theactivated endothelium contributes to the local productionof cytok<strong>in</strong>es, chemok<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>and</strong> matrix metallopro-Abbreviations used <strong>in</strong> this paper: CD, Crohn’s disease; CAM, celladhesion molecules; HIMEC, human <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al microvascular endothelialcell; ICAM, <strong>in</strong>tercellular adhesion molecule; UC, ulcerative colitis;VCAM, vascular cellular adhesion molecule; <strong>VEGF</strong>-A, vascular endothelialgrowth factor A; <strong>VEGF</strong>R, <strong>VEGF</strong> receptor.© 2009 by the AGA Institute0016-5085/09/$36.00doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.064BASIC–ALIMENTARY TRACT


586 SCALDAFERRI ET AL GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 136, No. 2BASIC–ALIMENTARY TRACTte<strong>in</strong>ases. 13,14 The anatomic expansion of the microvascularbed comb<strong>in</strong>ed with its <strong>in</strong>creased functional activationcan therefore foster further recruitment of <strong>in</strong>flammatorycells, <strong>and</strong> angiogenesis <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammation become chronicallycodependent processes. 10,12,14,15 In addition, manyof the mediators that are fundamental players <strong>in</strong> angiogenesisare also <strong>in</strong>flammatory molecules. 16,17The angiogenic role played by the pathways <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>gthe vascular endothelial growth factors (<strong>VEGF</strong>s) <strong>and</strong>their receptors is well characterized. There are 7 membersof the <strong>VEGF</strong> family, ie, <strong>VEGF</strong>-A, -B, -C, -D, -E, -F, <strong>and</strong>placental growth factor, <strong>and</strong> these each <strong>in</strong>teract withspecific receptors, such as <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 (flt-1), <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2(KDR), <strong>and</strong> <strong>VEGF</strong>R-3. 18,19 <strong>VEGF</strong>-A is the best characterized7,20,21 <strong>and</strong> is a fundamental mediator of pathologicangiogenesis, such as <strong>in</strong> neoplasia <strong>and</strong> chronic <strong>in</strong>flammation.Indeed, targeted blockade of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A is currentlybe<strong>in</strong>g used as a therapeutic approach to block angiogenesis<strong>in</strong> malignant tumors. 22,23<strong>VEGF</strong>-A is crucially <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> several chronic <strong>in</strong>flammatorydisorders, 24–28 <strong>in</strong> which <strong>VEGF</strong>-A not only promotespathologic angiogenesis but directly fosters <strong>in</strong>flammation.7,18,25,26 It is now well established that, <strong>in</strong>diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, atherosclerosis,<strong>and</strong> chronic lung <strong>in</strong>flammation, <strong>VEGF</strong>-A is <strong>in</strong>timately<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> disease pathogenesis, <strong>and</strong> target<strong>in</strong>g<strong>VEGF</strong>-A is a promis<strong>in</strong>g new therapeutic strategy todampen <strong>in</strong>flammation. 7,9,18,27–32Studies from our laboratory <strong>and</strong> others have shownthat angiogenesis is a novel component of both ulcerativecolitis (UC) <strong>and</strong> Crohn’s disease (CD) <strong>and</strong> that target<strong>in</strong>gangiogenesis by <strong>in</strong>tegr<strong>in</strong> v3 blockade is an effective<strong>and</strong> entirely novel approach to block experimental colitis.33–36 However, the specific mediators <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> immune-drivenangiogenesis associated with IBD are stillpoorly def<strong>in</strong>ed. 37A few reports have described overexpression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A<strong>in</strong> humans with IBD, 4,37 but the functional significanceof such up-regulation is not yet understood. In addition,the messenger RNA (mRNA) for <strong>VEGF</strong>-A is stronglyup-regulated <strong>in</strong> animals with chronic experimental colitis.35 In mur<strong>in</strong>e colonic-derived endothelial cells, <strong>VEGF</strong>-Atriggers an <strong>in</strong>flammatory phenotype by up-regulat<strong>in</strong>gCAMs <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g adhesion of neutrophils <strong>and</strong> T cells,thus support<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>flammatory role for this cytok<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e. 38 However, thus far, <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong> its receptorshave not been fully characterized <strong>in</strong> patients withIBD nor has the functional role of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A been studied<strong>in</strong> these patients.We have therefore evaluated the role of the <strong>VEGF</strong>-Apathway 39 <strong>in</strong> the pathogenesis of IBD. Here, we show that<strong>VEGF</strong>-A is up-regulated <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>volved tissues <strong>in</strong> humanswith IBD <strong>and</strong> colitic mice, as is its receptor <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2, butnot <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1. In vitro, <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong>duces both angiogenicactivity <strong>and</strong> an <strong>in</strong>flammatory phenotype <strong>in</strong> human <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>almicrovascular endothelial cells (HIMEC), whereasoverexpression <strong>in</strong> vivo <strong>in</strong>creases disease severity <strong>and</strong>blockade decreases disease severity <strong>in</strong> colitic mice. This <strong>in</strong>vivo effect correlated with <strong>in</strong>creased or decreased angiogenesis,respectively. In addition, <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong>duced recruitmentof leukocytes to the <strong>in</strong>flamed <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> vivo,thus foster<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>flammation. These results strongly supportthe important role played by the <strong>VEGF</strong> pathway <strong>in</strong>both <strong>in</strong>flammation <strong>and</strong> the angiogenesis that underliesdisease pathogenesis <strong>in</strong> IBD.Materials <strong>and</strong> MethodsFor additional <strong>in</strong>formation on materials <strong>and</strong>methods, see supplementary materials <strong>and</strong> methods section(see supplementary materials <strong>and</strong> methods onl<strong>in</strong>e atwww.gastrojournal.org).Patient PopulationPatients with active <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>active CD <strong>and</strong> UC werestudied, <strong>and</strong> healthy <strong>in</strong>dividuals were enrolled as controls.Patients <strong>and</strong> controls were recruited at the Divisionof Gastroenterology, Istituto Cl<strong>in</strong>ico Humanitas, Milan,Italy, <strong>and</strong> the study was approved by the InstitutionalReview Board. Ethical guidel<strong>in</strong>es were followed by the<strong>in</strong>vestigator <strong>in</strong> studies on humans or animals <strong>and</strong> described<strong>in</strong> the paper. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical disease activity was assessedby the Harvey–Bradshaw Activity Index <strong>and</strong> the ColitisActivity Index, as previously reported. 33 All diagnoseswere confirmed by cl<strong>in</strong>ical, radiologic, endoscopic, <strong>and</strong>histologic criteria.Immunosta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of Mucosal Expression of<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>and</strong> -2 <strong>in</strong> Human <strong>and</strong> Mur<strong>in</strong>eColonic Tissues <strong>and</strong> CD31 <strong>in</strong> Mur<strong>in</strong>e ColonicTissuesImmunosta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was performed as previously described40 (see supplementary materials <strong>and</strong> methods onl<strong>in</strong>eat www.gastrojournal.org).Isolation <strong>and</strong> Culture of HIMECHIMEC were isolated as previously described 41(see supplementary materials <strong>and</strong> methods onl<strong>in</strong>e at www.gastrojournal.org).Western Blott<strong>in</strong>g AnalysisImmunoblott<strong>in</strong>g was performed as previously described42 (see supplementary materials <strong>and</strong> methods onl<strong>in</strong>eat www.gastrojournal.org).Tubule Formation <strong>and</strong> Migration AssayEndothelial cell tube formation was assessed us<strong>in</strong>gMatrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), as previouslydescribed 36 (see supplementary materials <strong>and</strong> methodsonl<strong>in</strong>e at www.gastrojournal.org). Chemotaxis was assessedas previously reported 40,43 (see supplementary materials<strong>and</strong> methods onl<strong>in</strong>e at www.gastrojournal.org).


February 2009 THE PATHOGENIC ROLE OF <strong>VEGF</strong>-A IN IBD 587Analysis of HIMEC by Flow CytometryDetection of expression of <strong>in</strong>tercellular adhesionmolecule (ICAM)-1 <strong>and</strong> vascular cell adhesion molecule(VCAM)-1 on HIMEC was performed by flow cytometryas previously described 44 (see supplementary materials<strong>and</strong> methods onl<strong>in</strong>e at www.gastrojournal.org).Induction of Colitis <strong>in</strong> Mice <strong>and</strong>Overexpression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong> s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1Us<strong>in</strong>g AdenovirusColitis was <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> C57BL/6N mice by adm<strong>in</strong>istrationof 2.5% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) (molecularmass, 40 kilodaltons; MP Biomedicals, Clevel<strong>and</strong>, OH)<strong>in</strong> filter-purified (Millipore Corporate, Billerica, MA)dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water for 10 days. The severity of colitis wasassessed on a daily measurement of weight loss 34,45 (seesupplementary materials <strong>and</strong> methods onl<strong>in</strong>e at www.gastrojournal.org).Eng<strong>in</strong>eered adenovirus encod<strong>in</strong>g <strong>VEGF</strong>-A (ph<strong>VEGF</strong> 165 ),soluble <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 (s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1), or vector alone (LacZ) werethe generous gift of S. Yla–Herttuala <strong>and</strong> R. Pola <strong>and</strong> weregenerated as previously reported 46–51 (see supplementarymaterials <strong>and</strong> methods onl<strong>in</strong>e at www.gastrojournal.org).HIMEC-Neutrophil Adhesion Assay <strong>and</strong>Intravital Microscopy StudiesAdhesion assays were performed as previously reported44,45 (see supplementary materials <strong>and</strong> methodsonl<strong>in</strong>e at www.gastrojournal.org). Intravital microscopyexperiments were performed as previously described 45(see supplementary materials <strong>and</strong> methods onl<strong>in</strong>e at www.gastrojournal.org).Statistical AnalysisFor statistical analysis, see supplementary materials<strong>and</strong> methods (see supplementary materials <strong>and</strong> methodsonl<strong>in</strong>e at www.gastrojournal.org).ResultsMucosal <strong>and</strong> Plasma Levels of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A AreUp-Regulated <strong>in</strong> Patients With IBDTo compare the expression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A underphysiologic conditions <strong>and</strong> chronic <strong>in</strong>flammation, weFigure 1. Expression of the <strong>VEGF</strong>-A prote<strong>in</strong> is up-regulated <strong>in</strong> themucosa <strong>and</strong> plasma of patients with IBD. Control (n 16) or actively<strong>in</strong>flamed CD (n 15) <strong>and</strong> UC (n 16) patients were <strong>in</strong>vestigated for<strong>VEGF</strong> mucosal content <strong>in</strong> mucosal extracts (A) or <strong>in</strong> plasma (B). <strong>VEGF</strong>was measured by ELISA. *P .001 for UC <strong>and</strong> CD compared withcontrol.first measured the levels of the <strong>VEGF</strong>-A prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>mucosal extracts from patients with active IBD <strong>and</strong>control <strong>in</strong>dividuals, us<strong>in</strong>g quantitative enzyme-l<strong>in</strong>kedimmunosorbent assays (ELISA) of homogenized tissuesamples (Figure 1A). The levels of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong> the mucosaof patients with either CD or UC were markedly(P .05) enhanced compared with control <strong>in</strong>dividuals.In addition, we also measured the levels of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A<strong>in</strong> the plasma of control <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> comparedthose with that of patients with active CD or UC(Figure 1B). Aga<strong>in</strong>, there was a significant <strong>in</strong>crease (P .05) <strong>in</strong> the levels of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong> the plasma of patientswith either form of IBD. <strong>VEGF</strong>-A was therefore upregulatedat both the systemic <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al levels <strong>in</strong>patients with IBD.<strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 Is Up-Regulated, Whereas Levels of<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 Rema<strong>in</strong> Unchanged <strong>in</strong> the Mucosaof Patients With IBDHav<strong>in</strong>g demonstrated that <strong>VEGF</strong>-A is up-regulated<strong>in</strong> the mucosa of patents with IBD, we next <strong>in</strong>vestigatedthe expression of its 2 receptors: <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>and</strong> -2.First, we performed immunohistochemical sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ofmucosal tissues from healthy control <strong>in</strong>dividuals, <strong>and</strong> the<strong>in</strong>flamed mucosa of patients with CD <strong>and</strong> UC. Endothelialcells <strong>in</strong> the colonic mucosa of both control <strong>in</strong>dividuals<strong>and</strong> actively <strong>in</strong>flamed tissues from patients with IBDwere positive for <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 immunosta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (Figure 2A),with no apparent differences <strong>in</strong> expression levels betweenthe control (2.4 0.2) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>flamed CD (2.3 0.2) <strong>and</strong>UC (2.4 0.2) mucosa.To def<strong>in</strong>e the cell types on which <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 was expressed,serial sections were immunosta<strong>in</strong>ed for the follow<strong>in</strong>gmarkers: CD31 (endothelial cells), CD68 (macrophages),CD3 (T cells), CD11C (dendritic cells), <strong>and</strong> MPO(neutrophils). As shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2, <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 immunolocalizedwith CD31, CD68, <strong>and</strong> epithelial cells, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>gthat expression of <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 is ma<strong>in</strong>ly found <strong>in</strong> theendothelium, macrophages, <strong>and</strong> epithelial cells. 18 No difference<strong>in</strong> expression level was found between control<strong>and</strong> IBD tissues. CD3-, CD11C-, <strong>and</strong> myeloperoxidasepositivecells were negative for colocalization with<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 (data not shown). Next, we <strong>in</strong>vestigated<strong>VEGF</strong>R-2, the <strong>in</strong>ducible receptor for <strong>VEGF</strong>-A. 18 Us<strong>in</strong>g thesame serial sections used for <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 immunosta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g,we found that <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 was also expressed by the endothelialmicrovasculature (CD31), macrophages (CD68),<strong>and</strong> epithelial cells, as reported <strong>in</strong> Figure 2B. <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2was expressed at low levels <strong>in</strong> the microvasculature ofcontrol mucosa (0.7 0.2), but its expression wasstrongly up-regulated <strong>in</strong> actively <strong>in</strong>flamed CD (2.0 0.2,P .01) <strong>and</strong> UC (1.9 0.3, P .01) mucosa (Figure 2B).The number of positive macrophages was higher <strong>in</strong> IBDtissues, but no differences <strong>in</strong> the expression level wereobserved between control <strong>and</strong> IBD tissues. No differencewas found also <strong>in</strong> the expression of <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 by epithe-BASIC–ALIMENTARY TRACT


588 SCALDAFERRI ET AL GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 136, No. 2BASIC–ALIMENTARY TRACTFigure 2. <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 but not <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 is up-regulated <strong>in</strong> human IBD. (A) The panels show brown immunohistochemical sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1, CD31,<strong>and</strong> CD68 <strong>in</strong> serial sections of the colonic mucosa <strong>and</strong> submucosa from histologically normal control (a, c, e), active IBD (b, d, f). Orig<strong>in</strong>almagnification, 10. (B) The panels show brown immunohistochemical sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2, CD31, <strong>and</strong> CD68 <strong>in</strong> serial sections of the colonicmucosa <strong>and</strong> submucosa from histologically normal control (a, c, e; orig<strong>in</strong>al magnification, 10), active UC, <strong>and</strong> active CD tissue (b, d, f; magnification,40). The panels are representative of 10 control, 9 UC, <strong>and</strong> 12 CD samples, respectively. Red arrows <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al microvasculature. (C)HIMEC were left unstimulated or stimulated with <strong>VEGF</strong>-A or TNF- then lysed <strong>and</strong> their expression of <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>and</strong> -2 assessed by Western blott<strong>in</strong>g.lial cells between controls <strong>and</strong> IBD. No differences werefound between un<strong>in</strong>flamed IBD <strong>and</strong> control mucosa(data not shown).The levels of expression of the 2 receptors were also<strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> cultured HIMEC by Western blot analysis<strong>and</strong> quantified by densitometry. HIMEC constitutivelyexpressed <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>in</strong> unstimulated cultures(0.91 0.05), with no <strong>in</strong>crease when cultures werestimulated with <strong>VEGF</strong>-A (0.99 0.02) or tumor necrosisfactor (TNF)- (0.88 0.01) (Figure 2C). Incontrast to <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1, both <strong>VEGF</strong>-A (1.053 0.02) <strong>and</strong>TNF- (1.027 0.02) <strong>in</strong>duced significant (P .05)up-regulation of the expression of <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 onHIMEC (0.61 0.02) (Figure 2B). There was therefore


February 2009 THE PATHOGENIC ROLE OF <strong>VEGF</strong>-A IN IBD 589no evidence for a change <strong>in</strong> the levels of <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>in</strong>response to pro<strong>in</strong>flammatory stimuli, or <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>flamedmucosa, whereas <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 was clearly overexpressed<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>flamed mucosa, <strong>and</strong> its expression was<strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> response to pro<strong>in</strong>flammatory stimuli.<strong>VEGF</strong>-A Induces Angiogenic Activity ofHIMEC In VitroTo assess whether <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>and</strong> -2 expressed onHIMEC are functional, we <strong>in</strong>vestigated the capacity of<strong>VEGF</strong>-A to <strong>in</strong>duce angiogenesis. We first determ<strong>in</strong>ed theability of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A to <strong>in</strong>duce angiogenesis <strong>in</strong> vitro us<strong>in</strong>g aMatrigel tubule formation assay (Figure 3A). UnstimulatedHIMEC failed to form tubules, whereas <strong>VEGF</strong>-Areadily promoted tubule formation. The specificity ofthis response was confirmed by the application of ananti-<strong>VEGF</strong> antibody simultaneously with <strong>VEGF</strong>-A, whichreduced tubule formation.Next, we <strong>in</strong>vestigated the functional capacity of<strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong> mucosal extracts from control <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong>patients with IBD to <strong>in</strong>duce migration of HIMEC <strong>in</strong> vitro(Figure 3B <strong>and</strong> C). No significant difference was observedbetween unstimulated HIMEC <strong>and</strong> HIMEC stimulatedwith mucosal extracts from control <strong>in</strong>dividuals. However,Figure 3. <strong>VEGF</strong>-A mediates angiogenesis <strong>in</strong> mucosal endothelial cells<strong>in</strong> vitro, caus<strong>in</strong>g both formation of tubules <strong>and</strong> migration of culturedHIMEC. (A) Tubule formation assays were performed with Matrigel.HIMEC were left untreated, or stimulated with <strong>VEGF</strong>, <strong>in</strong> the presence orabsence of anti-<strong>VEGF</strong>-A block<strong>in</strong>g antibodies, sta<strong>in</strong>ed with calce<strong>in</strong>. Resultsare representative of 4 <strong>in</strong>dependent experiments. Five high-powerfields per culture condition were exam<strong>in</strong>ed at magnification 40. (B <strong>and</strong>C) HIMEC were seeded on a transwell <strong>in</strong>sert <strong>and</strong> left untreated, exposedto several doses of recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>VEGF</strong>-A, or to a 1:10 concentration ofextracts from normal or IBD mucosa (3 CD <strong>and</strong> 3 UC). Experimentswere carried out <strong>in</strong> the absence <strong>and</strong> presence of block<strong>in</strong>g antibodiesaga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>VEGF</strong>-A. Migrated cells were labeled with calce<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> counted.Data are derived from 6 separate experiments. *P .05 for anti-<strong>VEGF</strong>treatedcompared with untreated IBD mucosal extracts.mucosal extracts from patients with IBD potently <strong>in</strong>ducedmigration of HIMEC (P .01). This <strong>in</strong>duction wassignificant (P .05), although not completely dependenton the presence of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong> the mucosal extracts frompatients with IBD because application of an anti-<strong>VEGF</strong>antibody at the same time as the mucosal extracts reducedthe migration of the HIMEC.<strong>VEGF</strong>-A Induces an <strong>Inflammatory</strong> Phenotype<strong>in</strong> HIMECWe also <strong>in</strong>vestigated whether <strong>VEGF</strong>-A has thecapacity to <strong>in</strong>duce a pro<strong>in</strong>flammatory phenotype <strong>in</strong>HIMEC. We first measured the expression of vascularICAM-1 <strong>and</strong> VCAM-1. Unstimulated HIMEC constitutivelyexpressed ICAM-1, but expression was stronglyup-regulated (3- to 4-fold <strong>in</strong>crease) by exposure to<strong>VEGF</strong>-A (Figure 4A). By contrast, unstimulated HIMECexpressed very low levels of VCAM-1, <strong>and</strong> no up-regulation<strong>in</strong> expression was observed after stimulation with<strong>VEGF</strong>-A (data not shown). On the other h<strong>and</strong>, when asimilar concentration of TNF- was used as positivecontrol, the expression of ICAM-1 <strong>and</strong> VCAM-1 was <strong>in</strong>creasedby up to 5- to 6- <strong>and</strong> 50- to 60-folds, respectively,over basel<strong>in</strong>e expression levels (data not shown). Next, wequantified the adhesion of neutrophils to <strong>VEGF</strong>-A-stimulatedHIMEC. Unstimulated HIMEC bound few neutrophils(54 11 cells/field), but this number significantly(622 56 cells/field, P .001) <strong>in</strong>creased after stimulationwith <strong>VEGF</strong>-A (Figure 4B). TNF- (50 ng/mL) <strong>in</strong>duceda further <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> neutrophil adhesion (918 40 cells/field, not shown). Addition of an antibody thatblocked endothelial ICAM-1 significantly (217 16 cells/field, P .05) decreased neutrophil adhesion, demonstrat<strong>in</strong>ga functional role for ICAM-1 <strong>in</strong> <strong>VEGF</strong>-A-dependentneutrophil adhesion (Figure 4B). Control antibodiesfailed to <strong>in</strong>hibit the <strong>in</strong>duction of adhesion of neutrophilsto HIMEC by <strong>VEGF</strong>-A or TNF- (data not shown).The <strong>VEGF</strong> Pathway Is Also Activated <strong>in</strong> MiceWith DSS-Induced Colitis, With Up-Regulationof <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong> <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 But Not <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1To <strong>in</strong>vestigate the mucosal expression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-Adur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>duction of experimental colitis, we measuredthe levels of the <strong>VEGF</strong>-A prote<strong>in</strong> at different timepo<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> mucosal extracts of mice adm<strong>in</strong>istered 2.5%DSS. As measured by Western blot, <strong>VEGF</strong>-A was expressed<strong>in</strong> healthy mice, but its expression was markedlyenhanced dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>duction of colitis (Figure 5A). Wenext <strong>in</strong>vestigated the expression levels of <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>and</strong> -2by immunohistochemical sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of mucosal tissuesfrom control <strong>and</strong> DSS colitic mice. Colonic mucosa fromthe control mice showed a physiologic (2.5 0.2) vascularimmunosta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 (Figure 5B), with asimilar degree of immunoreactivity detected <strong>in</strong> the colonicmucosa of DSS-treated mice (2.4 0.3). On thecontrary, <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 was expressed at very low levels <strong>in</strong> themicrovasculature of normal mice (0.4 0.2), but itsBASIC–ALIMENTARY TRACT


590 SCALDAFERRI ET AL GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 136, No. 2BASIC–ALIMENTARY TRACTFigure 4. <strong>VEGF</strong>-A triggers an <strong>in</strong>flammatory phenotype <strong>in</strong> HIMEC <strong>in</strong> vitro by <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g expression of ICAM-1, as well as ICAM-1-dependent neutrophiladhesion. (A) HIMEC were left untreated or stimulated with <strong>VEGF</strong>-A. After 24 hours, expression of ICAM-1 was measured by flow cytometry. Theblack curve represents the background signal from the isotype control. The Figure is representative of 5 separate experiments. Numbers representthe net percentage of positive cells. (B) HIMEC were left untreated (basel<strong>in</strong>e) or stimulated with <strong>VEGF</strong>-A, with or without monoclonal antibodiesaga<strong>in</strong>st ICAM-1. Calce<strong>in</strong>-labeled neutrophils were added to the HIMEC monolayers. The number of adherent cells/mm 2 <strong>in</strong> each experimentalcondition was expressed as mean SEM of 5 separate experiments. *P .05 for <strong>VEGF</strong> stimulated HIMEC vs untreated HIMEC or vs anti-ICAM-1treated HIMEC.expression was strongly up-regulated (2.3 0.3, P .001) <strong>in</strong> the actively <strong>in</strong>flamed mucosa of DSS colitic mice(Figure 5B). These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs mirror those observed <strong>in</strong>humans, as described above.In Vivo Manipulation of the Expression of<strong>VEGF</strong>-A Affects the Course of ExperimentalColitisTo <strong>in</strong>vestigate whether <strong>VEGF</strong>-A plays a key role <strong>in</strong>the pathogenesis of experimental colitis, we undertook aseries of experiments us<strong>in</strong>g adenovirus constructs tooverexpress <strong>VEGF</strong>-A or a soluble form of its receptor<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 (s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1). This experimental approach hasbeen successfully used <strong>in</strong> several disease models but not<strong>in</strong> experimental IBD. 50,52–54 Initially, we transfectedhealthy mice with the adenovirus encod<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>VEGF</strong>-Aor a control adenovirus, both of which have previouslybeen described. 46–51 The mice were killed every other day<strong>and</strong> compared with control adenovirus-<strong>in</strong>fected mice. Wefound that the plasma of animals that received the<strong>VEGF</strong>-A-encod<strong>in</strong>g adenovirus conta<strong>in</strong>ed high <strong>and</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>edlevels of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong> s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 (see supplementaryFigure 1A <strong>and</strong> B onl<strong>in</strong>e at www.gastrojournal.org).To determ<strong>in</strong>e whether the virus localizes to the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e,we transfected mice with adenovirus-LacZ <strong>and</strong> immunosta<strong>in</strong>edthe gut with X-gal. Mice transfected with the<strong>VEGF</strong>-A adenovirus displayed <strong>in</strong>tense X-gal sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>their mucosa, <strong>in</strong>dicative of LacZ expression, whereas noX-gal sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was observed <strong>in</strong> the mice transfected withthe control adenovirus (data not shown). In addition, toverify whether the <strong>VEGF</strong>-A expressed by the transfectedvirus caused a significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> levels of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A atthe tissue level, we analyzed mucosal prote<strong>in</strong> extractsderived from mice transfected with control or <strong>VEGF</strong>-Aadenovirus by Western blot. <strong>VEGF</strong>-A was also more abundantlyexpressed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e of the healthy <strong>VEGF</strong>-Aadenovirus-transfected mice compared with control adenovirus-transfectedmice (data not shown). Similar overexpressionof <strong>VEGF</strong>-A was found <strong>in</strong> the lung, kidney, <strong>and</strong>liver, although no result<strong>in</strong>g pathologic features were observed<strong>in</strong> the transfected tissues (data not shown).


February 2009 THE PATHOGENIC ROLE OF <strong>VEGF</strong>-A IN IBD 591produced more TNF- (0.8 0.1 pg/g) <strong>and</strong> KC (45 3 pg/g) than control mice (0.4 0.03 pg/g <strong>and</strong> 20 2 pg/g, respectively, both P .05). Notably, mice <strong>in</strong>which <strong>VEGF</strong>-A was blocked produced significantly (both,P .05) less TNF- (0.2 0.04 pg/g) <strong>and</strong> KC (7 1pg/g).Manipulation of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A Expression In VivoAffects Both <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Inflammation</strong>In VivoF<strong>in</strong>ally, we <strong>in</strong>vestigated the effects of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A onangiogenesis <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>flammation dur<strong>in</strong>g thecourse of colitis. First, we measured the effects of overexpressionof <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong> s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 on <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al angiogenesisby <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the expression of CD31, anestablished marker of angiogenesis, <strong>and</strong> by quantify<strong>in</strong>gmicrovascular density. Mice that overexpressed <strong>VEGF</strong>-Ahad a significantly <strong>in</strong>creased (P .05) number of microvessels(112 8 vessel/field) compared with miceadm<strong>in</strong>istered the control adenovirus (79 12 vessel/field) or healthy control mice (38 3 vessel/field). Im-Figure 5. <strong>VEGF</strong>-A is up-regulated <strong>in</strong> mice with DSS-<strong>in</strong>duced colitis, asis its receptor <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2, but not <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1. (A) Mucosal extracts wereobta<strong>in</strong>ed from mice undergo<strong>in</strong>g DSS treatment, <strong>and</strong> their <strong>VEGF</strong>-A contentwas assessed by Western blott<strong>in</strong>g. (B) The panels show brownimmunohistochemical sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>and</strong> -2 <strong>in</strong> the microvasculatureof colonic mucosa <strong>and</strong> submucosa from histologically normalcontrol mice (A <strong>and</strong> C) <strong>and</strong> DSS-colitic mice (B <strong>and</strong> D). The panels arerepresentative of 6 control <strong>and</strong> 7 DSS colitic mice.The <strong>VEGF</strong>-A adenovirus construct was then used tooverexpress <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong> mice with DSS-<strong>in</strong>duced colitis todeterm<strong>in</strong>e the effects on colitis. In addition, the effect ofblock<strong>in</strong>g <strong>VEGF</strong>-A by adm<strong>in</strong>ister<strong>in</strong>g an adenovirus thatencodes the soluble receptor VEGR-1 (s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1) wasdeterm<strong>in</strong>ed (Figure 6). Compared with mice adm<strong>in</strong>isteredcontrol adenovirus, mice adm<strong>in</strong>istered the <strong>VEGF</strong>-Aadenovirus developed significantly more severe colitis(P .05), whereas mice adm<strong>in</strong>istered the s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 adenovirusdisplayed a significantly (P .05) less severecolitis, as assessed by weight loss (Figure 6A) <strong>and</strong> histologicscores (Figure 6B). In particular, there was 100%mortality <strong>in</strong> the <strong>VEGF</strong>-A adenovirus group by day 9,whereas only 20% of the mice that received the controladenovirus <strong>and</strong> none that received the s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 adenovirusdied (data not shown).Intest<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>flammation is associated with a local <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>in</strong> the production of cytok<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> chemok<strong>in</strong>es.To test whether the severe colitis we observed <strong>in</strong> the miceoverexpress<strong>in</strong>g <strong>VEGF</strong>-A mice was associated with an <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>in</strong> cytok<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> chemok<strong>in</strong>e production <strong>in</strong> the<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al mucosa, the levels of TNF-, the mouse homologof human <strong>in</strong>terleuk<strong>in</strong> (IL)-8 (KC) <strong>in</strong> the colonicmucosa were measured <strong>in</strong> an organ culture system. Aftercolitis was established, mice that overexpressed <strong>VEGF</strong>-AFigure 6. Overexpression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong>creases the severity of colitis <strong>in</strong>DSS treated mice, whereas <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 decreases the severity. (A) Miceundergo<strong>in</strong>g DSS treatment were <strong>in</strong>jected with adenoviruses encod<strong>in</strong>g<strong>VEGF</strong>-A (n 11), s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 (n 9), or a control virus (n 8) <strong>and</strong>monitored daily for weight loss. (B) After 8 days, mice were killed <strong>and</strong>their colons assessed for histologic colitis. *P .05 for mice overexpress<strong>in</strong>g<strong>VEGF</strong> (n 6) compared with control mice (n 6) <strong>and</strong> for miceoverexpress<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 (n 6) vs control mice.BASIC–ALIMENTARY TRACT


592 SCALDAFERRI ET AL GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 136, No. 2BASIC–ALIMENTARY TRACTFigure 7. Modulation of the <strong>VEGF</strong> pathway affects angiogenesis <strong>and</strong> leukocyte adhesion <strong>in</strong> mice with DSS-<strong>in</strong>duced colitis. Mice undergo<strong>in</strong>gDSS treatment were <strong>in</strong>jected with adenoviruses encod<strong>in</strong>g a control virus (A,n 8), <strong>VEGF</strong>-A (B,n 11), or s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 (C,n 9) <strong>and</strong> were killedafter 8 days of treatment. Their colons were immunosta<strong>in</strong>ed for CD31 <strong>and</strong> vascular density was measured. (D) Leukocyte-endothelial cell<strong>in</strong>teractions were assessed by <strong>in</strong>travital microscopy <strong>in</strong> 3 groups of animals: healthy mice (open bar; n 6), DSS colitic mice (shaded bar; n6), <strong>and</strong> DSS colitic mice, treated with daily <strong>in</strong>jections of <strong>VEGF</strong> (solid bar; n 6). Leukocyte adhesion is expressed as the number of firmlyadherent leukocytes to the endothelium per 100 m of venule. **P .001 between healthy <strong>and</strong> colitic mice; *P .05 between colitic/placebo<strong>and</strong> colitic/<strong>VEGF</strong> treated mice.portantly, mice adm<strong>in</strong>istered the adenovirus encod<strong>in</strong>gfor sVEGR-1 had a significantly decreased (P .05) numberof mucosal vessels (44 11 vessel/field) (Figure 7).Second, we <strong>in</strong>vestigated whether <strong>VEGF</strong>-A could triggerleukocyte adhesion to the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al endothelium <strong>in</strong> vivo,thus trigger<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>flammation. We quantifiedthe number of adher<strong>in</strong>g leukocytes <strong>in</strong> the colonicmicrocirculation by <strong>in</strong>travital microscopy, as previouslyreported. 45 In healthy mice, very few leukocytes adheredto colonic venules (Figure 7D). By contrast, a large numberof leukocytes adhered to the colonic microvascularendothelium <strong>in</strong> mice with DSS-<strong>in</strong>duced colitis (P .001).In addition, colitic mice that were also adm<strong>in</strong>istered 1g/g recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>VEGF</strong> had a further significant <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>in</strong> leukocyte adhesion to the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e (Figure 7D),an effect that was abrogated if recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>VEGF</strong> wasblocked by monoclonal antibodies (data not shown).Healthy mice treated with recomb<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>VEGF</strong> alone hadno significant <strong>in</strong>crease of leukocyte adhesion to the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>almicrovascular endothelium.F<strong>in</strong>ally, compared with the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al vascular permeabilityof healthy mice adm<strong>in</strong>istered the control adenovirus(06 0.2 mg/g), permeability was not significantly<strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> healthy mice given the adeno-<strong>VEGF</strong>-A virus(0.7 0.3 mg/g, not significant.). In addition, permeability<strong>in</strong>creased when colitis was established at day 7 comparedwith <strong>in</strong> healthy mice (5 0.5 mg/g, P .05).Notably, adeno-<strong>VEGF</strong>-A transfected colitic mice displayeda further abnormal <strong>and</strong> significant <strong>in</strong>crease (9.3 0.9 mg/g, P .05) compared with untransfected DSScolitic mice, whereas transfection with adeno-s<strong>VEGF</strong>R1attenuated the <strong>in</strong>crease to levels below those <strong>in</strong> un<strong>in</strong>fectedDSS colitic mice (2.6 0.3 mg/g), suggest<strong>in</strong>g that<strong>VEGF</strong>-A regulates permeability.


February 2009 THE PATHOGENIC ROLE OF <strong>VEGF</strong>-A IN IBD 593DiscussionIt has now been clearly established that the microvascularchanges associated with angiogenesis are key contributorsto the tissue <strong>in</strong>jury <strong>and</strong> remodel<strong>in</strong>g processthat <strong>in</strong>evitably accompanies chronic <strong>in</strong>flammation. 10,12,14,15However, the important role played by angiogenesis <strong>in</strong>several chronic <strong>in</strong>flammatory diseases is still be<strong>in</strong>g elucidated.15 We <strong>and</strong> others have shown that <strong>in</strong>tense angiogenesisoccurs <strong>in</strong> humans with IBD <strong>in</strong> animals withexperimental colitis. 33–35Increas<strong>in</strong>g evidence suggests that <strong>VEGF</strong>-A is one of themajor proangiogenic factors <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> pathologic angiogenesis.The expression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong> its receptors iselevated <strong>in</strong> patients with <strong>in</strong>flammatory sk<strong>in</strong> diseases thatare associated with enhanced vascularity such as psoriasis.55,56 Similarly <strong>in</strong> human <strong>and</strong> experimental rheumatoidarthritis, the <strong>VEGF</strong>-A pathway is strongly overexpressed<strong>and</strong> activated, <strong>and</strong> its blockade is cl<strong>in</strong>ically beneficial. 57In this study, we demonstrate activation of the <strong>VEGF</strong>pathway <strong>in</strong> the actively <strong>in</strong>flamed mucosa of patients withIBD. Expression of both <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong> its receptor<strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 are enhanced <strong>in</strong> tissue biopsy specimens from<strong>in</strong>flamed bowel segments. To test whether the pro<strong>in</strong>flammatorymilieu of the IBD mucosa can directly affect theexpression of <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>and</strong> -2 on the endothelium, we<strong>in</strong>vestigated whether TNF- or the receptor lig<strong>and</strong><strong>VEGF</strong>-A could enhance receptor expression levels. UnstimulatedHIMEC express both <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>and</strong> <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2,but only <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 was up-regulated <strong>in</strong> response to<strong>VEGF</strong>-A or the pro<strong>in</strong>flammatory cytok<strong>in</strong>e TNF-, suggest<strong>in</strong>gthat the overexpression observed <strong>in</strong> vivo <strong>in</strong> patientswith IBD may be due to a mucosal milieu rich <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>flammatory mediators. We next <strong>in</strong>vestigated whetherthe enhanced expression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A observed <strong>in</strong> patientswith IBD can affect the angiogenic activity of endothelialcells us<strong>in</strong>g microtubule formation <strong>and</strong> migration assays.When HIMEC were stimulated with <strong>VEGF</strong>-A, there wasrapid formation of microtubules, an effect <strong>in</strong>hibited byan anti-<strong>VEGF</strong> antibody, which completely <strong>in</strong>hibited microtubuleformation. In addition, mucosal extracts frompatients with IBD potently <strong>in</strong>duced migration ofHIMEC, which was aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>VEGF</strong>-A dependant becausemigration was reduced by the anti-<strong>VEGF</strong>-A antibody.Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, besides its classical angiogenic activities,we also found that <strong>VEGF</strong>-A can exert pro<strong>in</strong>flammatoryeffects on <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al endothelium, both <strong>in</strong> vitro <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>vivo. When the endothelium becomes <strong>in</strong>flamed, it expressesenhanced levels of cell adhesion molecules. Thiswas also true for HIMEC that had been stimulated with<strong>VEGF</strong>-A, which caused enhanced expression of ICAM-1.The functional consequences of expression of ICAM-1 byHIMEC were confirmed by the demonstration that theywere able to mediate neutrophil adhesion. Taken together,these data suggest that, besides act<strong>in</strong>g as an angiogenicmediator, <strong>VEGF</strong>-A is also an <strong>in</strong>flammatory moleculeact<strong>in</strong>g on mucosal endothelial cells dur<strong>in</strong>g thecourse of IBD.Next, we <strong>in</strong>vestigated the expression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong> itsreceptors <strong>in</strong> the DSS model of colitis. We found that theeffects on the <strong>VEGF</strong> pathway <strong>in</strong> this experimental modelof colitis mirrored that found <strong>in</strong> humans. <strong>VEGF</strong>-A, <strong>and</strong>its receptors <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>and</strong> <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2, were all expressedunder physiologic conditions. However, after the <strong>in</strong>ductionof colitis, the expression of both <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong><strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 were markedly enhanced, whereas no <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>in</strong> the expression of <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 was observed. These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<strong>in</strong>dicate that this model of colitis offers a goodplatform to manipulate the <strong>VEGF</strong> pathway <strong>and</strong> therebyaffect the course of colitis.Adenoviruses are frequently used for the <strong>in</strong> vivo overexpressionof prote<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> their safety for use <strong>in</strong> humansis well established. 46 Adenoviruses for overexpression of<strong>VEGF</strong>-A have previously been used to <strong>in</strong>vestigate <strong>VEGF</strong>-A<strong>in</strong> several mur<strong>in</strong>e models of chronic <strong>in</strong>flammation, suchas atherosclerosis, arthrithis, diabetes, sepsis, <strong>and</strong> vascular<strong>in</strong>flammation. 46–50 In such models, systemic overexpressionof <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong>duces generalized up-regulation of<strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 by endothelial cells <strong>in</strong> several organs. 23,58,59 Inaddition, we also used an adenovirus for overexpressionof a soluble form of <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 to block the activity of<strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong> vivo. Adenoviral transfer of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A overexpressesplasma concentration nearly to 6 ng/mL, a valuecomparable with the <strong>in</strong> vitro experiments we performed.In l<strong>in</strong>e with our observations that expression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-Ais enhanced <strong>in</strong> humans with IBD <strong>and</strong> mice with experimentalcolitis <strong>and</strong> that <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong>duces an <strong>in</strong>flammatoryphenotype <strong>in</strong> HIMEC, overexpression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong> the<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al mucosa of mice with DSS-<strong>in</strong>duced colitiscaused a significantly more severe disease, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creasedcolonic cytok<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> chemok<strong>in</strong>e production,with 100% mortality by day 9. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, blockadeof <strong>VEGF</strong>-A with s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 significantly amelioratedthe severity of disease <strong>and</strong> decreased mucosal productionof <strong>in</strong>flammatory cytok<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> elim<strong>in</strong>ated mortality.To address directly the changes that are occurr<strong>in</strong>gdur<strong>in</strong>g manipulation of the <strong>VEGF</strong> pathway, we <strong>in</strong>vestigatedangiogenic changes <strong>in</strong> these animals. The levels ofthe angiogenic marker CD31 were markedly <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>mice overexpress<strong>in</strong>g <strong>VEGF</strong>-A, whereas its blockade <strong>in</strong>hibitedangiogenesis. In addition, the <strong>in</strong>creased leukocyteadhesion observed by <strong>in</strong>travital microscopy dur<strong>in</strong>g overexpressionof <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong>dicates that the <strong>in</strong>creased severityof <strong>in</strong>flammation results from a direct effect on the<strong>in</strong>flammatory phenotype of the endothelial cells. F<strong>in</strong>ally,because <strong>VEGF</strong>-A is also a crucial gatekeeper of vascularpermeability, we measured its effect on the regulation of<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al microvascular permeability. Adeno-<strong>VEGF</strong>-Atreatedmice had an <strong>in</strong>crease of Evans blue leakage, bothunder normal <strong>and</strong> colitic conditions. This effect wasreduced by blockade of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>VEGF</strong>-Ais responsible for exacerbation of the tissue edema thatBASIC–ALIMENTARY TRACT


594 SCALDAFERRI ET AL GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 136, No. 2BASIC–ALIMENTARY TRACTaccompanies the colitis. However, <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong>ductionprovoked Evans blue leakage specifically <strong>in</strong> the gut <strong>and</strong>not <strong>in</strong> other tissues, lead<strong>in</strong>g to the premise that <strong>VEGF</strong>-Ais necessary, but not sufficient, for disease activity <strong>in</strong>experimental IBD.Even though the overexpression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong> experimentalcolitis might <strong>in</strong>duce levels that are high comparedwith those observed <strong>in</strong> humans with IBD, it provides avery useful tool to study the contribution of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A tothe pathogenesis of <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>flammation. In addition,comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g these data with the beneficial effects of blockadeof <strong>VEGF</strong>-A observed both <strong>in</strong> vitro <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> vivo, itcompell<strong>in</strong>gly supports the pro<strong>in</strong>flammatory role of<strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>flammation.In conclusion, our results identify <strong>VEGF</strong>-A as a molecule<strong>in</strong>timately <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> IBD pathogenesis <strong>and</strong> onethat acts at the crossroads between <strong>in</strong>flammatory-drivenangiogenesis <strong>and</strong> mucosal <strong>in</strong>flammation. This suggeststhat blockade of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A may represent a new strategy todampen <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>flammation.Supplementary DataNote: To access the supplementary materialaccompany<strong>in</strong>g this article, visit the onl<strong>in</strong>e version ofGastroenterology at www.gastrojournal.org, <strong>and</strong> at doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.064.References1. Danese S, Fiocchi C. Etiopathogenesis of <strong>in</strong>flammatory boweldiseases. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:4807–4812.2. Fiocchi C. Intest<strong>in</strong>al <strong>in</strong>flammation: a complex <strong>in</strong>terplay of immune<strong>and</strong> nonimmune cell <strong>in</strong>teractions. Am J Physiol 1997;273:G769–G775.3. Xavier RJ, Podolsky DK. Unravell<strong>in</strong>g the pathogenesis of <strong>in</strong>flammatorybowel disease. Nature 2007;448:427–434.4. Danese S. <strong>Inflammation</strong> <strong>and</strong> the mucosal microcirculation <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>flammatory bowel disease: the ebb <strong>and</strong> flow. Curr Op<strong>in</strong> Gastroenterol2007;23:384–389.5. Danese S, Dejana E, Fiocchi C. Immune regulation by microvascularendothelial cells: direct<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>nate <strong>and</strong> adaptive immunity,coagulation, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammation. J Immunol 2007;178:6017–6022.6. Carmeliet P. <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> <strong>in</strong> health <strong>and</strong> disease. Nat Med 2003;9:653–660.7. Carmeliet P. <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> <strong>in</strong> life, disease <strong>and</strong> medic<strong>in</strong>e. Nature2005;438:932–936.8. Folkman J. <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> <strong>in</strong> cancer, vascular, rheumatoid <strong>and</strong>other disease. Nat Med 1995;1:27–31.9. Gould VE, Wagner BM. <strong>Angiogenesis</strong>: an exp<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g universe.Hum Pathol 2002;33:1061–1063.10. Majno G. Chronic <strong>in</strong>flammation: l<strong>in</strong>ks with angiogenesis <strong>and</strong>wound heal<strong>in</strong>g. Am J Pathol 1998;153:1035–1039.11. Carmeliet P. Mechanisms of angiogenesis <strong>and</strong> arteriogenesis.Nat Med 2000;6:389–395.12. Bagli E, Xagorari A, Papetropoulos A, et al. <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>flammation. Autoimmun Rev 2004;3(Suppl 1):S26.13. Fireste<strong>in</strong> GS. Starv<strong>in</strong>g the synovium: angiogenesis <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammation<strong>in</strong> rheumatoid arthritis. J Cl<strong>in</strong> Invest 1999;103:3–4.14. Szekanecz Z, Koch AE. Vascular endothelium <strong>and</strong> immune responses:implications for <strong>in</strong>flammation <strong>and</strong> angiogenesis. Rheum Dis Cl<strong>in</strong>North Am 2004;30:97–114.15. Jackson JR, Seed MP, Kircher CH, et al. The codependence ofangiogenesis <strong>and</strong> chronic <strong>in</strong>flammation. FASEB J 1997;11:457–465.16. Benelli R, Lorusso G, Alb<strong>in</strong>i A, et al. Cytok<strong>in</strong>es <strong>and</strong> chemok<strong>in</strong>esas regulators of angiogenesis <strong>in</strong> health <strong>and</strong> disease. Curr PharmDes 2006;12:3101–3115.17. Dalgleish AG, O’Byrne K. <strong>Inflammation</strong> <strong>and</strong> cancer: the role of theimmune response <strong>and</strong> angiogenesis. Cancer Treat Res 2006;130:1–38.18. Ferrara N, Gerber HP, LeCouter J. The biology of <strong>VEGF</strong> <strong>and</strong> itsreceptors. Nat Med 2003;9:669–676.19. Tammela T, Enholm B, Alitalo K, et al. The biology of vascularendothelial growth factors. Cardiovasc Res 2005;65:550–563.20. Carmeliet P, Ferreira V, Breier G, et al. Abnormal blood vesseldevelopment <strong>and</strong> lethality <strong>in</strong> embryos lack<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>VEGF</strong>allele. Nature 1996;380:435–439.21. Carmeliet P, Collen D. Molecular analysis of blood vessel formation<strong>and</strong> disease. Am J Physiol 1997;273:H2091–H2104.22. Ferrara N, Mass RD, Campa C, et al. Target<strong>in</strong>g <strong>VEGF</strong>-A to treatcancer <strong>and</strong> age-related macular degeneration. Annu Rev Med2006;491–504.23. Ferrara N, Kerbel SR. <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> as a therapeutic target.Nature 2005;438:967–974.24. Takahashi H, Shibuya M. The vascular endothelial growth factor(<strong>VEGF</strong>)/<strong>VEGF</strong> receptor system <strong>and</strong> its role under physiological<strong>and</strong> pathological conditions. Cl<strong>in</strong> Sci (Lond) 2005;109:227–241.25. Dvorak HF, Detmar M, Claffey KP, et al. Vascular permeabilityfactor/vascular endothelial growth factor: an important mediatorof angiogenesis <strong>in</strong> malignancy <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammation. Int Arch AllergyImmunol 1995;107:233–235.26. Lee YC. The <strong>in</strong>volvement of <strong>VEGF</strong> <strong>in</strong> endothelial permeability: atarget for anti-<strong>in</strong>flammatory therapy. Curr Op<strong>in</strong> Investig Drugs2005;6:1124–1130.27. Roy H, Bhardwaj S, Yla-Herttuala S. Biology of vascular endothelialgrowth factors. FEBS letters 2006;580:2879–2887.28. Yamazaki Y, Morita T. Molecular <strong>and</strong> functional diversity of vascularendothelial growth factors. Mol Divers 2006;10:515–527.29. Creamer D, Sullivan D, Bicknell R, et al. <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> <strong>in</strong> psoriasis.<strong>Angiogenesis</strong> 2002;5:231–236.30. Walsh DA, Pearson CI. <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> <strong>in</strong> the pathogenesis of<strong>in</strong>flammatory jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>and</strong> lung diseases. Arthritis Res 2001;3:147–153.31. Brenchley PE. Antagonis<strong>in</strong>g angiogenesis <strong>in</strong> rheumatoid arthritis.Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60(Suppl 3):iii71–iii74.32. Kuldo JM, Ogawara KI, Werner N, et al. Molecular pathways ofendothelial cell activation for (targeted) pharmacological <strong>in</strong>terventionof chronic <strong>in</strong>flammatory diseases. Curr Vasc Pharmacol2005;3:11–39.33. Danese S, Sans M, De La Motte C, et al. <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> as a novelcomponent of <strong>in</strong>flammatory bowel disease pathogenesis. Gastroenterology2006;130:2060–2073.34. Danese S, Sans M, Spencer DM, et al. <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> blockade asa new therapeutic approach to experimental colitis. Gut 2007;56:855–862.35. Chidlow JH Jr, Langston W, Greer JJ, et al. Differential angiogenicregulation of experimental colitis. Am J Pathol 2006;169:2014–2030.36. Danese S, Scaldaferri F, Vetrano S, et al. Critical role of theCD40-CD40 lig<strong>and</strong> pathway <strong>in</strong> govern<strong>in</strong>g mucosal <strong>in</strong>flammationdrivenangiogenesis <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammatory bowel disease. Gut 2007;56:1248–1256.37. Koutroubakis IE, Tsiolakidou G, Karmiris K, et al. Role of angiogenesis<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2006;12:515–523.38. Goebel S, Huang M, Davis WC, et al. <strong>VEGF</strong>-A stimulation ofleukocyte adhesion to colonic microvascular endothelium: impli-


February 2009 THE PATHOGENIC ROLE OF <strong>VEGF</strong>-A IN IBD 595cations for <strong>in</strong>flammatory bowel disease. Am J PhysiolGastro<strong>in</strong>test Liver Physiol 2006;290:G648–G654.39. Danese S. <strong>VEGF</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammatory bowel disease: a master regulatorof mucosal immune-driven angiogenesis. Dig Liver Dis2008;40:680–683.40. Vogel JD, West GA, Danese S, et al. CD40-mediated immunenonimmunecell <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong>duce mucosal fibroblast chemok<strong>in</strong>eslead<strong>in</strong>g to T-cell transmigration. Gastroenterology 2004;126:63–80.41. B<strong>in</strong>ion DG, West GA, Ina K, et al. Enhanced leukocyte b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g by<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al microvascular endothelial cells <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammatory boweldisease. Gastroenterology 1997;112:1895–1907.42. Danese S, De La Motte C, Reyes BM, et al. Cutt<strong>in</strong>g edge: T cellstrigger CD40-dependent platelet activation <strong>and</strong> granular RANTESrelease: a novel pathway for immune response amplification.J Immunol 2004;172:2011–2015.43. Heidemann J, Ogawa H, Dw<strong>in</strong>ell MB, et al. Angiogenic effects of<strong>in</strong>terleuk<strong>in</strong> 8 (CXCL8) <strong>in</strong> human <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al microvascular endothelialcells are mediated by CXCR2. J Biol Chem 2003;278:8508–8515.44. Danese S, De La Motte C, Sturm A, et al. Platelets trigger aCD40-dependent <strong>in</strong>flammatory response <strong>in</strong> the microvasculatureof <strong>Inflammatory</strong> bowel disease patients. Gastroenterology 2003;124:1249–1264.45. Scaldaferri F, Sans M, Vetrano S, et al. Crucial role of the prote<strong>in</strong>C pathway <strong>in</strong> govern<strong>in</strong>g microvascular <strong>in</strong>flammation <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammatorybowel disease. J Cl<strong>in</strong> Invest 2007;117:1951–1960.46. Yla-Herttuala S, Alitalo K. Gene transfer as a tool to <strong>in</strong>ducetherapeutic vascular growth. Nat Med 2003;9:694–701.47. K<strong>in</strong>nunen K, Korpisalo P, Rissanen TT, et al. Overexpression of<strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong>duces neovascularization <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased vascular leakage<strong>in</strong> rabbit eye after <strong>in</strong>travitreal adenoviral gene transfer. ActaPhysiol (Oxf) 2006;187:447–457.48. Tarkka T, Sipola A, Jamsa T, et al. Adenoviral <strong>VEGF</strong>-A genetransfer <strong>in</strong>duces angiogenesis <strong>and</strong> promotes bone formation <strong>in</strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g osseous tissues. J Gene Med 2003;5:560–566.49. Yla-Herttuala S. An update on angiogenic gene therapy: vascularendothelial growth factor <strong>and</strong> other directions. Curr Op<strong>in</strong> Mol Ther2006;8:295–300.50. Leppanen P, Koota S, Kholova I, et al. Gene transfers of vascularendothelial growth factor-A, vascular endothelial growth factor-B,vascular endothelial growth factor-C, <strong>and</strong> vascular endothelialgrowth factor-D have no effects on atherosclerosis <strong>in</strong> hypercholesterolemiclow-density lipoprote<strong>in</strong>-receptor/apolipoprote<strong>in</strong> B48-deficient mice. Circulation 2005;112:1347–1352.51. Roy H, Bhardwaj S, Babu M, et al. Adenovirus-mediated genetransfer of placental growth factor to perivascular tissue <strong>in</strong>ducesangiogenesis via up-regulation of the expression of endogenousvascular endothelial growth factor-A. Hum Gene Ther2005;16:1422–1428.52. Lucerna M, Zernecke A, de Nooijer R, et al. Vascular endothelialgrowth factor-A <strong>in</strong>duces plaque expansion <strong>in</strong> ApoE knockout miceby promot<strong>in</strong>g de novo leukocyte recruitment. Blood 2007;109:122–129.53. Afuwape AO, Feldmann M, Paleolog EM. Adenoviral delivery ofsoluble <strong>VEGF</strong> receptor 1 (sFlt-1) abrogates disease activity <strong>in</strong>mur<strong>in</strong>e collagen-<strong>in</strong>duced arthritis. Gene Ther 2003;10:1950–1960.54. Kunstfeld R, Hirakawa S, Hong YK, et al. Induction of cutaneousdelayed-type hypersensitivity reactions <strong>in</strong> <strong>VEGF</strong>-A transgenic miceresults <strong>in</strong> chronic sk<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammation associated with persistentlymphatic hyperplasia. Blood 2004;104:1048–1057.55. Detmar M. Molecular regulation of angiogenesis <strong>in</strong> the sk<strong>in</strong>.J Invest Dermatol 1996;106:207–208.56. Zhang Y, Matsuo H, Morita E. Vascular endothelial growth factor121 is the predom<strong>in</strong>ant isoform <strong>in</strong> psoriatic scales. Exp Dermatol2005;14:758–764.57. Koch AE, Harlow LA, Ha<strong>in</strong>es GK, et al. Vascular endothelialgrowth factor. A cytok<strong>in</strong>e modulat<strong>in</strong>g endothelial function <strong>in</strong> rheumatoidarthritis. J Immunol 1994;152:4149–4156.58. Viita H, Markkanen J, Eriksson E, et al. 15-lipoxygenase-1 preventsvascular endothelial growth factor A- <strong>and</strong> placental growthfactor-<strong>in</strong>duced angiogenic effects <strong>in</strong> rabbit skeletal muscles viareduction <strong>in</strong> growth factor mRNA levels, NO bioactivity, <strong>and</strong> downregulationof <strong>VEGF</strong> receptor 2 expression. Circ Res 2008;102:177–184.59. Gampel A, Moss L, Jones MC, et al. <strong>VEGF</strong> regulates the mobilizationof <strong>VEGF</strong>R2/KDR from an <strong>in</strong>tracellular endothelial storagecompartment. Blood 2006;108:2624–2631.Received January 11, 2008. Accepted September 25, 2008.Address requests for repr<strong>in</strong>ts to: Silvio Danese, MD, PhD, Head, IBDResearch Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Istituto Cl<strong>in</strong>ico Humanitas-IRCCS<strong>in</strong> Gastroenterology, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan,Italy. e-mail: sdanese@hotmail.com; fax: (39) 02-82245101.The authors thank Dr R. Pola for provid<strong>in</strong>g protocols for LacZ sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g,C. Graziani for technical help, <strong>and</strong> Dr Sarah A. De La Rue ofReadable Science, United K<strong>in</strong>gdom, for her assistance with this manuscript.F.S. <strong>and</strong> S.V. contributed equally to the paper.The authors disclose the follow<strong>in</strong>g: Supported by grants from theBroad Medical Research Program, the “Premio SIGE UCB Post-DocAward,” grants from A.I.R.C. <strong>and</strong> from the Italian M<strong>in</strong>istry of Health(Ricerca F<strong>in</strong>alizzata 2006, n.72) (to S.D.), <strong>and</strong> a grant from M<strong>in</strong>isteriode Ciencia e Innovación (SAF 2008-03676) (to M.S.).BASIC–ALIMENTARY TRACT


595.e1 SCALDAFERRI ET AL GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 136, No. 2Supplementary Materials <strong>and</strong> MethodsIsolation <strong>and</strong> Culture of HIMECHIMEC were isolated as previously described. 1Briefly, HIMEC were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from surgical specimensof patients with CD <strong>and</strong> UC <strong>and</strong> from normal areas ofthe <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e of patients admitted for bowel resectionbecause of colon cancer, polyps, or diverticulosis.HIMEC were isolated by enzymatic digestion of <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>almucosal strips followed by gentle compression toextrude endothelial cell clumps, which adhere to fibronect<strong>in</strong>-coatedplates <strong>and</strong> were subsequently cultured<strong>in</strong> MCDB131 medium (Sigma, St. Louis, MO)supplemented with 20% fetal bov<strong>in</strong>e serum (FBS), antibiotics,hepar<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> endothelial cell growth factor.Cultures of HIMEC were ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed at 37°C <strong>in</strong> 5% CO 2 ,fed twice a week, <strong>and</strong> split at confluence. HIMEC were usedbetween passages 3 <strong>and</strong> 12.Tubule Formation <strong>and</strong> Migration AssayEndothelial cell tube formation was assessed us<strong>in</strong>gMatrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), as previouslydescribed. 2 Briefly, multiwell dishes were coated with 250L of complete medium conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 5 mg/mL Matrigel,<strong>and</strong> HIMEC were resuspended <strong>in</strong> complete growth mediumconta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g only <strong>VEGF</strong>-A or a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong> anti-<strong>VEGF</strong>-A (25 g/mL; both from R&DSystems, M<strong>in</strong>neapolis, MN) then were seeded at a densityof 5 10 4 . Cells were cultured on Matrigel for 16 hours,<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>verted phase-contrast microscopy was used to assessformation of endothelial tube-like structures. Fivehigh-power fields per condition were exam<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>and</strong> experimentswere performed <strong>in</strong> duplicate.Chemotaxis was assessed us<strong>in</strong>g previously reportedmethods. Briefly, fluorescence-blocked polycarbonate filters(8-m pore size; BD Bioscience, Frankl<strong>in</strong> Lakes, NJ)were coated with human fibronect<strong>in</strong> (10 m/mL) for 1hour at room temperature. Us<strong>in</strong>g a transwell system, 35 10 4 HIMEC were plated <strong>in</strong> the upper chamber <strong>in</strong>MCDB-131 medium, while the lower chamber conta<strong>in</strong>edchemotaxis buffer with grow<strong>in</strong>g concentration of <strong>VEGF</strong>(1–50 ng/mL) as positive controls or control or IBDderivedmucosal extracts. In some experiments, 25g/mL of block<strong>in</strong>g antibodies aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>VEGF</strong>, or controlantibody, were added to the chemotaxis buffer. After 4hours, buffer was removed from both chambers, <strong>and</strong>HIMEC migrated onto the lower surface of the porousmembrane were washed twice <strong>in</strong> phosphate-bufferedsal<strong>in</strong>e (PBS) <strong>and</strong> sta<strong>in</strong>ed with calce<strong>in</strong> for 15 m<strong>in</strong>utes at37°C. Duplicates of migrated cells were observed withan <strong>in</strong>verted fluorescence microscope <strong>and</strong> counted <strong>in</strong> 6r<strong>and</strong>om high-power (200) fields. Quantitative analysisof data was performed us<strong>in</strong>g the Image Pro Plussoftware (Media Cybernetics, Inc, Bethesda, MD).Intravital Microscopy Study of Leukocyte-Endothelium Interactions <strong>in</strong> the BowelMicrovasculatureMice were anesthetized with subcutaneous ketam<strong>in</strong>e(150 mg/kg) <strong>and</strong> xylaz<strong>in</strong>e (7.5 mg/kg), <strong>and</strong> a tailve<strong>in</strong> was cannulated. Throughout the experiments, rectaltemperature was monitored us<strong>in</strong>g an electrothermometer<strong>and</strong> was ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed between 36.5°C <strong>and</strong> 37.5°C with an<strong>in</strong>frared heat lamp. The abdomen was opened via a midl<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>cision, <strong>and</strong> a segment of the distal colon waschosen for microscopic exam<strong>in</strong>ation, exteriorized, <strong>and</strong>covered with a cotton gauze soaked with bicarbonatebuffer. Mice were then placed on an adjustable microscopestage, <strong>and</strong> the colon was extended over a nonautofluorescentcoverslip that allowed observation of a 2-cm 2segment of tissue. An <strong>in</strong>verted microscope (Diaphot 300;Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with a CF Fluor 403 objective lens(Nikon) was used. A charge-coupled device camera(model XC-77; Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan)with a C2400 charge-coupled device camera controlunit <strong>and</strong> a C2400-68 <strong>in</strong>tensifier head (Hamamatsu Photonics),mounted on the microscope, projected the imageonto a monitor (Tr<strong>in</strong>itron KX-14CP1; Sony, Tokyo, Japan),<strong>and</strong> the images were recorded us<strong>in</strong>g a videocassetterecorder (SR-S368E; JVC, Tokyo, Japan) for off-l<strong>in</strong>e analysis.Leukocytes were labeled <strong>in</strong> vivo by subcutaneous<strong>in</strong>jection of rhodam<strong>in</strong>e-6G (Molecular Probes, Leiden,The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s). Rhodam<strong>in</strong>e-6G-associated fluorescencewas visualized by epi-illum<strong>in</strong>ation at 510–560 nm,us<strong>in</strong>g a 590-nm emission filter. S<strong>in</strong>gle unbranched submucosal<strong>and</strong> lam<strong>in</strong>a propria venules with <strong>in</strong>ternal diametersof 25–40 mm were selected for observation. The fluxof roll<strong>in</strong>g leukocytes, leukocyte roll<strong>in</strong>g velocity, numberof adherent leukocytes, venular blood flow, <strong>and</strong> venularwall shear rate were determ<strong>in</strong>ed off-l<strong>in</strong>e after playback ofthe videotapes, as previously described. 3 Roll<strong>in</strong>g leukocyteswere def<strong>in</strong>ed as those white blood cells that movedat a velocity less than that of free-flow<strong>in</strong>g leukocytes <strong>in</strong>the same vessel. The flux of roll<strong>in</strong>g leukocytes was measuredas the number of roll<strong>in</strong>g leukocytes that passed afixed po<strong>in</strong>t with<strong>in</strong> a small (10 mm) view<strong>in</strong>g area of thevessel <strong>in</strong> a 1-m<strong>in</strong>ute period. Leukocytes were consideredadherent to venular endothelium when stationary for 30seconds or longer <strong>and</strong> expressed as the number per100-m length of venule. In each animal, 3 to 6 r<strong>and</strong>omvenules were exam<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>and</strong> results were calculated as themean of each parameter <strong>in</strong> all venules exam<strong>in</strong>ed.Western Blott<strong>in</strong>g AnalysisConfluent HIMEC monolayers were left unstimulatedor stimulated with <strong>VEGF</strong>-A (50 ng/mL) or TNF-(50 ng/mL) both from R&D Systems) for 48 hours <strong>in</strong>regular culture medium supplemented with 5% FBS. Thecells were lysed with extraction buffer conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 50mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/Lethylenediam<strong>in</strong>etetraacetic acid, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton


February 2009 THE PATHOGENIC ROLE OF <strong>VEGF</strong>-A IN IBD 595.e2X-100, <strong>and</strong> 50 mmol/L protease plus 50 mmol/L phosphatase<strong>in</strong>hibitor cocktail (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis,MO). The prote<strong>in</strong> concentration of lysates was measuredus<strong>in</strong>g the Bio-Rad prote<strong>in</strong> assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories,Hercules, CA). Immunoblott<strong>in</strong>g was performed as previouslydescribed. 4 Prote<strong>in</strong>s (20 g) were separated on a10% Tris-glyc<strong>in</strong>e gel <strong>and</strong> electrotransferred to a nitrocellulosemembrane (Novex, San Diego, CA). Nonspecificb<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g was blocked by <strong>in</strong>cubation with 5% milk <strong>in</strong> 0.1%Tween 20/tris-buffered sal<strong>in</strong>e (Fisher Scientific, HanoverPark, IL), followed by overnight <strong>in</strong>cubation at 4°C withthe primary antibody: either mouse anti-human<strong>VEGF</strong>-R1 or rabbit anti-human <strong>VEGF</strong>-R2, both diluted at1:200 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).Membranes were washed for 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes <strong>in</strong> 0.1% Tween20/tris-buffered sal<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> then <strong>in</strong>cubated for 1 hourwith the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugatedsecondary antibody, goat anti-mouse antibody, or goatanti-rabbit antibody (1:2000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).The membranes were <strong>in</strong>cubated with chemilum<strong>in</strong>escentsubstrate (Super Signal; Pierce, Rockford, IL) for 5 m<strong>in</strong>utes,after which they were exposed to film (Amersham,Arl<strong>in</strong>gton Heights, IL).Colonic samples from colitic mice were frozen <strong>in</strong> liquidnitrogen at the time of removal. Follow<strong>in</strong>g mechanicalhomogenization <strong>in</strong> liquid nitrogen, specimens were processed<strong>in</strong> a lys<strong>in</strong>g buffer for prote<strong>in</strong> extraction as describedabove. Samples were then sonicated (twice for 5seconds), <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>soluble material was removed by centrifugationfor 15 m<strong>in</strong>utes at 16,000g at 4°C. The concentrationof prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> each lysate was measured us<strong>in</strong>g theBio-Rad prote<strong>in</strong> assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Immunoblott<strong>in</strong>gwas performed as described above, us<strong>in</strong>g therabbit anti-mouse <strong>VEGF</strong>-A (R&D Systems).Migration AssayChemotaxis was assessed as previously reported, 5,6with some modifications. Briefly, fluorescence-blockedpolycarbonate filters (8-m pore size; BD Bioscience,Frankl<strong>in</strong> Lakes, NJ) were coated with human fibronect<strong>in</strong>(10 g/mL) for 1 hour at room temperature. By us<strong>in</strong>g atranswell system, HIMEC were plated <strong>in</strong> the upper chamber<strong>in</strong> MCDB-131 medium, whereas the lower chamberconta<strong>in</strong>ed chemotaxis buffer with <strong>VEGF</strong>-A (50 ng/mL) aspositive controls or control or IBD-derived mucosal extracts.In some wells, 25 g/mL of block<strong>in</strong>g antibodiesaga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>VEGF</strong>-A or control antibody were added to thechemotaxis buffer. After 4 hours, buffer was removedfrom both chambers, <strong>and</strong> the HIMEC that had migratedonto the lower surface of the porous membrane werewashed twice <strong>in</strong> PBS <strong>and</strong> sta<strong>in</strong>ed with calce<strong>in</strong> for 15m<strong>in</strong>utes at 37°C. Duplicates of migrated cells were observedwith an <strong>in</strong>verted fluorescence microscope <strong>and</strong>counted <strong>in</strong> 6 r<strong>and</strong>om high-power (200) fields. Quantitativeanalysis of data was performed us<strong>in</strong>g the Image ProPlus software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spr<strong>in</strong>g, MD).Mucosal extracts from control patients or from patientswith IBD were also applied, then the same experimentalconditions were used. Mucosal extracts were obta<strong>in</strong>ed asdescribed above.Induction of Colitis <strong>in</strong> MiceAnimal studies were approved by the EthicalCommittee of the Istituto Cl<strong>in</strong>ico Humanitas <strong>and</strong> HospitalCl<strong>in</strong>ic y Prov<strong>in</strong>cial, Barcelona, Spa<strong>in</strong>. Colitis was<strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> C57BL/6N mice by adm<strong>in</strong>istration of 2.5%DSS (molecular mass, 40 kilodaltons; MP Biomedicals,Clevel<strong>and</strong>, OH) <strong>in</strong> filter-purified (Millipore Corporate,Billerica, MA) dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water for 10 days. The severity ofcolitis was assessed on a daily measurement of weightloss. 3,7For each animal, histologic exam<strong>in</strong>ation was performedon 3 samples from the distal colon; samples werefixed <strong>in</strong> 10% formal<strong>in</strong> before sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with H&E. Allhistologic quantification was performed bl<strong>in</strong>ded us<strong>in</strong>g ascor<strong>in</strong>g system that has previously been described. 3,7Three <strong>in</strong>dependent parameters were measured: severity of<strong>in</strong>flammation (0–3: none, slight, moderate, severe), extentof <strong>in</strong>jury (0–3: none, mucosal, mucosal <strong>and</strong> submucosal,transmural), <strong>and</strong> crypt damage (0–4: none, basalone-third damaged, basal two-thirds damaged, only surfaceepithelium <strong>in</strong>tact, entire crypt <strong>and</strong> epithelium lost).The score of each parameter was multiplied by a factorreflect<strong>in</strong>g the percentage of tissue <strong>in</strong>volvement (1, 0%–25%; 2, 26%–50%; 3, 51%–75%; 4, 76%–100%), <strong>and</strong> allnumbers were summed. The maximum possible histologicscore was 40. Mice were killed every other day forassessment of the expression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>in</strong> mucosal extracts.In Vivo Overexpression of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong>s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 Us<strong>in</strong>g AdenovirusMice were <strong>in</strong>jected with the adenovirus (1 10 9plaque-form<strong>in</strong>g units) <strong>in</strong>to their tail ve<strong>in</strong> 2 days prior tothe adm<strong>in</strong>istration of DSS, at the follow<strong>in</strong>g doses: 250 gof the <strong>VEGF</strong>-A adenovirus, 250 g of the <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 adenovirus,<strong>and</strong> 250 g of the LacZ adenovirus. To testwhether the virus localizes <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e, healthy micewere <strong>in</strong>jected with adenovirus-LacZ or adenovirus-vector.After 8 days, mice were killed then the colon was fixed <strong>in</strong>4% paraformaldehyde for 3 hours at room temperature<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubated <strong>in</strong> X-gal solution overnight at 37°C. Thetarget tissue samples were then placed <strong>in</strong> PBS <strong>and</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>edunder a dissect<strong>in</strong>g microscope to detect lacZ-express<strong>in</strong>gcells macroscopically. In addition, histologic sectionswere countersta<strong>in</strong>ed with nuclear fast red under 40magnification, <strong>and</strong> X-gal-positive cells (blue-sta<strong>in</strong>ed cells)per sample were counted <strong>in</strong> a bl<strong>in</strong>ded manner. In someexperiments, the pathogenic effect of <strong>VEGF</strong> was tested bydaily adm<strong>in</strong>istration of <strong>in</strong>traperitoneal <strong>in</strong>jections of recomb<strong>in</strong>ant<strong>VEGF</strong>-A (1 g/g). Bulk quantities of <strong>VEGF</strong>


595.e3 SCALDAFERRI ET AL GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 136, No. 2are provided free of charge by the BRB Precl<strong>in</strong>ical Repositoryof the NCI (web.ncifcrf.gov/research/brb/precl<strong>in</strong>/).Enzyme-L<strong>in</strong>ked Immunosorbent AssayCirculat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>VEGF</strong>-A was measured <strong>in</strong> blood <strong>and</strong>mucosal biopsy extracts us<strong>in</strong>g an enzyme-l<strong>in</strong>ked immunosorbentassay (ELISA), accord<strong>in</strong>g to the manufacturer’s<strong>in</strong>structions (R&D Systems). To determ<strong>in</strong>e the circulat<strong>in</strong>glevels of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A, blood was collected from control<strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> patients with IBD <strong>and</strong> diluted 1:10 <strong>in</strong> theanticoagulant sodium citrate (0.13 mol/L). The concentrationof <strong>VEGF</strong>-A was then assessed <strong>and</strong> expressed aspg/mL. Mucosal <strong>VEGF</strong>-A was assessed <strong>in</strong> endoscopic biopsyspecimens collected from the actively <strong>in</strong>flamed mucosaof patients with UC <strong>and</strong> CD <strong>and</strong> from normal areasof the colons of control <strong>in</strong>dividuals undergo<strong>in</strong>g colonoscopyfor non-IBD- or <strong>in</strong>flammatory-related bowel diseases.Biopsy samples were homogenized <strong>and</strong> sonicatedon ice <strong>in</strong> extraction buffer (10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.4,150 mmol/L NaCl, 1% Triton X-100) supplemented witha cocktail of protease <strong>in</strong>hibitors. Samples were centrifugedat 900g for 15 m<strong>in</strong>utes, then the supernatants werecollected <strong>and</strong> stored at 80°C. The prote<strong>in</strong> concentrationwas measured us<strong>in</strong>g the Bio-Rad prote<strong>in</strong> assay as permanufacturer’s <strong>in</strong>structions (Bio-Rad Laboratories) 8 ,then the concentration of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A was expressed aspg/g of prote<strong>in</strong>.Measurement of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong> s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>in</strong> the plasmaof adenoviral transfected mice was performed by ELISA,accord<strong>in</strong>g to the manufacturer’s <strong>in</strong>structions (R&D Systems).For measurement of colonic cytok<strong>in</strong>es, colonsfrom all mice were excised, opened, <strong>and</strong> cut longitud<strong>in</strong>ally<strong>in</strong>to 3 parts. One part was washed <strong>in</strong> cold PBSsupplemented with penicill<strong>in</strong>, streptomyc<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> amphoterac<strong>in</strong>B (BioWhittaker, Cambrex, East Rutherford, NJ)<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubated <strong>in</strong> serum-free RPMI 1640 medium with0.1% FBS, penicill<strong>in</strong>, streptomyc<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> amphoterac<strong>in</strong> B,at 37°C <strong>in</strong> 5% CO 2 . After 24 hours, the supernatant wascollected, centrifuged, <strong>and</strong> stored at 20°C. Supernatantswere analyzed for TNF- <strong>and</strong> KC content <strong>in</strong> duplicateus<strong>in</strong>g commercially available ELISA kits, as previouslyreported (R&D Systems). 3Immunosta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of Mucosal Expression of<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>and</strong> -2 <strong>in</strong> Human <strong>and</strong> Mur<strong>in</strong>eColonic Tissues <strong>and</strong> CD31 <strong>in</strong> Mur<strong>in</strong>e ColonicTissuesImmunosta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g was performed as previously described.5 Briefly, paraff<strong>in</strong>-embedded <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al sections ofhistologically normal control <strong>and</strong> IBD-<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>and</strong> -un<strong>in</strong>volvedmucosa <strong>and</strong> of mice were cut <strong>in</strong>to 3-m slices,deparaff<strong>in</strong>ized then hydrated, blocked for endogenousperoxidase us<strong>in</strong>g 3% H 2 O 2 /H 2 O, then subjected to microwaveepitope enhancement us<strong>in</strong>g a Dako Target retrievalsolution (Dako, Carpenteria, CA). Incubation with a primaryantibody; mouse anti-human <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 or rabbitanti-human <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology);<strong>and</strong> rabbit anti-mouse <strong>VEGF</strong>-R1 (Abcam, Cambridge,MA), rabbit anti-mouse <strong>VEGF</strong>R-2 (Gene Tex, SanAntonio, TX), or anti-mouse CD31 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)was performed at a 1:50 dilution for 1 hour atroom temperature. Detection was achieved with a st<strong>and</strong>ardstreptavid<strong>in</strong>-biot<strong>in</strong> system (Vector Laboratories,Burligame, CA), <strong>and</strong> antigen localization was visualizedwith 3’,3-diam<strong>in</strong>obenzidene (Vector Laboratories). Mucosalvascularization was quantified as reported. 9 Sta<strong>in</strong>edcolonic sections were scanned at low power (40) todetect the most vascularized area, after which at least 5microphotographs at high magnification (200) weretaken.Quantification of <strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 <strong>and</strong> -2 expression was performedon immunosta<strong>in</strong>ed sections by a semiquantitativemethod (scores from 0 to 3), as previously described. 3For microvessel density analysis, counts were performedas previously reported. 7Analysis of HIMEC by Flow CytometryDetection of expression of ICAM-1 <strong>and</strong> VCAM-1on HIMEC was performed by flow cytometry as previouslydescribed. 10 Briefly, HIMEC were plated onto plastic<strong>in</strong> unsupplemented media for 48 hours then exposedto 50 ng/mL of <strong>VEGF</strong> or TNF-. After 24 hours, HIMECwere rapidly tryps<strong>in</strong>ized, washed twice, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubatedwith PE mouse anti-human ICAM-1 <strong>and</strong> phycoerythr<strong>in</strong>mouse anti-human (both from BD Pharm<strong>in</strong>gen, San Diego,CA) or isotype control antibody for 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes onice, washed aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>cubated with a mouse secondary-fluoresce<strong>in</strong>isothiocyanate conjugated antibody. Afteradditional wash<strong>in</strong>g, HIMEC were analyzed by quantitativeflow cytometry us<strong>in</strong>g a Coulter Epics XL Flow Cytometer(Beckman Coulter, Inc, Fullerton, CA). Eachanalysis was performed on at least 10,000 events. ICAM-1expression was quantified us<strong>in</strong>g the W<strong>in</strong>list software program(Verity Software House, Topsham, ME).HIMEC-Neutrophil Adhesion AssayAdhesion assays were performed as previously reported.3,10 Neutrophils were isolated from healthy controlsfrom peripheral blood <strong>and</strong> utilized for the adhesion assay. 1Confluent HIMEC monolayers were left alone or stimulatedwith 50 ng/mL TNF-. After 1 hour, 10 6 calce<strong>in</strong> (MolecularProbes, Eugene, OR)-labeled neutrophils were overlaid <strong>and</strong>allowed to adhere at 37°C <strong>in</strong> a 5% CO 2 <strong>in</strong>cubator. In someexperiments, HIMEC were pre<strong>in</strong>cubated for 2 hours at37°C with 5 g/mL of polyclonal anti-ICAM-1 neutraliz<strong>in</strong>gor control antibodies (R&D Systems). Follow<strong>in</strong>g 1 hour ofcoculture, nonadherent neutrophils cells were removed by 3sequential r<strong>in</strong>s<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> wash<strong>in</strong>g with cold PBS. Fluorescentadherent cells were quantified <strong>in</strong> 10 r<strong>and</strong>omly selected fieldsby an imag<strong>in</strong>g system (Image Pro Plus; Media Cybernetics,Silver Spr<strong>in</strong>g, MD) connected to an Optronics Color digitalcamera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) on an <strong>in</strong>verted fluores-


February 2009 THE PATHOGENIC ROLE OF <strong>VEGF</strong>-A IN IBD 595.e4cence microscope. All experiments were performed <strong>in</strong> duplicatewells <strong>and</strong> results expressed as adherent cells/mm 2 .Measurement of Intest<strong>in</strong>al MicrovascularPermeabilityFor quantification of <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al vascular permeability,we used Evans blue that b<strong>in</strong>ds to album<strong>in</strong>. Itsleakage reflects <strong>in</strong>creased vascular permeability of macromolecules.Adeno-<strong>VEGF</strong>-A- <strong>and</strong> adeno-s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1-treated mice, as well as control mice, were anesthetized,<strong>and</strong> Evans blue (0.4 mg/100 g <strong>in</strong> PBS) was <strong>in</strong>jected<strong>in</strong>travenously 15 m<strong>in</strong>utes before death. Colons werethen removed <strong>and</strong> r<strong>in</strong>sed, Evans blue was extractedfrom the tissue us<strong>in</strong>g chloroform <strong>and</strong> measured byspectroschometry at 520 nm, <strong>and</strong> results were expressedas milligrams dye/grams wet weight colon.Statistical AnalysisData were analyzed by Graphpad software (SanDiego, CA) <strong>and</strong> expressed as mean SEM. Student t testor analysis of variance followed by the appropriate posthoc test was used when appropriate. Statistical significancewas set at P .05.References1. B<strong>in</strong>ion DG, West GA, Ina K, et al. Enhanced leukocyte b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g by<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al microvascular endothelial cells <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammatory boweldisease. Gastroenterology 1997;112:1895–1907.2. Danese S, Scaldaferri F, Vetrano S, et al. Critical role of theCD40-CD40 lig<strong>and</strong> pathway <strong>in</strong> govern<strong>in</strong>g mucosal <strong>in</strong>flammationdrivenangiogenesis <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammatory bowel disease. Gut 2007;56:1248–1256.3. Danese S. <strong>VEGF</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammatory bowel disease: a master regulatorof mucosal immune-driven angiogenesis. Dig Liver Dis2008;40:680–683.4. Danese S, De La Motte C, Reyes BM, et al. Cutt<strong>in</strong>g edge: T cellstrigger CD40-dependent platelet activation <strong>and</strong> granular RANTESrelease: a novel pathway for immune response amplification.J Immunol 2004;172:2011–2015.5. Vogel JD, West GA, Danese S, et al. CD40-mediated immunenonimmunecell <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong>duce mucosal fibroblast chemok<strong>in</strong>eslead<strong>in</strong>g to T-cell transmigration. Gastroenterology 2004;126:63–80.6. Heidemann J, Ogawa H, Dw<strong>in</strong>ell MB, et al. Angiogenic effects of<strong>in</strong>terleuk<strong>in</strong> 8 (CXCL8) <strong>in</strong> human <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al microvascular endothelialcells are mediated by CXCR2. J Biol Chem 2003;278:8508–8515.7. Danese S, Sans M, Spencer DM, et al. <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> blockade asa new therapeutic approach to experimental colitis. Gut 2007;56:855–862.8. Goebel S, Huang M, Davis WC, et al. <strong>VEGF</strong>-A stimulation ofleukocyte adhesion to colonic microvascular endothelium: implicationsfor <strong>in</strong>flammatory bowel disease. Am J Physiol Gastro<strong>in</strong>testLiver Physiol 2006;290:G648–654.9. Danese S, Sans M, De La Motte C, et al. <strong>Angiogenesis</strong> as a novelcomponent of <strong>in</strong>flammatory bowel disease pathogenesis. Gastroenterology2006;130:2060–2073.10. Danese S, De La Motte C, Sturm A, et al. Platelets trigger aCD40-dependent <strong>in</strong>flammatory response <strong>in</strong> the microvasculatureof <strong>Inflammatory</strong> bowel disease patients. Gastroenterology2003;124:1249–1264.


595.e5 SCALDAFERRI ET AL GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 136, No. 2Supplementary Figure 1. Adenoviral transfection <strong>in</strong>duced susta<strong>in</strong>edplasmatic levels of <strong>VEGF</strong>-A <strong>and</strong> s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1. Mice were transfected withan adenovirus encod<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>VEGF</strong>-A, s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1, or a control adenovirus.Mice were killed every other day, <strong>and</strong> the plasmatic concentrationsof <strong>VEGF</strong>-A (A) <strong>and</strong> s<strong>VEGF</strong>R-1 (B) were measured by ELISA. Data representmean SEM (mice 3 per each time po<strong>in</strong>t).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!