13.07.2015 Views

Charge Transfer Luminescence of Yb3+

Charge Transfer Luminescence of Yb3+

Charge Transfer Luminescence of Yb3+

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

L. van Pieterson et al. / Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Luminescence</strong> 91 (2000) 177–193 189Table 8Position <strong>of</strong> the Eu 3+ and Yb 3+ charge transfer band and quenching temperature <strong>of</strong> the 5 D 0 ! 7 F J luminescence after excitation in thecharge transfer band resp. the quenching temperature <strong>of</strong> the Yb 3+ CT luminescenceEu 3+ CT excitation band (nm) Eu 3+ T q (K) Yb 3+ CT absorption band (nm) Yb 3+ T q (K)ScPO 4 205 760 a 195 225LuPO 4 215 850 a 210 250YPO 4 218 >850 210 290LaPO 4 251 400 228 510NaScO 2 225 650 208 225NaLaO 2 264 320 262 510LiScO 2 223 >850 206 180LiYO 2 247 600 214 125LiLaO 2 274 475 252 510Y 2 O 3 250 >850 227 130Y 2 O 2 S 334 725 310 140La 2 O 2 S 347 480 317 150YAG 237 >850 212 580LaAlO 3 306 500 244 510ScBO 3 218 420 } 510YBO 3 228 >850 216 510LaBO 3 275 350 } 510a The luminescence did not quench completely at high temperatures, but stayed at more than a quarter <strong>of</strong> the maximum intensity.for all host lattices described above. In Table 8, theposition <strong>of</strong> the Eu 3+ charge transfer band and thequenching temperature <strong>of</strong> the 5 D 0 ! 7 F J luminescencewhen excited in the Eu 3+ charge transferband, are given for all lattices. For some lattices, inTable 8 marked with a , the luminescence did notquench completely at high temperatures but stayedat more than a quarter <strong>of</strong> the maximum intensity,although the quenching curve <strong>of</strong> the Eu 3+luminescence had the usual S-shape.4. Discussion4.1. <strong>Charge</strong> transfer absorptionIf we compare the position <strong>of</strong> the Yb 3+ chargetransfer absorption bands in the lattices weinvestigated, we can identify three classes <strong>of</strong>compounds. In LiYF 4 :Yb 3+ charge transferabsorption takes place at very high energy(7.5 eV), in the oxidic lattices (phosphates,oxides and aluminates) at lower energies(5.5 eV) and in the oxysulfides, charge transferabsorption takes place at lowest energies (3 eV).Jrgensen [2] has given an expression to estimatethe position <strong>of</strong> charge transfer transitions, viz.s ¼½wðXÞwðMÞŠ 30 kK:Here s gives the position <strong>of</strong> the charge transferband in kK (1000 cm 1 ), wðXÞ the optical electronegativity<strong>of</strong> the anion and wðMÞ that <strong>of</strong> thecentral metal ion. Using wðFÞ ¼3:9 [19] andwðOÞ ¼3:2 [20], we can estimate the value <strong>of</strong> w(Yb)at 1.68, somewhat higher than the value given byJrgensen (1.6) [21]. For Eu 3+ w has been determinedto be about 1.75 [21]. The slightly lowervalue for Yb 3+ is in agreement with the observation<strong>of</strong> Jrgensen that w uncorr varies in the orderEu(III)>Yb (III)>Sm (III). When for S we usewðSÞ ¼2:8 [19], the calculated positions <strong>of</strong> thecharge transfer bands <strong>of</strong> the S 2 –RE 3+ , O 2 –RE 3+ and F –RE 3+ transitions are: s(Yb 3+ –S 2CT) ffi 33 000 cm 1 , s(Eu 3+ –S 2 CT) ffi30 000 cm 1 ,s(Yb 3+ –O 2 CT) ffi 45 000 cm 1 , s(Eu 3+ –O 2CT) ffi 42 000 cm 1 , s(Yb 3+ –F CT) ffi 66 000 cm 1and s(Eu 3+ –F CT) ffi 63 000 cm 1 . These calculatedvalues are in good agreement with theexperimental values. The shift <strong>of</strong> the CT band<strong>of</strong> about 3000 cm 1 to higher energies for Yb 3+in comparison to Eu 3+ is in agreement withthe average value in our observations, although

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!