Although the five EDUs had been previously qualitatively derived by TNC Freshwater Initiativestaff in 1999-2000, this analysis developed more quantitative descriptions of the physical settingand fish and mussel biota of the Ecological Drainage Units as follows:Physical DescriptionsTable 1: Physical Descriptions of Ecological Drainage UnitsEDU: Total Areaand river length byriver size classI. Cape Cod1160 sq.mi.Rivers:Size 2 = 86 mi.Size 1 = 916 mi.II. Saco –Merrimack –Charles9750 sq.mi.Rivers:Size 4 = 345 mi.Size 3 =695 mi.Size 2 =1603 mi.Size 1 = 12295 mi.III. LowerConnecticut9190 sq.mi.Rivers:Size4 = 338 mi.Size 3 = 570 mi.Size 2 = 1358 mi.Size 1 = 11546 mi.RiversIncludes Cape Codcoastal rivers directlydraining to the oceansuch as North, Sippican,Washpee, Quaeshunt,Slogums, West Port,along with manysmaller coastaltributaries andintermittent streams.Very large rivers (size4) include the Saco andMerrimack. Largeinland rivers draining tothe coast include thePresumpscot,Piscataqua-SalmonFalls, and Charles.Large inland riversdraining to theMerrimack include thePemigewasset,Contoocook,Piscataquog, Suncook,Nashua, andConcord. Largetributaries of the Sacoinclude the Ossipee andSwift. Medium sizedcoastal rivers drainingdirectly to the coastinclude the Neponset,Charles, Saugus,Ipswich, Parker, York,Mousam, Kennebunk,Little, and Royal.Very large rivers (size4) include theHousatonic,Connecticut, andThames, with theConnecticut being byfar the largest river.Large rivers draining tothe coast include thePawcatuck-Wood,Pawtuxet, Blackstone,and Taunton. Largerivers draining to thePhysical DescriptionLow elevation, very low gradient, acidic rivers primarily upon coarsegrained sediments. The elevation is entirely within the 0-800ft elevationzone, with the highest elevation being 377ft. Landforms are dominated bydry flats (64%) and wet/moist flats (19%). Bedrock is primarily acidicgranitic (46%) or recorded as extremely deep coarse grained sediment(47%). A small amount of acidic sed/metased and intermediategranitic/mafic bedrock exists. Surficial material is primarily coarse-grainedstratified sediments (73%) or till (13%) with small amount of fine-grainedsediment (6%) along the Taunton River. The EDU is 72% natural landcover with 8% in agricultural use and 21% developed.This EDU includes a diversity of aquatic habitats from northernmountainous, high elevation, high gradient systems dominated by cliffs,steep side slopes, coves and confined channels to southern, low elevation,very low gradient, meandering marshy, coastal systems. These systemscross a variety of bedrock and surficial material leading streams to have avariety of acidic to calc-neutral chemistry and flashy to stable hydrologicregimes. The elevation ranges from 0m to 6200 ft. in the White Mountainsof New Hampshire. The vast majority of the EDU is within the 0-800 ft.zone (76%) and a moderate amount in the 800-1700 ft. zone (19%).Landforms are dominated by gently sloping flats (26%) and dry flats(27%), but include substantial amounts of sideslope/summit features(22%). Bedrock is primarily acidic granitic (50%) with large amounts ofacidic sed/metased (24%), and small amounts of mafic/intermediategranitic (7%). A moderate amount of calcareous material is found (4% verycalcareous, 15% moderately calcareous) with the calcareous materialconcentrated in local areas of the Nashua River and Saco River andcovering nearly all the lower sections of the Presumpscot, Merrimack, andcoastal rivers of the Piscataqua-Salmon Falls watershed. Surficial materialis primarily till (47%), with moderate amounts of coarse-grained stratifiedsediments (22%) and patchy quaternary (19%), small amount of finegrainedsediment (9%). The patchy material occurs in the higher elevationmountainous areas of New Hampshire and Maine. The coarse-grained andfine-grained deposits are found primarily along the courses of the mediumto larger rivers, with an additional large area of fine-grained sediment ofmarine clay origin near the coast in the Presumpscot, Saco, and Piscataqua-Salmon Falls Watersheds. The EDU is 81% natural land cover with 8% inagricultural use and 12% developed.Primarily acidic, low elevation, low to very low gradient rivers, with only afew medium gradient headwater systems. The Housatonic watershedcontains substantial areas of calcareous bedrock influence. The vastmajority of the EDU falls within the 0-800 ft. zone (76%) and a moderateamount in the 800-1700 ft. zone (22%). The elevation ranges from 0m toover 2605ft in the Berkshire/Taconic mountains in Massachusetts.Landforms are dominated by dry flats (39%), and gently sloping flats(25%), with some sideslopes/summits (13%). (Bedrock is primarily acidicsed/metased (48%) with significant amounts of acidic granitic (26%) andmafic/intermediate granitic (16%). A small amount of calcareous materialoccurs (5% very calcareous sed/metased, 5% moderately calcareoussed/metased), concentrated in the Upper Housatonic and the Shebaug.Surficial material is primarily till (71%), with a moderate amount of coarseREVISED 6/2003AQUA-RESULTS-3
IV. MiddleConnecticut3450 sq.mi.Rivers:Size 4 = 402 mi.Size 3 = 158 mi.Size 2 = 339 mi.Size 1 = 4359 mi.V. UpperConnecticut4640 sq.mi.Rivers:Size 4 = 140 mi.Size 3 = 228 mi.Size 2 = 537 mi.Size 1 = 3606 mi.Connecticut include theFarmington, Westfield,and Chicopee. Largeriver tributaries of theThames include theShetucket andQuinebaug. Mediumrivers draining directlyto the ocean include theSaugatuck, Mill,Hammonasset, Niantic,Palmer.The only very largeriver is the Connecticut.Large tributaries of theConnecticut include theAshuelot, Deerfield,Millers, and Sugar.The only very largeriver is the Connecticut.Large tributaries of theConnecticut include theAmmonoosuc, Black,Ottauquechee,Passumpsic, UpperAmmonoosuc, West,and Whitegrained stratified sediment (22%), and small amount fine grained sediment(4%). The fine-grained sediment is concentrated along the direct floodplainof the mainstem Lower Connecticut. The EDU is 72% natural land coverwith 12% in agricultural use and 16% developed.Primarily medium elevation, medium gradient rivers headwaters drainingto low elevation, low gradient systems entering the Connecticut mainstem.Predominantely acidic chemistry system except for small calcareous areaswest of the Connecticut mainstem. The elevation ranges from 0m to 4728ft,with the majority of the EDU within the 800-1700 ft. zone (56%), a largeamount of in the 0-800 ft. zone (32%) and a small amount in the 1700-2500ft. zone (10%). Landforms are dominated by sideslopes/summits (44%) andgently sloping flats (22%). Bedrock is primarily acidic sed/metased (44%)with large amount of acidic granitic (26%), and small amountmafic/intermediate granitic (13%). A small amount of calcareous materialis found on the western side of the Connecticut mainstem, particularly inthe lower Deerfield (8% very calcareous, 7% moderately calcareous).Surficial material is primarily till (65%) with large amount of patchyquaternary (15%) and some coarse-grained stratified (13%) and finegrained(7%). The fine-grained sediment is found primarily along theConnecticut River mainstem. The EDU is 84% natural land cover with11% agricultural use and 5% developed.Medium to high elevation systems with a range of gradients but largeamount of high gradient tributaries. Acidic chemistry systems are dominanteast of the Connecticut mainstem, while west of the Connecticut calcareoussystems dominate. The elevation ranges from 0m to 6250ft in the WhiteMountains of New Hampshire. The majority of the EDU is within the 800-1700 ft. zone (61%), with a large amount of in the 1700-2500 ft. zone(27%) and a small amount in the 0-800 ft. zone (6%) and 2500+ ft. zone(6%). Landforms are dominated by sideslopes/summits (70%) and gentlysloping flats (17%). Bedrock is a mixture of acidic sed/metased (33%),acidic granitic (28%), very calcareous sed/metased (18%), moderatelycalcareous sed/metased (15%), with only a small amount ofmafic/intermediate granitic (6%). The calcareous material is concentratedon the western side of the Connecticut mainstem. Surficial material isprimarily till (56%) and patchy quaternary (37%), with a small amount ofcoarse-grained sediment (7%) and fine-grained sediment (2%). The EDU is90% natural land with 8% in agricultural use and 1% developed.Characteristic Fish and Mussels (from NatureServe Database, 2002)Fish and rare mussel species distribution data by 8-digit watershed was obtained fromNatureServe’s Fish and G1-G3 Mussel datbase of 2002 and summarized by Ecological DrainageUnit (Table 3). A tabulation of the 61 fish species that occurred in the analysis area showed that32 species (28 native) occurred in the Upper Connecticut EDU, 41 (36 native) occurred in theMiddle Connecticut EDU, 53 (44 native) occurred in the Lower Connecticut EDU, 48 (43 native)occurred in the Saco-Merrimack-Charles EDU, and 35 (31 native) occurred in the Cape CodEDU. Of the 3 G1-G3 Mussels for that distribution data was available, the Dwarf Wedgemusseloccurred in all 5 EDUs, the Brook Floater occurred in all except the Cape Cod EDU, and theYellow Lampmussel occurred in only the Middle Connecticut EDU.REVISED 6/2003AQUA-RESULTS-4
- Page 1 and 2:
Lower New England - Northern Piedmo
- Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSCOVERINTRODUCTIONA
- Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionEcoregional Planning in
- Page 7 and 8:
AcknowledgementsEdited Version and
- Page 9 and 10:
combinations based on surficial geo
- Page 11 and 12:
Priorities and Leadership Assignmen
- Page 13 and 14:
Portfolio SummaryA total of 1,028 s
- Page 15 and 16:
each local population with respect
- Page 17 and 18:
potential target list for future co
- Page 19 and 20:
iteration ecoregional plans, specie
- Page 21 and 22:
RESULTS FOR SPECIES *Modification t
- Page 23 and 24:
documented in BCD making analysis v
- Page 25 and 26:
PLANNING METHODS FOR ECOREGIONAL TA
- Page 27 and 28:
sandy outwash and forested swamps a
- Page 29 and 30:
and distribution pattern for each e
- Page 31 and 32:
disproportionately large percentage
- Page 33 and 34:
to that ecoregion alone. Those syst
- Page 35 and 36:
Locating examples of patch-forming
- Page 37 and 38:
systems. Conversely, high elevation
- Page 39 and 40:
The minimum goals based on generic
- Page 41 and 42:
Results for Terrestrial Communities
- Page 43 and 44: Table 6. Minimum conservation bench
- Page 45 and 46: • The National Vegetation Classif
- Page 47 and 48: of ecoregions, from the Northern Ap
- Page 49 and 50: How much larger than the severe dam
- Page 51 and 52: Scaling factors for Matrix Forest S
- Page 53 and 54: Roads are also source areas for noi
- Page 55 and 56: ungulates. We simply discussed thes
- Page 57 and 58: conservation plan must be done to r
- Page 59 and 60: position, its geology and its eleva
- Page 61 and 62: this block, miles of streams, dams
- Page 63 and 64: Connecting Area or Ecological Backd
- Page 65 and 66: MATRIX SITE:NAME:STATE/S:SIZE:Total
- Page 67 and 68: Block developmentTwo sets of ecoblo
- Page 69 and 70: Table 12. A description of the elev
- Page 71 and 72: There are 27 ELU types entirely mis
- Page 73 and 74: Freshwater Ecoregions and Ecologica
- Page 75 and 76: classes: size 1) headwaters to smal
- Page 77 and 78: Figure 2: Watershed Aquatic System
- Page 79 and 80: targets should also include conside
- Page 81 and 82: have also not been extensively rese
- Page 83 and 84: Table 5: Confidence Code1 High Conf
- Page 85 and 86: TYPECHARACTERISTICSELU signatureSIZ
- Page 87 and 88: Midreach streamentering large lakes
- Page 89 and 90: Major stresses: Using the following
- Page 91 and 92: Aquatic Systems Results for Lower N
- Page 93: Figure 1: Ecological Drainage Unit
- Page 97 and 98: Table 3: Fish and Mussel Distributi
- Page 99 and 100: merrlowctcapeupctmidct3E-03100Nativ
- Page 101 and 102: Figure 2: Size 2 Watershed SystemsR
- Page 103 and 104: TWINSPAN RelationshipsThe hierarchi
- Page 105 and 106: 13 and 14 split from 15-17 primaril
- Page 107 and 108: Table 5: Size 2 Watershed System Su
- Page 109 and 110: Table 6: Size 3 Watershed System Su
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 7: Reach Gradient ClassesREV
- Page 113 and 114: Of these 480 possible combinations,
- Page 115 and 116: Units supported the distinctiveness
- Page 117 and 118: Condition ResultsGIS ScreeningSize
- Page 119 and 120: Size 2 Watershed: Landscape Context
- Page 121 and 122: Table 10: Size 2 Watershed Landscap
- Page 123 and 124: Table 16: Dams on Size 2, 3,4 River
- Page 125 and 126: Most of the dams in the analysis re
- Page 127 and 128: shallow water fish spawning grounds
- Page 129 and 130: Figure 11: Aquatic PortfolioREVISED
- Page 131 and 132: Table 19: Size 3 Watershed System T
- Page 133 and 134: Table 21: Portfolio Examples by EDU
- Page 135 and 136: Range in Landscape Context Ranking
- Page 137 and 138: Table 25: Upper Connecticut Portfol
- Page 139 and 140: Table 27: Portfolio Size 2-4 Exampl
- Page 141 and 142: 2_24 S2c Assabet River 5.45 18.03 S
- Page 143 and 144: For the medium to large sized river
- Page 145 and 146:
tributaries of the Assonet, Namaske
- Page 147 and 148:
Threats AssessmentThe Core Team mad
- Page 149 and 150:
• Work with TNC Eastern Conservat
- Page 151 and 152:
GlossaryThese selective glossary en
- Page 153 and 154:
Ecological Land Unit (ELU):Mapping
- Page 155 and 156:
Integration: A portfolio assembly p
- Page 157 and 158:
Representativeness: Captures multip
- Page 159 and 160:
Appendix 1Lower New England/Norther
- Page 161 and 162:
Appendix 1Lower New England/Norther
- Page 163 and 164:
Appendix 1Lower New England/Norther
- Page 165 and 166:
KEY TO TERMS OF FEDERALLY LISTED SP
- Page 167 and 168:
Appendix 1Lower New England/Norther
- Page 169 and 170:
Appendix 1Lower New England/Norther
- Page 171 and 172:
Appendix 1.Lower New England/Northe
- Page 173 and 174:
Appendix 1Lower New England\Norther
- Page 175 and 176:
Appendix 1Lower New England\Norther
- Page 177 and 178:
Appendix 2Lower New England\Norther
- Page 179 and 180:
Appendix 3Lower New England\Norther
- Page 181 and 182:
Appendix 3Lower New England\Norther
- Page 183 and 184:
Appendix 3Lower New England\Norther
- Page 185 and 186:
Appendix 3Lower New England\Norther
- Page 187 and 188:
Appendix 4.Lower New England\Northe
- Page 189 and 190:
Appendix 5Lower New England\Norther
- Page 191 and 192:
Appendix 5Lower New England\Norther
- Page 193 and 194:
Appendix 6.Lower New England\Northe
- Page 195 and 196:
Appendix 6.Lower New England\Northe
- Page 197 and 198:
DRAFT LNE-NP Ecoregional Plan 9\20\
- Page 199 and 200:
BibiliographyLower New England GIS
- Page 201 and 202:
BibiliographyD.P. (compilers), 1994
- Page 203 and 204:
Bailey, R.G., P.E. Avers, T. King,
- Page 205 and 206:
Gerritsen, J., M.T. Barbour, and K.
- Page 207 and 208:
Leopold, L.B. and Wolman, M.G. 1957
- Page 209 and 210:
Pulliam, H.R., 1988. Sources, sinks
- Page 211 and 212:
Steedman, R.J. 1988. Modification a