Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway
Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway
Table MAT2-Expanded. Example of nesting territory sizes for some deciduous treenesting birds in Lower New England. The literature-derived mean for 25-femalebreeding territory is shown in column 2. Column 5 is Robbins et al. 1989 estimate ofminimum area requirements (MAR). Columns 6 and 7 illustrate Partners-in-Flight(PIF) importance score for the species within the ecoregion.SPECIESAcres x25Meanterritory(acres)MeanHomeRangeMARacresPIF10scorePIF27scoreReferencesBroad-winged hawk 14225 569 0 3 4 .89miles between nests (569acres) Goodrich et al 1996,1-2 square miles (Stokes)Cooper's Hawk 12500 500 2718 0 3 2 densities 0.2 pairs/100 acres (Stewart & Robbins 58)//Little information on territoriality but minimum distancebetween nests is 0.7-1.0 kmNorthern Goshawk 10500 420 5028 0 3 1-2 square miles (Stokes). // 170 ha surrounding thenest BNA =420 acresEastern Wood-PeweeYellow-throatedVireo300 12 0 5 4 1.4-3.1: Fawver 1947, 2-6 (Stokes)// 2.2 ha Iowa, 7.7 hain Wisconsin averages BNA =12.2 acres185 7.4 0 3 2 3 males/100 acres in MD floodplain, 8/100 in riparianswamp, 19/100 in deciduous forest, (Stewart & Robbins1958 //Populations are sparse and little competitionevident but most activity occurs within 100 m of nest or 3ha area. (BNA)Philadelphia Vireo 87.5 3.5 0 2 0.3-0.8 ha Ontario, 0.5-4.0 NH. Overlap with red-eyedVireo.Warbling Vireo 82.5 3.3 0 2 3 10 males/100 acres in MD riparian and field, (Stewart &Robbins 1958)// 1.2 ha AZ, 1.45 ha CA, 1.2 IL, 1.2-1.5Ontario, 1.5 ha Alberta =avg 1.34 ha=3.3 acresBaltimore Oriole 75 3 1.6 0 4 5 3 acres (Stokes). //Varies with habitat quality, foodavailability, population density and time of breeding.Only nesting area defended (BNA)Cerulean Warbler 65 2.6 1729 2 5 males per 50 acres in birch basswood forest (Vanvelzan) //Mean breeding territories 1.04 ha SD 0.16 BNA=2.6 acresBlue-grayGnatcatcher42.5 1.7 9.8 91 4 1 7 pairs/100 acres in MD floodplain, (Stewart & Robbins1958)// Mean territory size: 0.4 ha FL.1.8 ha CA, 0.7 haVT, (=1.7 acres VT) Difference may reflect environment.Territory size decrease over season and adults tend tostay within 50 meters of nest.7/2003 – REVIEWER COMMENTS INCORPORATED MATRIX-19
MATRIX SITE:NAME:STATE/S:SIZE:Total acreage of the matrix site:Core acreage of the matrix site:% Core acreage of the matrix site:% Core acreage in natural cover:% Core acreage in non- natural cover:26Merry Meeting LakesNHCOMMENTS: collected during potential matrix site meetings, Summer 1999Old growth:Logging history:Other comments:Road density:Unique features:Ecological features,EO's, ExpectedCommunities:(Core acreage = > 200m from major road or airport and >100m from localroads, railroads and utility lines)INTERNAL LAND BLOCKS OVER 5k:Average acreage of land blocks within the matrix site:Maximum acreage of any land block within the matrix site:Total acreage of the matrix site that is part of 5000 + acre sized landblocks:% of the total acreage of the matrix site that is made up of 5000 +acre sized land blocks:Internal Land Block Size Distribution:MANAGED AREAS:(Conservation and other Federal / State managed parcels > 500acres)# Parcels in block PercentAcresManaged Area Total17 73,56415 Largest managed area parcels within siteNameunknown; mature forestless of an agricultural history here because higher elevation androugher topography. 3rd and 4th growth or more.invasives, two 10-15K blocks. Divided by rt. Kings Highway – localroad, paved and canopy covered for large portions and just a littledevelopment.low (maybe moderate) mixed paved and gravel except the twolarger. A number of class six trails. A number gated.some neat geology; some mining. Some active low bush blueberrymanagement on the peaks. Period burning. Ledges – ravens, turkeyvultures, bobcat. Fairly uneven terrain.
- Page 13 and 14: Portfolio SummaryA total of 1,028 s
- Page 15 and 16: each local population with respect
- Page 17 and 18: potential target list for future co
- Page 19 and 20: iteration ecoregional plans, specie
- Page 21 and 22: RESULTS FOR SPECIES *Modification t
- Page 23 and 24: documented in BCD making analysis v
- Page 25 and 26: PLANNING METHODS FOR ECOREGIONAL TA
- Page 27 and 28: sandy outwash and forested swamps a
- Page 29 and 30: and distribution pattern for each e
- Page 31 and 32: disproportionately large percentage
- Page 33 and 34: to that ecoregion alone. Those syst
- Page 35 and 36: Locating examples of patch-forming
- Page 37 and 38: systems. Conversely, high elevation
- Page 39 and 40: The minimum goals based on generic
- Page 41 and 42: Results for Terrestrial Communities
- Page 43 and 44: Table 6. Minimum conservation bench
- Page 45 and 46: • The National Vegetation Classif
- Page 47 and 48: of ecoregions, from the Northern Ap
- Page 49 and 50: How much larger than the severe dam
- Page 51 and 52: Scaling factors for Matrix Forest S
- Page 53 and 54: Roads are also source areas for noi
- Page 55 and 56: ungulates. We simply discussed thes
- Page 57 and 58: conservation plan must be done to r
- Page 59 and 60: position, its geology and its eleva
- Page 61 and 62: this block, miles of streams, dams
- Page 63: Connecting Area or Ecological Backd
- Page 67 and 68: Block developmentTwo sets of ecoblo
- Page 69 and 70: Table 12. A description of the elev
- Page 71 and 72: There are 27 ELU types entirely mis
- Page 73 and 74: Freshwater Ecoregions and Ecologica
- Page 75 and 76: classes: size 1) headwaters to smal
- Page 77 and 78: Figure 2: Watershed Aquatic System
- Page 79 and 80: targets should also include conside
- Page 81 and 82: have also not been extensively rese
- Page 83 and 84: Table 5: Confidence Code1 High Conf
- Page 85 and 86: TYPECHARACTERISTICSELU signatureSIZ
- Page 87 and 88: Midreach streamentering large lakes
- Page 89 and 90: Major stresses: Using the following
- Page 91 and 92: Aquatic Systems Results for Lower N
- Page 93 and 94: Figure 1: Ecological Drainage Unit
- Page 95 and 96: IV. MiddleConnecticut3450 sq.mi.Riv
- Page 97 and 98: Table 3: Fish and Mussel Distributi
- Page 99 and 100: merrlowctcapeupctmidct3E-03100Nativ
- Page 101 and 102: Figure 2: Size 2 Watershed SystemsR
- Page 103 and 104: TWINSPAN RelationshipsThe hierarchi
- Page 105 and 106: 13 and 14 split from 15-17 primaril
- Page 107 and 108: Table 5: Size 2 Watershed System Su
- Page 109 and 110: Table 6: Size 3 Watershed System Su
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 7: Reach Gradient ClassesREV
- Page 113 and 114: Of these 480 possible combinations,
Table MAT2-Expanded. Example of nesting territory sizes for some deciduous treenesting birds in Lower New England. The literature-derived mean for 25-femalebreeding territory is shown in column 2. Column 5 is Robbins et al. 1989 estimate ofminimum area requirements (MAR). Columns 6 and 7 illustrate Partners-in-Flight(PIF) importance score for the species within the ecoregion.SPECIESAcres x25Meanterritory(acres)MeanHomeRangeMARacresPIF10scorePIF27scoreReferencesBroad-winged hawk 14225 569 0 3 4 .89miles between nests (569acres) Goodrich et al 1996,1-2 square miles (Stokes)Cooper's Hawk 12500 500 2718 0 3 2 densities 0.2 pairs/100 acres (Stewart & Robbins 58)//Little information on territoriality but minimum distancebetween nests is 0.7-1.0 kmNorthern Goshawk 10500 420 5028 0 3 1-2 square miles (Stokes). // 170 ha surrounding thenest BNA =420 acresEastern Wood-PeweeYellow-throatedVireo300 12 0 5 4 1.4-3.1: Fawver 1947, 2-6 (Stokes)// 2.2 ha Iowa, 7.7 hain Wisconsin averages BNA =12.2 acres185 7.4 0 3 2 3 males/100 acres in MD floodplain, 8/100 in riparianswamp, 19/100 in deciduous forest, (Stewart & Robbins1958 //Populations are sparse and little competitionevident but most activity occurs within 100 m of nest or 3ha area. (BNA)Philadelphia Vireo 87.5 3.5 0 2 0.3-0.8 ha Ontario, 0.5-4.0 NH. Overlap with red-eyedVireo.Warbling Vireo 82.5 3.3 0 2 3 10 males/100 acres in MD riparian and field, (Stewart &Robbins 1958)// 1.2 ha AZ, 1.45 ha CA, 1.2 IL, 1.2-1.5Ontario, 1.5 ha Alberta =avg 1.34 ha=3.3 acresBaltimore Oriole 75 3 1.6 0 4 5 3 acres (Stokes). //Varies with habitat quality, foodavailability, population density and time of breeding.Only nesting area defended (BNA)Cerulean Warbler 65 2.6 1729 2 5 males per 50 acres in birch basswood forest (Vanvelzan) //Mean breeding territories 1.04 ha SD 0.16 BNA=2.6 acresBlue-grayGnatcatcher42.5 1.7 9.8 91 4 1 7 pairs/100 acres in MD floodplain, (Stewart & Robbins1958)// Mean territory size: 0.4 ha FL.1.8 ha CA, 0.7 haVT, (=1.7 acres VT) Difference may reflect environment.Territory size decrease over season and adults tend tostay within 50 meters of nest.7/2003 – REVIEWER COMMENTS INCORPORATED MATRIX-19