Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

More documents

Recommendations

Info

REFERENCESAbrahamson, N. A. and Silva, W. J. (1997). "Empirical Response Spectral AttenuationRelationships for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes." Seismological Research Letters,Vol. 68(1), pp. 94-127.Abrahamson, N. A. and Somerville, P. G. (1996). "Effects of the Hanging Wall andFootwall on Ground Motions Recorded during the Northridge Earthquake."Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 86, No. 1B, pp. S93-S99.Boore, D. M., and Brown, L. T. (1998). "Comparing Shear-Wave Velocity Profiles fromInversion of Surface-Wave Phase Velocities with Downhole Measurements:Systematic Differences Between the CSX Method and Downhole Measurementsat Six USC Strong-Motion Sites." Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 69(3),pp. 222-229.Boore, D. M., Joyner, W. B., and Fumal, T. E. (1997). "Equations for EstimatingHorizontal Response Spectra and Peak Acceleration from Western NorthAmerican Earthquakes: A Summary of Recent Work." Seismological ResearchLetters, Vol. 68(1), pp. 128-153.Borcherdt, R. D. (1994). "Estimates of Site-Dependent Response Spectra for Design(Methodology and Justification)." Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 10(4), pp. 617-653.Campbell, K. W. (1997). "Empirical Near-Source Attenuation Relationships forHorizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak GroundVelocity, and Pseudo-Absolute Acceleration Response Spectra." SeismologicalResearch Letters, Vol. 68(1), pp. 154-179.CDMG. 1:250,000 Scale Local Geologic Map Series.Chang, S. W., Bray, J. D., and Seed, R. B. (1996). "Engineering Implications of GroundMotions from the Northridge Earthquake." Bulletin of the Seismological Societyof America, Vol. 86(1), Part B Suppl., pp. 270-288.Chang, W. S., and Bray, J. D. (1995). "Seismic Response of Deep, Stiff Soil Deposits inthe Oakland, California Area during the Loma Prieta Earthquake." Report No.UCB/GT/95-06. Geotechnical Engineering, Department of Civil andEnvironmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California.Chang, W. S., Bray, J. D., Gookin, W. B., and Riemer, M. F. (1997). "Seismic Responseof Deep Stiff Soil Deposits in the Los Angeles, California Area during the 1994Northridge Earthquake." Report No. UCB/GT 97/01, Geotechnical Engineering,31
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California,Berkeley, California.CSMIP (1992). "CSMIP Strong-Motion Records from the Landers, CaliforniaEarthquake of June 28, 1992." California Department of Conservation, Divisionof Mines and Geology, Office of Strong Motion Studies, Report OSMS 92-09.Dibblee, T.W. 1:24,000 Scale Geologic Maps. Dibblee Geological Foundation MapSeries.Dickenson, S. E. (1994). "Dynamic Response of Soft and Deep Cohesive Soils duringthe Loma Prieta Earthquake of October 17, 1989. " A dissertation submitted inpartial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy inCivil Engineering of the University of California at Berkeley.Dobry, R., Martin, G. M., Parra, E., and Bhattacharyya, A. (1994). "Development of Site-Dependent Ratios of Elastic Response Spectra (RRS) and Site Categories forBuilding Seismic Codes." Proceedings of the NCEER/SEAOC/BSSC Workshopon Site Response during Earthquakes and Seismic Code Provisions, University ofSouthern California, Los Angeles, November 18-20, edited by G. M. Martin.Dobry, R., Ramos, R., and Power, M. S. (1997). "Site Factors and Site Categories inSeismic Codes: A Perspective." In Proceedings of the FHWA/NCEER Workshopon the National Representation of Seismic Ground Motion for New and ExistingHighway Facilities, Technical Report NCEER-97-0010. Friedland, I. M., Power,M. S., and Mayes, R. L., Eds.Duke, C. M. and Leeds, D. J. (1962). "Site Characteristics of Southern California StrongMotion Earthquake Stations." Report No. UCLA-ENG 62-55.School ofEngineering and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles,California.Duke, C. M., Johnson, J. A., Kharraz, Y., Campbell, K. W., and Malpiede, N. A. (1971)."Subsurface Site Conditions and Geology in the San Fernando Earthquake Area."Report No. UCLA-ENG 72-06. School of Engineering and Applied Science,University of California, Los Angeles, California.Fumal, T. E. (1991). "A Compilation of the Geology and Measured and Estimated Shear-Wave Velocity Profiles at Strong-Motion Station that Recorded the Loma Prieta,California, Earthquake." USGS Open-File Report 91-311.Fumal, T. E., Gibbs, J. F., and Roth, E. F. (1981). "In-Situ Measurements of SeismicVelocity at 19 Locations in the Los Angeles, California Region." USGS Open-File Report 81-399.32
Page 1 and 2: Pacific Earthquake EngineeringResea
Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACTSeismic site response and t
Page 5 and 6: REFERENCES.........................
Page 7 and 8: (a) it requires a relatively extens
Page 9 and 10: guideline and are not essential to
Page 11 and 12: an input outcropping rock motion fo
Page 13 and 14: amplification at long periods assoc
Page 15: The ground motion database provided
Page 19 and 20: factors. The analysis of these site
Page 21 and 22: for close distances to the zone of
Page 23 and 24: As a basis for comparison, the eart
Page 25 and 26: Table 6 compares the standard devia
Page 27: In general, it appears that greater
Page 30 and 31: gives equal weight to each earthqua
Page 32 and 33: SUMMARYConclusionsThe strong ground
Page 34 and 35: defined at high acceleration levels
Page 38 and 39: Fumal, T. E., Gibbs, J. F., and Rot
Page 40 and 41: Proceedings, CALTRANS First Annual
Page 42 and 43: TABLES
Page 44 and 45: Table 2. Sites located on the footw
Page 46 and 47: Table 3b. Regression coefficients a
Page 48 and 49: Table 5. Subdivision of sites class
Page 50 and 51: Table 7a. Spectral acceleration amp
Page 52 and 53: Table 8a. Spectral acceleration amp
Page 54 and 55: Table 9a. Short-period (F a ) and m
Page 56 and 57: Figure 1. Relationship between stru
Page 58 and 59: Spectral Amplification Ratio54321De
Page 60 and 61: B sitesB11C sitesC1C22827C3D1C1115D
Page 62 and 63: 6a-0.8b54B and CD-1.2a32100.01 0.1
Page 64 and 65: 1.21Spectral Acceleration (g's)0.80
Page 66 and 67: 1.415 kmSpectral Acceleration (g's)
Page 68 and 69: 10PGASpectral Acceleration (g)10.1S
Page 70 and 71: 1.5PGA1.5T = 0.3 s11Residual (in Ln
Page 72 and 73: 1.5PGA1.5T = 0.3 sResidual (in Ln s
Page 74 and 75: 1T = 1.0 s0.5Residual (in Ln scale)
Page 76 and 77: B sites1.901.70Factor1.501.301.100.
Page 78 and 79: B sites1.901.70Factor1.501.301.10PG
Page 84 and 85: 2.50F a2.30Amplification Factor2.10
Page 86 and 87:
Table A-1. Ground motion stations s
Page 88 and 89:
Table A-1. (Cont.)Station Name Agen
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Table A-1. (Cont.)D.e.a. - Duke et
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Table A-3. Site categories in the 1
Page 104 and 105:
Notes for Table A-4.1. H = total (v
Page 106 and 107:
CONTENTS OF APPENDIX BCDMG 24461- A
Page 108 and 109:
USC 99 - Arcadia - 855 Arcadia Av.D
Page 110 and 111:
USC 14 - Beverly Hills - 12520 Mulh
Page 112 and 113:
USC 57: Canyon country - W. Lost Ca
Page 114 and 115:
USC 34 - LA Fletcher Dr.Date: June
Page 116 and 117:
Leona Valley sites (1-6)CDMG 24305C
Page 118 and 119:
CDMG 14404 - Rancho Palos Verdes -
Page 120 and 121:
CDMG 14405 - Rolling Hills Estates
Page 122 and 123:
CDMG 24644 - Sandberg - Bald Mounta
Page 124 and 125:
USGS 5081Date: June 3, 1998Time: 2:
Page 126 and 127:
USC 51 - Malibu - St. Adams Episcop
Page 128 and 129:
Formula for Spectral Amplification
Page 130 and 131:
(Table C4) and the number of sites
Page 132 and 133:
Table C1. Coefficients for determin
Page 134 and 135:
Table C3. Weights used to combine s
Page 136 and 137:
Table C4b. Regression coefficients
Page 138:
PEER REPORTSPEER reports are availa
show all

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?