13.07.2015 Views

Terms of Reference CPAP Moldova Evaluation - unfpa

Terms of Reference CPAP Moldova Evaluation - unfpa

Terms of Reference CPAP Moldova Evaluation - unfpa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Did the programme activities increase the capacity <strong>of</strong> local NGOs to develop and implementprogrammes on gender-based discrimination and violence prevention?• How have human rights and gender equality considerations been effectively mainstreamedthroughout Country Programme development and implementation? Has the programme designbeen appropriate for a sustainable mainstreaming <strong>of</strong> human rights and gender equalityconsiderations throughout its implementation?EfficiencyThe assessment <strong>of</strong> efficiency considers or examines how economically and optimally inputs <strong>of</strong> thetechnical assistance (financial, human, technical and material resources) have been used to produceoutputs. The assessment <strong>of</strong> efficiency attempts link outputs to resources expended and assesses whetherthis happened as economically and as feasible as possible and the extent to which the quantity and quality<strong>of</strong> the results justify the quantity and quality <strong>of</strong> the means used for achieving them and whether they wereachieved on time. In the implementation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>CPAP</strong>, assess how efficient the inputs and resources wereutilized to produce the results or outputs in respect <strong>of</strong> the following.Objectives:• Evaluate how economically or optimally financial, human and technical inputs have been used toproduce outputs<strong>Evaluation</strong> Questions:• How efficiently has result based management been applied in achieving country programmeresults?• Were inputs provided and outputs met on a timely basis?Impact• Assessment <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the project considers the longer term and ultimate results attributableto the <strong>CPAP</strong> interventions that were being implemented. It considers the positive and negativelong term effects, which may be economic, socio-cultural, institutional, technological andenvironmental or other effects. Thus in the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the interventions, the assessmentshould determine the positive and negative changes produced by the intervention directly orindirectly, intended or unintended. Assess the extent to which the assistance has made a realdifference to the beneficiaries.<strong>Evaluation</strong> Questions:Do the beneficiaries and other stakeholders affected by the programme perceived the effect <strong>of</strong> theprogramme interventions on themselves?What are the perceptions <strong>of</strong> the different stakeholders, especially the Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Moldova</strong>,implementing partners and other United Nations organizations about the overall impact <strong>of</strong>UNFPA program?5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!