Draft Environmental Impact Report - East Bay Municipal Utility District

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Estates Reservoir Replacement Draft Environmental Impact ReportTraffic and CirculationTABLE 3.6-6Montclair Pumping Plant UpgradeConstruction Schedule and Trip Generation Estimates(Includes trips to and from the site)DurationDaily TripsHourly 1 TripsConstruction Phase(weeks) Trucks 2 Workers 3 Trucks 2 Workers 3Mobilization 1 1 2 1 1Retrofit Motors & ElectricalInstall new MCC, Switchgear, ControlPanel4 2 2 1 1Retrofit Motors & ElectricalRemove Pump & Motor #1 1 2 3 1 1Modify and Adapt Pump Mount #1 1 2 3 1 1Install New Pump & Motor #1 & Test 2 3 4 1 2Remove Pump & Motor #2 1 2 3 1 1Modify and Adapt Pump Mount #2 1 2 3 1 1Install New Pump & Motor #2 & Test 2 3 4 1 2Remove Pump & Motor #3 1 2 3 1 1Modify and Adapt Pump Mount #3 1 2 3 1 1Install New Pump & Motor #3 & Test 2 3 4 1 2Final Testing & Acceptance 1 2 2 1 1Demobilization 2 1 2 1 1Source: EBMUD, Fehr & PeersNotes: 1. Hourly trips refer to the number of trips expected to occur during the morning and evening peak hours.2. Hourly truck trip estimates assume truck trips occur equally across a 7-hour workday, and rounded up toethe nearest trip3. Hourly worker trip estimates assume one-third of daily workers arrive during the peak hour.Trip DistributionThe Project would generate two types of trips - construction worker trips and truck trips.This section describes the distribution pattern of each.Construction Worker Trip DistributionIt is expected that approximately 80 percent of site worker trips would generally accessthe site from SR 13, with 10 percent of trips from Moraga Avenue west and 10 percentfrom Park Boulevard west. Of the trips to/from SR 13, about one-third are expected fromthe north while the remaining two-thirds are expected from the south, as depicted onFigure 3.6-4. Worker trips from SR 13 to the north would access the Project site via theMoraga Avenue Interchange, and travel on Estates Drive to the Project site. Half of tripsfrom SR 13 to the south were also assumed to access the Project site via the MoragaAvenue Interchange, with the other half using the Park Boulevard interchange. Thoseusing the Park Boulevard interchange would travel on La Salle Avenue and Estates Driveto the Project site. Trips from Park Avenue, west of the study area, would probably filterthrough the neighborhood on Estates Drive from south of the site. While constructionworkers would be encouraged to remain on the main travel routes, some may deviate andtravel on minor residential streets, such as Dawes Street, as these streets provide a moredirect route to the site.sb09_001.doc 3-6.13 7/22/2009
Estates Reservoir Replacement Draft Environmental Impact ReportTraffic and CirculationSource: Fehr & Peers 2009Project Trip DistributionFigure 3.6-4Truck Trip DistributionRoutes to/from the site and the regional roadway network were reviewed in the developmentof a preliminary truck routing plan. Factors considered included the narrow width of Estatessb09_001.doc 3-6.14 7/22/2009
Page 1:
Estates Reservoir ReplacementDraft
Page 4 and 5:
TABLE OF CONTENTSEstates Reservoir
Page 6 and 7:
Estates Reservoir Replacement Draft
Page 8 and 9:
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONSABABAGAPC
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
SUMMARYS.1 IntroductionThis Draft E
Page 14 and 15:
Estates Reservoir Improvements Draf
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Chapter 2Project Description2.1 Ove
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Chapter 3Environmental Setting, Imp
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89: Estates Reservoir Replacement Draft
Page 100 and 101: 3.5 Cultural Resources3.5.1 Approac
Page 126 and 127: 3.6 Traffic and Circulation3.6.1 Ap
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
CHAPTER 5Cumulative Impacts, Growth
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
CHAPTER 6Report Preparers6.1 Lead A
Page 232 and 233:
APPENDIX APublic InvolvementPublic
Page 234:
APPENDIX BNotice of PreparationAUGU
Page 238 and 239:
Dingee Pressure Zone Improvement Pr
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
FIGURESDingee Pressure Zone Improve
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280:
show all

Draft Environmental Impact Report - East Bay Municipal Utility District

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?