13.07.2015 Views

Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway

Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway

Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Results for Matrix-Forming Ecosystems *Modifications to Standard MethodSize criteriaFor area-sensitive and breeding territory analyses of species, we developed a list offorest–interior dependent species typical of LNE-NP that included cavity-nesting, nonmigratory bird species such as Barred Owls (Strix varia) that prefer deep woods withlarge cavity trees and neotropical migratory species such as: Hairy Woodpecker (Picoidesvillosus), Broad-winged Hawk (Buteo platypterus), Eastern Wood-Peewee (Contopusvirens), White-breasted Nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis), Veery (Catharus fuscescens),Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina), Black-and-white Warbler (Mniotilta varia),Canada Warbler (Wilsonia canadensis), Northern Waterthrush (Seiurus noveboracensis),Black-throated Blue Warbler (Dendroica caerulescens), American Redstart (Setophagaruticilla), Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapillus), Scarlet Tanager (Piranga olivacea), andYellow-throated Vireo (Vireo flavifrons). There were no mammals in this ecoregion thatwere completely dependent on interior forest although grey fox prefers dense forest withnumerous logs for denning.We adopted Robbins’ (1989) 10,000 acres guideline assuming it takes 10,000 acres ofroad-bounded area to get a 7500 acre core area for retaining all neotropical bird speciesbased partially on a recommendation from Bob Askins who had found similar patternsand results in southern Connecticut (Askins et al. 1987) a region he considered roughlysimilar to Robbins’ study area with regard to forest cover (Askins pers. comm.). Theresulting scaling factors and reserve sizes for LNE-NP are shown below:DISTURBANCES(4 X's the historicsevere-destructionpatch size)Scaling factors and Reserve size for Matrix forests in Lower New England/N. Piedmont Ecoregion:Fires (NH & TH)HurricanesFires (Oak)*DownburstsTornadosBlackBearSPECIES(25 X's the meanfemale home range)Broad-wingedHawkBarred OwlMooseFisherNeotropical birdsBobcat0 2 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 // 75 // 150Reserve size in 1000s of acresFactors to the left of the arrow should be encompassed by a 15,000 acre reserve NH = N. hardwoods (Maple-Beech-Birch)TH = Transitional Hardwoods (Red oak-White Pine, Red Oak -Sugar Maple)* Oak forests are dependent on relatively high-frequency, moderate fires, info on catastrophic fires is sketchyNeotropical estimates based on Robbins et al. 1989, see text for full ex<strong>plan</strong>ation.* Anderson, M.G. and S.L. Bernstein (editors). 2003. Results for matrix-forming ecosystems . Based onBarbour, H. 2001. Lower New England – Northern Piedmont Ecoregional <strong>Conservation</strong> Plan; FirstIteration. The Nature Conservancy, <strong>Conservation</strong> Science Support, Northeast & Caribbean Division,Boston, MA.MATRIX-RESULTS-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!