13.07.2015 Views

CH8.Ewout Frankema.education.pdf

CH8.Ewout Frankema.education.pdf

CH8.Ewout Frankema.education.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the Dutch colonial government started to annex the mission schools that were unable tostay in business (Hartgerink, 1942).The Dutch thus embarked on a path towards a dual system of public <strong>education</strong>, in whichthe mission schools were tying up the loose ends and the Islamic schools were graduallyoutcompeted. 1 In this dual system European schools offered the standard Dutchcurriculum to children of European and Indo-European descent. These schools wereopen to the top layer of the Indonesian elites who closely cooperated with the Dutch.European schools prepared children for a career in the colonial administration andoffered access to higher <strong>education</strong> in the Netherlands. The public schools for thecommon people (Volksscholen) served as a basic and cheap alternative to Western<strong>education</strong> (Brugmans, 1938, pp. 302-317; Lelyveld, 1996), with the purpose to prepareIndonesians for a position in Indonesian society. As of 1907 the government launched acampaign to promote the development of village schools, the so-called desa schools,which became the major driver of enrolment rates between 1907 and 1940. Studentsenrolled in a program of three years primary <strong>education</strong> focusing on the elementaryprinciples of reading, writing and calculation in the vernacular. Possibilities to attain astandard vernacular curriculum of six years were gradually enlarged (Boone, 1996).In sum, the key similarity in the genesis of both colonial <strong>education</strong> systems was that itresponded to a growing call in European media and public opinion to ‘develop’ insteadof ‘exploit’ the overseas territories. And as we will see in the next section, it also clearlyresponded to a growing desire among the indigenous populations to acquire usefulknowledge, improve material living standards and explore new job opportunities. Thekey difference is twofold. First, contrary to the Belgians the Dutch were committed tosecular <strong>education</strong> forced by local conditions (Islam) and domestic political ideology(Schoolstrijd). Second, indigenous access to Western <strong>education</strong> in the Dutch East Indieswas very limited, but nevertheless slowly extended until independence. In the BelgianCongo the maintenance of racial segregation policies made it impossible for the childrenof the Congolese elites to engage in a full curriculum of modern primary, secondary andtertiary <strong>education</strong>.3. Comparing school enrolment rates, 1900-2000A comparison of school enrolment rates at the primary and post-primary levels providesdeeper insight in the effects of different <strong>education</strong>al policies on the expansion of<strong>education</strong>al access. Figure 1 shows the 20 th century evolution of gross primary schoolenrolment rates for the age group of 6-11 (the official school age in the postwar era inIndonesia and the Congo). The time-series for the Netherlands Indies are taken from vanLeeuwen (2007, pp. 264-6). These include the enrolment of Indonesians, Europeans(mainly Dutch) and other Asians (mainly Chinese), but exclude the children enrolled inthe unrecognized schools, which did not receive state subsidy. The bulk of theseunrecognized schools consisted of Islamic boarding schools (pesantren) and mosqueschools (madrasah). These schools offered classes in religious philosophy and spiritual1 In the first decade of the 20 th century the colonial government deliberately transferred part of its<strong>education</strong>al responsibility to the missions in some of the Outer Areas, such as the Moluccas, under thepromise of state subsidies (Hartgerink, 1942, pp. 141-149).5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!