13.07.2015 Views

The Dispensational View of the Davidic Kingdom - The Master's ...

The Dispensational View of the Davidic Kingdom - The Master's ...

The Dispensational View of the Davidic Kingdom - The Master's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

222 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Master's</strong> Seminary Journalcomes again it is as King (Rev. 19:16; cf. Luke 1:32-33). 33He fur<strong>the</strong>r emphasized <strong>the</strong> literal and earthly fulfillment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>Davidic</strong> Covenant:<strong>The</strong> Covenant is <strong>of</strong> an earthly throne related to a people whoseexpectation is earthly. <strong>The</strong>re is no evidence that David foresaw anearthly throne merging into a spiritual reign; yet David was givena perfect understanding concerning <strong>the</strong> divine purpose which <strong>the</strong>covenant designated. Nor is this kingdom and throne establishedin heaven. It is established on earth when <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>of</strong> Davidreturns to <strong>the</strong> earth (Matt. 25:31, 32. Cf. 19:28; Acts 15:16; Luke1:31-33; Matt. 2:2). 34In addition, Chafer dealt at length with <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>mes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fer,rejection and postponement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kingdom and discussed <strong>the</strong> churchand its relation to <strong>the</strong> kingdom: "<strong>The</strong> new purpose <strong>of</strong> God in this ageis seen to be <strong>the</strong> out-calling <strong>of</strong> a heavenly people. <strong>The</strong>y form a part <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> kingdom in its present mystery form (Mt. xiii.); but are in no wayrelated to <strong>the</strong> Messianic earthly kingdom <strong>of</strong> Israel. . . ." 35<strong>The</strong> agreement <strong>of</strong> Chafer and Sc<strong>of</strong>ield with Darby is clear.Blaising acknowledged agreement between Chafer and Sc<strong>of</strong>ield:"Chafer's view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kingdom was essentially <strong>the</strong> same as Sc<strong>of</strong>ield's." 36<strong>The</strong> view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kingdom was shared by many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir lesser knowncontemporaries as well. 37<strong>Dispensational</strong>ists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> last half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> twentieth century show33Chafer, Systematic <strong>The</strong>ology 7:223.34L. S. Chafer, "<strong>Dispensational</strong>ism," Biblio<strong>the</strong>ca Sacra 93 (October-December1936):435.35L. S. Chafer, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> in History and Prophecy (Philadelphia: Sunday SchoolTimes, 1919) 71.36Craig Blaising, "Lewis Sperry Chafer," Handbook <strong>of</strong> Evangelical <strong>The</strong>ologians, WalterElwell, ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1993) 91.37<strong>The</strong> works <strong>of</strong> W. Pettingill, J. M. Gray, W. E. Blackstone, J. H. Brookes, A. C.Gaebelein, D. G. Barnhouse, and H. A. Ironside contain similar views.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!