Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Fumal, T. E., Gibbs, J. F., and Roth, E. F. (1982). "In-Situ Measurements of SeismicVelocity at 22 Locations in the Los Angeles, California Region." USGS Open-File Report 82-833.Fumal, T. E., Gibbs, J. F., and Roth, E. F. (1984). "In-Situ Measurements of SeismicVelocity at 16 Locations in the Los Angeles, California Region," USGS Open-File Report 84-681.Geomatrix Consultants (1993). "Compilation of Geotechnical Data for Strong-MotionStations in the Western United States." Report to Lawrence Livermore NationalLaboratory, Project No. 2256.Gibbs, J. F., and Fumal, T. E. (1993). "Seismic Velocities and Geologic Logs fromBorehole Measurements at Seven Strong-Motion Stations that Recorded the LomaPrieta Earthquake, Part IV." USGS Open-File Report 94-552.Gibbs, J. F., Fumal, T. E., Powers, T. J. (1993). "Seismic Velocities and Geologic Logsfrom Borehole Measurements at Seven Strong-Motion Stations that Recorded theLoma Prieta Earthquake." USGS Open-File Report 93-376.Gibbs, J. F., Fumal, T. E. Powers, T. J. (1994). "Seismic Velocities and Geologic Logsfrom Borehole Measurements at Seven Strong-Motion Stations that Recorded theLoma Prieta Earthquake." USGS Open-File Report 94-222.Gibbs, J. F., Fumal, T. E., and Roth, E. F. (1980). "In-Situ Measurements of SeismicVelocity at 27 Locations in the Los Angeles, California Region," USGS Open-File Report 80-378.Gibbs, J. F., Fumal, T. E., Boore, D. M., and Joyner, W. B. (1992). "Seismic Velocitiesand Geologic Logs from Borehole Measurements at Seven Strong-MotionStations that Recorded the Loma Prieta Earthquake." USGS Open-File Report92-287.Gibbs, J. F., Tinsley, J. C., and Joyner, W. B. (1996). "Seismic Velocities and GeologicalConditions at Twelve Sites Subjected to Strong Ground Motion in the 1994Northridge, California, Earthquake," USGS Open-File Report 96-740.Idriss, I. M., (1991). "Procedures for Selecting Earthquake Ground Motions at RockSites. A Report to the National Institute of Standards and Technology,"University of California at Davis, September, revised March 1993.Idriss, I. M. and Sun, J. I. (1992). "User's Manual for SHAKE91, A computer Programfor Conducting Equivalent Linear Seismic Response Analyses of HorizontallyLayered Soil Deposits Program Modified based on the Original SHAKE ProgramPublished in December 1972 by Schnabel, Lysmer and Seed."33
Iwasaki, T., Tatsuoka, F., and Takagi, Y. (1976). "Dynamic Shear DeformationProperties of Sand for Wide Strain Range." Report of Civil Engineering Institute,No. 1085, Ministry of Construction, Tokyo, Japan.Meyer, P. (1970). Introductory Probability and Statistical Applications. Addison-WesleyPublishing Company, Menlo Park, California.PEER (1998). Workshop meeting of Task 3: Characterization of Site Response, JointPEER-PG&E Research group. Held in San Francisco, April.ROSRINE (1998). URL: http://rccg03.usc.edu/rosrine/. Resolution of Site ResponseIssues in the Northridge Earthquake.Sadigh, K., Chang, C. Y., Egan, J. A., Makdisi, F., and Youngs, R. R. (1997)."Attenuation Relationships for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Based on CaliforniaStrong Motion Data." Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 68(1), pp. 180-189.Sadigh, K., Chang, C-Y, Abrahamson, N. A., Chiou, S. J., and Power, M. (1993)."Specification of Long Period Motions: Updated Attenuation Relations for RockSite Conditions and Adjustment Factors for Near-Fault Effects." Proceedings,ATC 17-1, pp. 59-70.SAS Institute, Inc. (1995). JMP User's Guide, Version 3.1. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NorthCarolina.Seed, H. B., and Alonso, J. L. (1974). "Soil-Structure Interaction Effects in the CaracasEarthquake of 1967." Report No. 73-23, Earthquake Engineering Research Center,Engineering Department, University of California, Berkeley, California.Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1982). "Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction duringEarthquakes." In Engineering Monographs on Earthquake Criteria, StructuralDesign, and Strong Motion Records, V. 5., Earthquake Engineering ResearchInstitute.Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1970). "Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for DynamicResponse Analyses," Report No. EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering ResearchCenter, University of California, Berkeley, California.Seed, H. B., Romo, M. P., Sun, J. J., Lysmer, J. (1987). "Relationships Between SoilConditions and Earthquake Ground Motions in Mexico City in the Earthquake ofSeptember 19, 1985." Report No. UCB/EERC-87/15, Earthquake EngineeringResearch Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley,California.Seed, R. B., Dickenson, S. E., and Mok, C. M. (1991). "Seismic Response Analysis ofSoft and Deep Cohesive Sites: A Brief Summary of Recent Findings."34
Page 1 and 2: Pacific Earthquake EngineeringResea
Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACTSeismic site response and t
Page 5 and 6: REFERENCES.........................
Page 7 and 8: (a) it requires a relatively extens
Page 9 and 10: guideline and are not essential to
Page 11 and 12: an input outcropping rock motion fo
Page 13 and 14: amplification at long periods assoc
Page 15: The ground motion database provided
Page 19 and 20: factors. The analysis of these site
Page 21 and 22: for close distances to the zone of
Page 23 and 24: As a basis for comparison, the eart
Page 25 and 26: Table 6 compares the standard devia
Page 27: In general, it appears that greater
Page 30 and 31: gives equal weight to each earthqua
Page 32 and 33: SUMMARYConclusionsThe strong ground
Page 34 and 35: defined at high acceleration levels
Page 36 and 37: REFERENCESAbrahamson, N. A. and Sil
Page 40 and 41: Proceedings, CALTRANS First Annual
Page 42 and 43: TABLES
Page 44 and 45: Table 2. Sites located on the footw
Page 46 and 47: Table 3b. Regression coefficients a
Page 48 and 49: Table 5. Subdivision of sites class
Page 50 and 51: Table 7a. Spectral acceleration amp
Page 52 and 53: Table 8a. Spectral acceleration amp
Page 54 and 55: Table 9a. Short-period (F a ) and m
Page 56 and 57: Figure 1. Relationship between stru
Page 58 and 59: Spectral Amplification Ratio54321De
Page 60 and 61: B sitesB11C sitesC1C22827C3D1C1115D
Page 62 and 63: 6a-0.8b54B and CD-1.2a32100.01 0.1
Page 64 and 65: 1.21Spectral Acceleration (g's)0.80
Page 66 and 67: 1.415 kmSpectral Acceleration (g's)
Page 68 and 69: 10PGASpectral Acceleration (g)10.1S
Page 70 and 71: 1.5PGA1.5T = 0.3 s11Residual (in Ln
Page 72 and 73: 1.5PGA1.5T = 0.3 sResidual (in Ln s
Page 74 and 75: 1T = 1.0 s0.5Residual (in Ln scale)
Page 76 and 77: B sites1.901.70Factor1.501.301.100.
Page 78 and 79: B sites1.901.70Factor1.501.301.10PG
Page 84 and 85: 2.50F a2.30Amplification Factor2.10
Page 86 and 87: Table A-1. Ground motion stations s
Page 88 and 89:
Table A-1. (Cont.)Station Name Agen
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Table A-1. (Cont.)D.e.a. - Duke et
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Table A-3. Site categories in the 1
Page 104 and 105:
Notes for Table A-4.1. H = total (v
Page 106 and 107:
CONTENTS OF APPENDIX BCDMG 24461- A
Page 108 and 109:
USC 99 - Arcadia - 855 Arcadia Av.D
Page 110 and 111:
USC 14 - Beverly Hills - 12520 Mulh
Page 112 and 113:
USC 57: Canyon country - W. Lost Ca
Page 114 and 115:
USC 34 - LA Fletcher Dr.Date: June
Page 116 and 117:
Leona Valley sites (1-6)CDMG 24305C
Page 118 and 119:
CDMG 14404 - Rancho Palos Verdes -
Page 120 and 121:
CDMG 14405 - Rolling Hills Estates
Page 122 and 123:
CDMG 24644 - Sandberg - Bald Mounta
Page 124 and 125:
USGS 5081Date: June 3, 1998Time: 2:
Page 126 and 127:
USC 51 - Malibu - St. Adams Episcop
Page 128 and 129:
Formula for Spectral Amplification
Page 130 and 131:
(Table C4) and the number of sites
Page 132 and 133:
Table C1. Coefficients for determin
Page 134 and 135:
Table C3. Weights used to combine s
Page 136 and 137:
Table C4b. Regression coefficients
Page 138:
PEER REPORTSPEER reports are availa
show all

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?