Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway

Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway

conservationgateway.org
from conservationgateway.org More from this publisher
13.07.2015 Views

occurring in all EDUs and 28-32 of the 33 watersheds include common shiner, longnose dace,tessellated darter, banded killifish, redbreast sunfish, American eel, blacknose dace, and fallfish.These fish are associated with the widespread and common aquatic habitats of the region andappear to tolerate the ranges of climate and stream temperature that normally occurs across theregion. Although all these fish occur throughout the analysis area, some species such as whitesuckers, yellow perch, golden shines, and common shiners appear to be aquatic habitatgeneralists. They use a wide range of local habitats from creeks to small and medium rivers tolarge lakes and have ranges that extend significantly outside the region (Page and Burr 2001).Other species such as brown bullhead, brook trout, dace, fallfish, and tessellated darter preferspecific habitats that although specific, are widespread throughout the analysis region. Forexample, Brown bullheads need the deep water of large lakes and rivers, that occur in everyEDU (Williams 2002). Brook trout need cool, oxygen-rich creeks to medium rivers that are alsocommon habitats throughout the region. Blacknose dace, fallfish, and longnose dace prefer fastercurrent streams with gravel to rocky substrate. Blacknose and longnose dace prefer springs andcool, clear creeks with moderate to swift currents over gravel or rocks, with longnose dacepreferring slightly faster currents. Fallfish avoid small streams but prefer gravel, rubble bottomedpools and runs of small to medium rivers and lake margins. Certain widely distributed fish in thisregion such as banded killifish and tessellated darter prefer slower current waters that are alsocommonly found in this region. American eels are fish with a unique catadromous life historythat are widely distributed throughout the region. Non-native fish that occur in the regionincluded the bluntnose minnow, brown trout, cutlips minnow, fathead minnow, largemouth bass,pearl dace, pumpkinseed, rainbow trout, rock bass, round-whitefish, and trout-perch. Lake trout,rainbow smelt, and burbot were native in some of the watersheds and non-native in others.The increased numbers of species present in the Lower Connecticut EDU and Saco-Merrimack-Charles EDU in comparison to the Middle Connecticut, Upper Connecticut, and Cape EDUlikely represents the increased diversity of aquatic habitat niches within these EDUs, particularlytheir direct connection with the ocean. The Lower Connecticut and Saco-Merrimack-CharlesEDU have both diverse upland areas of habitat as well as significant sections of large, medium,and small coastal rivers where estuarine habitat is abundant and where there are access points foranadromous and catadromous species. The Cape Cod EDU has direct connection with the oceanand estuarine habitat; however, the sizes of rivers in the Cape Cod EDU are quite small; there areno size 3 rivers and only 5 examples of size 2 rivers. The Cape Cod EDU is also quite uniform inits physical habitat diversity that may also limit the number of species that can find adequatehabitat in this EDU. The dominance of higher gradient stream systems, higher elevations andcolder temperatures, and the lack of estuarine habitat limits the aquatic habitat niches available inthe Middle and Upper Connecticut EDUs. Certain species likely experience physiological limitsto the colder climate in these EDUs which may explain the lower number of species in theseEDUs.REVISED 6/2003AQUA-RESULTS-7

merrlowctcapeupctmidct3E-03100Native Fish and G1-3 Mussels by EDUDistance (Objective Function)4.4E-028.6E-021.3E-01Information Remaining (%)7550251.7E-010A Sorensen Similarity Distance Index analysis using all native fish and G1-G3 musseldistribution (current and historical presence/absence) showed the distribution of species withinthe Saco-Merrrimack-Charles EDU and Lower Connecticut EDU are extremely similar. TheLower Connecticut EDU and Saco-Merrimack-Charles EDU shared 40 of 47 species. The onlydifferences was that satinfin shiner, gizzard shad, rainwater killifish, sheepshead minnow did notoccur in the Saco-Merrimack-Charles and lake trout, lake whitefish, and northern redbelly dacedid not occur in the Lower Connecticut. The satinfin shiner, rainwater killifish, sheepsheadminnow, and gizzard shad appear to be at the northeastern limit of its range. The satinfin shineroccurs in only the Saugatuck watershed within the Lower Connecticut EDU, but its distributionextends extensively south to North Carolina. The sheepshead minnow, rainwater killifish, andgizzard shad occur in coastal estuarine areas from Cape Cod to Texas but do not appear to havebeen able to colonize north of the Cape (Williams 2002). Lake trout and lake whitefish are likelyabsent from the Lower Connecticut EDU as they prefer cold deep lakes and cold large rivers thatare lacking in the Lower Connecticut EDU. Northern redbelly dace prefer colder boggy waterand sluggish mud bottom creeks and boggy ponds that are also absent in the Lower ConnecticutEDU.The next most similar EDU to the Lower Connecticut and Saco-Merrimack-Charles is the CapeCod EDU. These three EDUs share 29 of the total 53 fish species . All fish in the Cape Cod EDUalso occured in the Lower Connecticut EDU, and 27 of the 29 Cape fish also occurred in theSaco-Merrimack-Charles EDU (Sheepshead minnow and rainwater killifish were missing fromthe Saco-Merrimack-Charles, per above distribution limit discussion.) The fish fauna of the Capethus appears to be a subset of the fauna of the Lower Connecticut and Saco-Merrimack-Charlesedu. Native Fish that occurred in all EDUs except for the Cape Cod EDU included lake trout,spottail shiner, lake chub, longnose sucker, atlantic salmon, slimy sculpin, creek chub, longnosedace, redbreast sunfish, and blacknose dace. As mentioned previously, the Cape Cod EDU lacksany rivers greater than size 2 and has quite uniform low gradient physical habitat throughout andthis limited physical habitat diversity likely limits the number of species that can find adequatehabitat in this EDU.The Upper Connecticut EDU and Middle Connecticut EDU show greater divergence from theCape, Lower Connecticut, and Saco-Merrimack-Charles EDUs. The Upper Connecticut andMiddle Connecticut EDUs share 26 species of their 38 total species. One species, eastern silveryminnow, occurred in both the Middle Connecticut and Upper Connecticut but was missing fromthe Lower Connecticut, Cape, and Saco-Merrimack-Charles. Eight fish species (alewife,American brook lamprey, fourspine stickleback, hickory shad, ninespine stickleback, stripedbass, swamp darter, and threespine stickleback) occurred in the Lower Connecticut, Cape, andSaco-Merrimack-Charles but did not occur in either the Upper or Middle Connecticut EDU.REVISED 6/2003AQUA-RESULTS-8

occurring in all EDUs and 28-32 of the 33 watersheds include common shiner, longnose dace,tessellated darter, banded killifish, redbreast sunfish, American eel, blacknose dace, and fallfish.These fish are associated with the widespread and common aquatic habitats of the region andappear to tolerate the ranges of climate and stream temperature that normally occurs across theregion. Although all these fish occur throughout the analysis area, some species such as whitesuckers, yellow perch, golden shines, and common shiners appear to be aquatic habitatgeneralists. They use a wide range of local habitats from creeks to small and medium rivers tolarge lakes and have ranges that extend significantly outside the region (Page and Burr 2001).Other species such as brown bullhead, brook trout, dace, fallfish, and tessellated darter preferspecific habitats that although specific, are widespread throughout the analysis region. Forexample, Brown bullheads need the deep water of large lakes and rivers, that occur in everyEDU (Williams 2002). Brook trout need cool, oxygen-rich creeks to medium rivers that are alsocommon habitats throughout the region. Blacknose dace, fallfish, and longnose dace prefer fastercurrent streams with gravel to rocky substrate. Blacknose and longnose dace prefer springs andcool, clear creeks with moderate to swift currents over gravel or rocks, with longnose dacepreferring slightly faster currents. Fallfish avoid small streams but prefer gravel, rubble bottomedpools and runs of small to medium rivers and lake margins. Certain widely distributed fish in thisregion such as banded killifish and tessellated darter prefer slower current waters that are alsocommonly found in this region. American eels are fish with a unique catadromous life historythat are widely distributed throughout the region. Non-native fish that occur in the regionincluded the bluntnose minnow, brown trout, cutlips minnow, fathead minnow, largemouth bass,pearl dace, pumpkinseed, rainbow trout, rock bass, round-whitefish, and trout-perch. Lake trout,rainbow smelt, and burbot were native in some of the watersheds and non-native in others.The increased numbers of species present in the Lower Connecticut EDU and Saco-Merrimack-Charles EDU in comparison to the Middle Connecticut, Upper Connecticut, and Cape EDUlikely represents the increased diversity of aquatic habitat niches within these EDUs, particularlytheir direct connection with the ocean. The Lower Connecticut and Saco-Merrimack-CharlesEDU have both diverse u<strong>plan</strong>d areas of habitat as well as significant sections of large, medium,and small coastal rivers where estuarine habitat is abundant and where there are access points foranadromous and catadromous species. The Cape Cod EDU has direct connection with the oceanand estuarine habitat; however, the sizes of rivers in the Cape Cod EDU are quite small; there areno size 3 rivers and only 5 examples of size 2 rivers. The Cape Cod EDU is also quite uniform inits physical habitat diversity that may also limit the number of species that can find adequatehabitat in this EDU. The dominance of higher gradient stream systems, higher elevations andcolder temperatures, and the lack of estuarine habitat limits the aquatic habitat niches available inthe Middle and Upper Connecticut EDUs. Certain species likely experience physiological limitsto the colder climate in these EDUs which may explain the lower number of species in theseEDUs.REVISED 6/2003AQUA-RESULTS-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!