13.07.2015 Views

Terms of Reference CPAP Moldova Evaluation - unfpa

Terms of Reference CPAP Moldova Evaluation - unfpa

Terms of Reference CPAP Moldova Evaluation - unfpa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9. DELIVERABLESA. Inception ReportWithin five (5) days <strong>of</strong> award <strong>of</strong> contract, the Team leader, based on consultations with the otherconsultant shall submit an electronic copy <strong>of</strong> a draft inception report to UNFPA CO. The inception reportprovides an opportunity for UNFPA CO and the Consultants to ensure that their interpretations <strong>of</strong> theTOR are mutually consistent. The CO will coordinate the internal review and approval <strong>of</strong> the inceptionreport before submitting the report to the UNFPA Country Director for review and feedback. Theinception report shall:• Explain the evaluators’ understanding <strong>of</strong> what is being evaluated and why;• Describe the strategy for ensuring the evaluations’ utility and applicability to the needs <strong>of</strong> UNFPAand those <strong>of</strong> key stakeholders;*• Review and strengthen the evaluation methodology, describing the plans to engage and involvestakeholders in the design (e.g., questions, objectives, methods, data-collection instruments), datacollection, data analysis, and development <strong>of</strong> recommendations;*• Explain how the evaluation questions will be addressed with respect to all evaluative criteriaindicated above by way <strong>of</strong> proposed methods, evaluation designs, sampling plans, proposed sources<strong>of</strong> data, and data-collection procedures;*• Note: Consultants/Evaluators are encouraged to suggest refinements to the TOR and to proposecreative or cost- or time-saving approaches to the evaluation and explain their anticipated value.• For each <strong>of</strong> the evaluative criteria, describe the measurable performance indicators or standards <strong>of</strong>performance that will be used to assess progress towards the attainment <strong>of</strong> results, includingoutcomes;*• Discuss (a) the limitations <strong>of</strong> the proposed methods and approaches, including sampling, with respectto the ability <strong>of</strong> the evaluation team to attribute results observed to UNFPA’s efforts especially in theabsence <strong>of</strong> a valid counterfactual and (b) what will be done to minimize the possible biases andeffects <strong>of</strong> these limitations;*• Explain the Consultants’/Evaluators’ procedures for ensuring quality control for all deliverables;• Explain the Consultants’/Evaluators’ procedures to ensure informed consent among all people to beinterviewed or surveyed and confidentiality and privacy during and after discussion <strong>of</strong> sensitive issueswith beneficiaries or members <strong>of</strong> the public;*• Indicate familiarity with and agreement to adhere to (a) the requirements <strong>of</strong> the Standards for<strong>Evaluation</strong> in the UN System, especially standards 4.1 through 4.18 and (b) UNFPA’s <strong>Evaluation</strong>Quality Standards, which will be provided to the evaluator; and,• Provide a proposed schedule <strong>of</strong> tasks, activities, evaluation methodologies and deliverables consistentwith this TOR.10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!