- Page 1 and 2:
Pacific Earthquake EngineeringResea
- Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACTSeismic site response and t
- Page 5 and 6:
REFERENCES.........................
- Page 7 and 8:
(a) it requires a relatively extens
- Page 9 and 10:
guideline and are not essential to
- Page 11 and 12:
an input outcropping rock motion fo
- Page 13 and 14:
amplification at long periods assoc
- Page 15:
The ground motion database provided
- Page 19 and 20:
factors. The analysis of these site
- Page 21 and 22:
for close distances to the zone of
- Page 23 and 24:
As a basis for comparison, the eart
- Page 25 and 26:
Table 6 compares the standard devia
- Page 27:
In general, it appears that greater
- Page 30 and 31:
gives equal weight to each earthqua
- Page 32 and 33:
SUMMARYConclusionsThe strong ground
- Page 34 and 35:
defined at high acceleration levels
- Page 36 and 37:
REFERENCESAbrahamson, N. A. and Sil
- Page 38 and 39:
Fumal, T. E., Gibbs, J. F., and Rot
- Page 40 and 41:
Proceedings, CALTRANS First Annual
- Page 42 and 43:
TABLES
- Page 44 and 45:
Table 2. Sites located on the footw
- Page 46 and 47:
Table 3b. Regression coefficients a
- Page 48 and 49:
Table 5. Subdivision of sites class
- Page 50 and 51:
Table 7a. Spectral acceleration amp
- Page 52 and 53:
Table 8a. Spectral acceleration amp
- Page 54 and 55:
Table 9a. Short-period (F a ) and m
- Page 56 and 57:
Figure 1. Relationship between stru
- Page 58 and 59:
Spectral Amplification Ratio54321De
- Page 60 and 61:
B sitesB11C sitesC1C22827C3D1C1115D
- Page 62 and 63: 6a-0.8b54B and CD-1.2a32100.01 0.1
- Page 64 and 65: 1.21Spectral Acceleration (g's)0.80
- Page 66 and 67: 1.415 kmSpectral Acceleration (g's)
- Page 68 and 69: 10PGASpectral Acceleration (g)10.1S
- Page 70 and 71: 1.5PGA1.5T = 0.3 s11Residual (in Ln
- Page 72 and 73: 1.5PGA1.5T = 0.3 sResidual (in Ln s
- Page 74 and 75: 1T = 1.0 s0.5Residual (in Ln scale)
- Page 76 and 77: B sites1.901.70Factor1.501.301.100.
- Page 78 and 79: B sites1.901.70Factor1.501.301.10PG
- Page 80 and 81: B sites1.901.70Factor1.501.301.10PG
- Page 82 and 83: B sites1.901.70Factor1.501.301.10PG
- Page 84 and 85: 2.50F a2.30Amplification Factor2.10
- Page 86 and 87: Table A-1. Ground motion stations s
- Page 88 and 89: Table A-1. (Cont.)Station Name Agen
- Page 90 and 91: Table A-1. (Cont.)Station Name Agen
- Page 92 and 93: Table A-1. (Cont.)Station Name Agen
- Page 94 and 95: Table A-1. (Cont.)Station Name Agen
- Page 96 and 97: Table A-1. (Cont.)D.e.a. - Duke et
- Page 98 and 99: Table A-2. (Cont.)Station Name Agen
- Page 100 and 101: Table A-2. (Cont.)Station Name Agen
- Page 102 and 103: Table A-3. Site categories in the 1
- Page 104 and 105: Notes for Table A-4.1. H = total (v
- Page 106 and 107: CONTENTS OF APPENDIX BCDMG 24461- A
- Page 108 and 109: USC 99 - Arcadia - 855 Arcadia Av.D
- Page 110 and 111: USC 14 - Beverly Hills - 12520 Mulh
- Page 114 and 115: USC 34 - LA Fletcher Dr.Date: June
- Page 116 and 117: Leona Valley sites (1-6)CDMG 24305C
- Page 118 and 119: CDMG 14404 - Rancho Palos Verdes -
- Page 120 and 121: CDMG 14405 - Rolling Hills Estates
- Page 122 and 123: CDMG 24644 - Sandberg - Bald Mounta
- Page 124 and 125: USGS 5081Date: June 3, 1998Time: 2:
- Page 126 and 127: USC 51 - Malibu - St. Adams Episcop
- Page 128 and 129: Formula for Spectral Amplification
- Page 130 and 131: (Table C4) and the number of sites
- Page 132 and 133: Table C1. Coefficients for determin
- Page 134 and 135: Table C3. Weights used to combine s
- Page 136 and 137: Table C4b. Regression coefficients
- Page 138: PEER REPORTSPEER reports are availa