Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6a-0.8b54B and CD-1.2a32100.01 0.1 Period (s) 1 10b-1.6BCD-20.01 0.1 1 10Period (s)c20161284c00.01 0.1 1 10Period (s)σ0.70.60.50.40.30.20.1σBCD0.00.01 0.1 1 10Period(s)Figure 6. Regression coefficients for the Northridge Earthquake.
3.0a2.01.0BCDa0.0-1.0-2.0-3.00.01 0.1 1 10Period (s)0b-0.2-0.4b-0.6-0.8-1BCD-1.20.01 0.1 1 10Period (s)0.70.60.5σσ0.40.30.2BCD0.100.01 0.1 1 10Period(s)Figure 7. Regression coefficients for the Loma Prieta Earthquake. The coefficient "c" isequal to 1.0 for all periods.
Page 1 and 2:
Pacific Earthquake EngineeringResea
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACTSeismic site response and t
Page 5 and 6:
REFERENCES.........................
Page 7 and 8:
(a) it requires a relatively extens
Page 9 and 10:
guideline and are not essential to
Page 11 and 12: an input outcropping rock motion fo
Page 13 and 14: amplification at long periods assoc
Page 15: The ground motion database provided
Page 19 and 20: factors. The analysis of these site
Page 21 and 22: for close distances to the zone of
Page 23 and 24: As a basis for comparison, the eart
Page 25 and 26: Table 6 compares the standard devia
Page 27: In general, it appears that greater
Page 30 and 31: gives equal weight to each earthqua
Page 32 and 33: SUMMARYConclusionsThe strong ground
Page 34 and 35: defined at high acceleration levels
Page 36 and 37: REFERENCESAbrahamson, N. A. and Sil
Page 38 and 39: Fumal, T. E., Gibbs, J. F., and Rot
Page 40 and 41: Proceedings, CALTRANS First Annual
Page 42 and 43: TABLES
Page 44 and 45: Table 2. Sites located on the footw
Page 46 and 47: Table 3b. Regression coefficients a
Page 48 and 49: Table 5. Subdivision of sites class
Page 50 and 51: Table 7a. Spectral acceleration amp
Page 52 and 53: Table 8a. Spectral acceleration amp
Page 54 and 55: Table 9a. Short-period (F a ) and m
Page 56 and 57: Figure 1. Relationship between stru
Page 58 and 59: Spectral Amplification Ratio54321De
Page 60 and 61: B sitesB11C sitesC1C22827C3D1C1115D
Page 64 and 65: 1.21Spectral Acceleration (g's)0.80
Page 66 and 67: 1.415 kmSpectral Acceleration (g's)
Page 68 and 69: 10PGASpectral Acceleration (g)10.1S
Page 70 and 71: 1.5PGA1.5T = 0.3 s11Residual (in Ln
Page 72 and 73: 1.5PGA1.5T = 0.3 sResidual (in Ln s
Page 74 and 75: 1T = 1.0 s0.5Residual (in Ln scale)
Page 76 and 77: B sites1.901.70Factor1.501.301.100.
Page 78 and 79: B sites1.901.70Factor1.501.301.10PG
Page 84 and 85: 2.50F a2.30Amplification Factor2.10
Page 86 and 87: Table A-1. Ground motion stations s
Page 88 and 89: Table A-1. (Cont.)Station Name Agen
Page 96 and 97: Table A-1. (Cont.)D.e.a. - Duke et
Page 102 and 103: Table A-3. Site categories in the 1
Page 104 and 105: Notes for Table A-4.1. H = total (v
Page 106 and 107: CONTENTS OF APPENDIX BCDMG 24461- A
Page 108 and 109: USC 99 - Arcadia - 855 Arcadia Av.D
Page 110 and 111: USC 14 - Beverly Hills - 12520 Mulh
Page 112 and 113:
USC 57: Canyon country - W. Lost Ca
Page 114 and 115:
USC 34 - LA Fletcher Dr.Date: June
Page 116 and 117:
Leona Valley sites (1-6)CDMG 24305C
Page 118 and 119:
CDMG 14404 - Rancho Palos Verdes -
Page 120 and 121:
CDMG 14405 - Rolling Hills Estates
Page 122 and 123:
CDMG 24644 - Sandberg - Bald Mounta
Page 124 and 125:
USGS 5081Date: June 3, 1998Time: 2:
Page 126 and 127:
USC 51 - Malibu - St. Adams Episcop
Page 128 and 129:
Formula for Spectral Amplification
Page 130 and 131:
(Table C4) and the number of sites
Page 132 and 133:
Table C1. Coefficients for determin
Page 134 and 135:
Table C3. Weights used to combine s
Page 136 and 137:
Table C4b. Regression coefficients
Page 138:
PEER REPORTSPEER reports are availa
show all

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?