Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 3Lower New England\Northern PiedmontCommunity Associations arranged by group type, subregion, and subsection with distribution and goalsLNP Major GroupLNP Sub-GroupLNP ScaleLNP DistrGOALElCodeGnameTrans221Db221Da221Dc221Am221Ba221Bc221Bb221Ae221Af221Ag221Ah221Ai221AlM212CbM212CcM212BbM212BdM212BcTidal SP P 3 CEGL006337 (SPECKLED ALDER, SMOOTH ALDER) - SILKY DOGWOOD SHRUBLAND 1 2Tidal SP P/0 3 CEGL006150 Switchgrass Tidal Herbaceous VegetationTidal SP P/W 3 CEGL006325 Mixed Forbs (High Marsh) Tidal Herbaceous VegetationTidal SP P/W 3 CEGL004472 Broadleaf Pondlily Tidal Herbaceous Vegetation 2 2 0 1 0Tidal SP P? 3 CEGL006165 Red Maple - Green Ash / Smartweed species WoodlandTidal SP W 6 CEGL004202 Wild Rice Tidal Herbaceous Vegetation 2 2 0 1 0Tidal SP W 6 CEGL006352 Estuary Pipewort - Dotted Smartweed Herbaceous VegetationTidal SP W 6 CEGL006080 Water-hemp Tidal Herbaceous Vegetation 1 2 2Patch type: M= matrix; LP=large patch; SP=small patch; Rangewide distribution: R= Restricted; L= Limited; W= Widespread; P= Peripheral. Subsection distribution: 2= known to occur; 1= probably occurs; 0= does not occur. Blank field = No Information.9/20/2000 CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT 6
Appendix 4.Lower New England\Northern PiedmontMatrix Forest Associations within Tier 1 Preferred Sites; preliminary analysisNo.of potentialmatrix sitescharacteristic ofthese typesNo. of Tier 1Preferred Siteschosen for thePortfolioGeneral Forest Type Matrix Forest AssociationsCentral Hardwoods 19 12Scarlet Oak - Black Oak - Sassafras ForestMixed Oak - Flowering Dogwood ForestChestnut Oak - Mixed Oak ForestHemlock - Northern Hardwoods ForestRed Oak - Sugar Maple - Tulip Tree ForestSugar Maple - Yellow Birch - Beech ForestPitch Pine - Oak ForestWhite Pine - Hemlock ForestBlack Oak - White Oak ForestTransitional Hardwoods 38 15Red Oak - Sugar Maple ForestRed Oak - White Pine ForestChestnut Oak - Black Oak ForestHemlock - Northern Hardwoods ForestSugar Maple - Yellow Birch - Beech ForestPitch Pine - Oak ForestHickory - Ostraya - Sedge ForestWhite Pine - Hemlock ForestMixed Oak - Flowering Dogwood ForestScarlet Oak - Black Oak - Sassafras ForestNorthern Hardwoods 32 13Red Oak - Sugar Maple - Tulip Tree ForestWhite Pine - Northern Hardwood ForestHemlock - Northern Hardwoods ForestSugar Maple - Yellow Birch - Beech ForestChestnut Oak - Black Oak - huckleberry ForestPitch Pine - Oak ForestHickory - Ostraya - Sedge ForestWhite Pine - Hemlock ForestMixed Oak - Flowering Dogwood ForestScarlet Oak - Black Oak - Sassafras Forest"Outliers" 4 2Blocks largely consisting of water9/20/2000 CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT 1
Page 1 and 2:
Lower New England - Northern Piedmo
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSCOVERINTRODUCTIONA
Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionEcoregional Planning in
Page 7 and 8:
AcknowledgementsEdited Version and
Page 9 and 10:
combinations based on surficial geo
Page 11 and 12:
Priorities and Leadership Assignmen
Page 13 and 14:
Portfolio SummaryA total of 1,028 s
Page 15 and 16:
each local population with respect
Page 17 and 18:
potential target list for future co
Page 19 and 20:
iteration ecoregional plans, specie
Page 21 and 22:
RESULTS FOR SPECIES *Modification t
Page 23 and 24:
documented in BCD making analysis v
Page 25 and 26:
PLANNING METHODS FOR ECOREGIONAL TA
Page 27 and 28:
sandy outwash and forested swamps a
Page 29 and 30:
and distribution pattern for each e
Page 31 and 32:
disproportionately large percentage
Page 33 and 34:
to that ecoregion alone. Those syst
Page 35 and 36:
Locating examples of patch-forming
Page 37 and 38:
systems. Conversely, high elevation
Page 39 and 40:
The minimum goals based on generic
Page 41 and 42:
Results for Terrestrial Communities
Page 43 and 44:
Table 6. Minimum conservation bench
Page 45 and 46:
• The National Vegetation Classif
Page 47 and 48:
of ecoregions, from the Northern Ap
Page 49 and 50:
How much larger than the severe dam
Page 51 and 52:
Scaling factors for Matrix Forest S
Page 53 and 54:
Roads are also source areas for noi
Page 55 and 56:
ungulates. We simply discussed thes
Page 57 and 58:
conservation plan must be done to r
Page 59 and 60:
position, its geology and its eleva
Page 61 and 62:
this block, miles of streams, dams
Page 63 and 64:
Connecting Area or Ecological Backd
Page 65 and 66:
MATRIX SITE:NAME:STATE/S:SIZE:Total
Page 67 and 68:
Block developmentTwo sets of ecoblo
Page 69 and 70:
Table 12. A description of the elev
Page 71 and 72:
There are 27 ELU types entirely mis
Page 73 and 74:
Freshwater Ecoregions and Ecologica
Page 75 and 76:
classes: size 1) headwaters to smal
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 2: Watershed Aquatic System
Page 79 and 80:
targets should also include conside
Page 81 and 82:
have also not been extensively rese
Page 83 and 84:
Table 5: Confidence Code1 High Conf
Page 85 and 86:
TYPECHARACTERISTICSELU signatureSIZ
Page 87 and 88:
Midreach streamentering large lakes
Page 89 and 90:
Major stresses: Using the following
Page 91 and 92:
Aquatic Systems Results for Lower N
Page 93 and 94:
Figure 1: Ecological Drainage Unit
Page 95 and 96:
IV. MiddleConnecticut3450 sq.mi.Riv
Page 97 and 98:
Table 3: Fish and Mussel Distributi
Page 99 and 100:
merrlowctcapeupctmidct3E-03100Nativ
Page 101 and 102:
Figure 2: Size 2 Watershed SystemsR
Page 103 and 104:
TWINSPAN RelationshipsThe hierarchi
Page 105 and 106:
13 and 14 split from 15-17 primaril
Page 107 and 108:
Table 5: Size 2 Watershed System Su
Page 109 and 110:
Table 6: Size 3 Watershed System Su
Page 111 and 112:
Figure 7: Reach Gradient ClassesREV
Page 113 and 114:
Of these 480 possible combinations,
Page 115 and 116:
Units supported the distinctiveness
Page 117 and 118:
Condition ResultsGIS ScreeningSize
Page 119 and 120:
Size 2 Watershed: Landscape Context
Page 121 and 122:
Table 10: Size 2 Watershed Landscap
Page 123 and 124:
Table 16: Dams on Size 2, 3,4 River
Page 125 and 126:
Most of the dams in the analysis re
Page 127 and 128:
shallow water fish spawning grounds
Page 129 and 130:
Figure 11: Aquatic PortfolioREVISED
Page 131 and 132:
Table 19: Size 3 Watershed System T
Page 133 and 134:
Table 21: Portfolio Examples by EDU
Page 135 and 136: Range in Landscape Context Ranking
Page 137 and 138: Table 25: Upper Connecticut Portfol
Page 139 and 140: Table 27: Portfolio Size 2-4 Exampl
Page 141 and 142: 2_24 S2c Assabet River 5.45 18.03 S
Page 143 and 144: For the medium to large sized river
Page 145 and 146: tributaries of the Assonet, Namaske
Page 147 and 148: Threats AssessmentThe Core Team mad
Page 149 and 150: • Work with TNC Eastern Conservat
Page 151 and 152: GlossaryThese selective glossary en
Page 153 and 154: Ecological Land Unit (ELU):Mapping
Page 155 and 156: Integration: A portfolio assembly p
Page 157 and 158: Representativeness: Captures multip
Page 159 and 160: Appendix 1Lower New England/Norther
Page 165 and 166: KEY TO TERMS OF FEDERALLY LISTED SP
Page 171 and 172: Appendix 1.Lower New England/Northe
Page 173 and 174: Appendix 1Lower New England\Norther
Page 185: Appendix 3Lower New England\Norther
Page 193 and 194: Appendix 6.Lower New England\Northe
Page 195 and 196: Appendix 6.Lower New England\Northe
Page 197 and 198: DRAFT LNE-NP Ecoregional Plan 9\20\
Page 199 and 200: BibiliographyLower New England GIS
Page 201 and 202: BibiliographyD.P. (compilers), 1994
Page 203 and 204: Bailey, R.G., P.E. Avers, T. King,
Page 205 and 206: Gerritsen, J., M.T. Barbour, and K.
Page 207 and 208: Leopold, L.B. and Wolman, M.G. 1957
Page 209 and 210: Pulliam, H.R., 1988. Sources, sinks
Page 211 and 212: Steedman, R.J. 1988. Modification a
show all

Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?