Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 1.Lower New England/Northern Piedmont EcoregionPrimary Vertebrate Target SpeciesViability and Subsection DistributionDRAFT 9\20\00 CONFIDENTIALSUBSECTION #221Ae221Ae Total221Af221Af Total221Ag221Ag Total221 Ah Total221Ai221Ai Total221Al Total221Am221Am Total221Ba221Ba TotalGNAME VIABILITY M Y N M Y N Y N M N M Y N M Y N Y N M Y N M Y N M Y N N N N Y N N NACIPENSER BREVIROSTRUM 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 12ACIPENSER OXYRINCHUS 1 1 2 2 1 1 4AMMOCRYPTA PELLUCIDA 3 3 3CLEMMYS MUHLENBERGII 10 15 30 55 7 1 22 30 4 9 19 32 3 3 4 2 16 22 1 26 78 105 2 2 5 1 6 1 1 256CROTALUS HORRIDUS 8 11 19 38 1 1 2 2 1 3 5 2 7 1 2 3 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 64MYOTIS LEIBII 2 2 2 1 3 1 1 2 4 4 11MYOTIS SODALIS 4 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 9NEOTOMA MAGISTER 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 6Grand Total 22 27 54 103 1 3 2 6 1 2 3 0 2 1 3 0 7 1 22 30 4 19 25 48 4 2 6 2 5 4 11 6 2 16 24 1 26 80 107 4 4 1 1 0 2 2 8 7 15 1 1 1 1 365221Bb221Bb Total221Bc221Bc Total221Da221Da Total221Db221Db Total221Dc221Dc TotalM212BbM212Bb TotalM212Bc Total221Bd221Bd TotalM212CbM212Cb TotalM212CcM212Cc TotalM221Da*M221Da Total*Grand Total of All EOs*Targets in subsections adjacent to the LNE/NP ecoregion.9/20/2000 Page 1 of 1
Appendix 1Lower New England\Northern PiedmontPrimary Invertebrate SpeciesProgress towards GoalsGNAME GCOMNAME DISTRIBUTION GOAL # of Eos# ACCEPTEDby Expert Team# ACCEPTEDinto the Portfolio GOAL METACRONICTA ALBARUFA BARRENS DAGGER MOTH L 10 to 20 1 1 1 NoALASMIDONTA HETERODON DWARF WEDGEMUSSEL W 5 to 10 22 13 13 YesALASMIDONTA VARICOSA BROOK FLOATER W 5 to 10 56 14 12 YesAMPHIPOEA EREPTA RYENSIS A NOCTUID MOTH R 20 1 1 0 NoCAECIDOTEA PRICEI PRICE'S CAVE ISOPOD L 10 to 20 10 3 1 NoCALEPHELIS BOREALIS NORTHERN METALMARK L 10 to 20 13 10 10 YesCALLOPHRYS IRUS FROSTED ELFIN L 10 to 20 33 22 22 YesCATOCALA HERODIAS GERHARDI HERODIAS UNDERWING P 5 to 10 0 0 0 NoCATOCALA PRETIOSA PRETIOSA L 10 to 20 0 0 0 NoCHAETAGLAEA CERATA A NOCTUID MOTH L 10 to 20 4 1 1 NoCICINDELA ANCOCISCONENSIS A TIGER BEETLE L 10 to 20 1 1 1 NoCICINDELA MARGINIPENNIS COBBLESTONE TIGER BEETLE L 10 to 20 9 8 8 NoCICINDELA PURITANA PURITAN TIGER BEETLE L 10 to 20 6 3 3 NoCINCINNATIA WINKLEYI NEW ENGLAND SILTSNAIL W 5 to 10 0 0 0 NoCRANGONYX ABERRANS MYSTIC RIVER AMPHIPOD L 10 to 20 0 0 0 NoCRANGONYX DEAROLFI PENNSYLVANIA CAVE AMPHIPOD L 10 to 20 1 0 0 NoENALLAGMA PICTUM SCARLET BLUE L/P 10 0 0 0 NoENALLAGMA RECURVATUM PINE BARRENS BLUET L/P 10 7 6 6 NoERYNNIS PERSIUS PERSIUS PERSIUS DUSKY WING L/P 10 5 3 3 NoEULIMNADIA STONINGTONENSIS A CLAM SHRIMP R 20 1 1 1 NoFONTIGENS BOTTIMERI APPALACHIAN SPRINGSNAIL R 30 3 3 3 NoGOMPHUS QUADRICOLOR RAPIDS CLUBTAIL L 10 to 20 1 1 0 NoGOMPHUS VENTRICOSUS SKILLET CLUBTAIL W 5 to 10 0 0 0 NoHEMARIS GRACILIS GRACEFUL CLEARWING R 30 3 0 0 NoHEMILEUCA MAIA MAIA COASTAL BARRENS BUCKMOTH L 10 to 20 3 2 2 NoHEMILEUCA MAIA SSP 3 INLAND BARRENS BUCKMOTH R 30 5 5 5 NoHEMILEUCA SP2 SCHWEITZER'S BUCKMOTH P N/A 0 0 0 NoITAME SP 1 BARRENS ITAME (cf I. INEXTRICATA) L 10 to 20 3 2 2 NoLAMPSILIS CARIOSA YELLOW LAMPMUSSEL L/W 10 24 3 3 NoLANTHUS PARVULUS NORTHERN PYGMY CLUBTAIL L 10 to 20 0 0 0 NoLASMIGONA SUBVIRIDIS GREEN FLOATER W 5 to 10 3 0 0 NoLORDITHON NIGER BLACK LORDITHON ROVE BEETLE R 20 1 1 1 NoLYCAEIDES MELISSA SAMUELIS KARNER BLUE W 5 to 10 95 50 50 YesMETARRANTHIS APICIARIA BARRENS METARRANTHIS MOTH R/L 20 to 30 2 0 0 NoMETARRANTHIS PILOSARIA COASTAL SWAMP METARRANTHIS L 10 to 20 3 2 2 NoOPHIOGOMPHUS ANOMALUS EXTRA-STRIPED SNAKETAIL L/W 10 8 8 8 NoOPHIOGOMPHUS ASPERSUS BROOK SNAKETAIL W 5 to 10 6 4 3 NoOPHIOGOMPHUS HOWEI PYGMY SNAKETAIL L/W 10 9 9 9 NoPOLYCELIS REMOTA SUNDERLAND SPRING PLANARIAN R 20 2 0 0 NoPSECTRAGLAEA CARNOSA PINK SALLOW L 10 to 20 0 0 0 NoPYRGUS WYANDOT SOUTHERN GRIZZLED SKIPPER L 10 to 20 0 0 0 NoSOMATOCHLORAR GEORGIANA COPPERY EMERALD W 5 to 10 0 0 0 NoSOMATOCHLORA INCURVATA INCURVATE EMERALD L 10 to 20 0 0 0 NoSPEYERIA IDALIA REGAL FRITILLARY L 10 to 20 5 0 0 NoSPHALLOPLANA PRICEI REFTON CAVE PLANARIAN L 10 to 20 1 1 0 NoSPONGILLA ASPINOSA SMOOTH BRANCHED SPONGE L 10 to 20 0 0 0 NoSTYGOBROMUS BOREALIS TACONIC CAVE AMPHIPOD R 30 0 0 0 NoSTYGOBROMUS HAYI HAY'S SPRING AMPHIPOD R 20 2 2 2 NoSTYGOBROMUS KENKI ROCK CREEK GROUNDWATER AMPHIPOD R 20 2 2 2 NoSTYGOBROMUS PIZZINII PIZZINI'S CAVE AMPHIPOD L 10 to 20 9 3 1 NoSTYGOBROMUS TENUIS TENUIS PIEDMONT GROUNDWATER AMPHIPOD R 30 4 1 1 NoSTYLURUS AMNICOLA RIVERINE CLUBTAIL W 5 to 10 0 0 0 NoSTYLURUS SCUDDERI ZEBRA CLUBTAIL P 5 to 10 1 0 0 NoWILLIAMSONIA FLETCHERI EBONY BOGHAUNTER W 5 to 10 9 9 9 YesWILLIAMSONIA LINTNERI RINGED BOGHAUNTER L/W 10 35 21 21 YesZALE CUREMA A NOCTUID MOTH R 30 7 4 4 NoZALE SP 1 PINE BARRENS ZALE R 30 4 3 3 NoGrand Total 420 223 213 7 Yes50 No9/20/2000 CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT 1 of 1
Page 1 and 2:
Lower New England - Northern Piedmo
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSCOVERINTRODUCTIONA
Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionEcoregional Planning in
Page 7 and 8:
AcknowledgementsEdited Version and
Page 9 and 10:
combinations based on surficial geo
Page 11 and 12:
Priorities and Leadership Assignmen
Page 13 and 14:
Portfolio SummaryA total of 1,028 s
Page 15 and 16:
each local population with respect
Page 17 and 18:
potential target list for future co
Page 19 and 20:
iteration ecoregional plans, specie
Page 21 and 22:
RESULTS FOR SPECIES *Modification t
Page 23 and 24:
documented in BCD making analysis v
Page 25 and 26:
PLANNING METHODS FOR ECOREGIONAL TA
Page 27 and 28:
sandy outwash and forested swamps a
Page 29 and 30:
and distribution pattern for each e
Page 31 and 32:
disproportionately large percentage
Page 33 and 34:
to that ecoregion alone. Those syst
Page 35 and 36:
Locating examples of patch-forming
Page 37 and 38:
systems. Conversely, high elevation
Page 39 and 40:
The minimum goals based on generic
Page 41 and 42:
Results for Terrestrial Communities
Page 43 and 44:
Table 6. Minimum conservation bench
Page 45 and 46:
• The National Vegetation Classif
Page 47 and 48:
of ecoregions, from the Northern Ap
Page 49 and 50:
How much larger than the severe dam
Page 51 and 52:
Scaling factors for Matrix Forest S
Page 53 and 54:
Roads are also source areas for noi
Page 55 and 56:
ungulates. We simply discussed thes
Page 57 and 58:
conservation plan must be done to r
Page 59 and 60:
position, its geology and its eleva
Page 61 and 62:
this block, miles of streams, dams
Page 63 and 64:
Connecting Area or Ecological Backd
Page 65 and 66:
MATRIX SITE:NAME:STATE/S:SIZE:Total
Page 67 and 68:
Block developmentTwo sets of ecoblo
Page 69 and 70:
Table 12. A description of the elev
Page 71 and 72:
There are 27 ELU types entirely mis
Page 73 and 74:
Freshwater Ecoregions and Ecologica
Page 75 and 76:
classes: size 1) headwaters to smal
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 2: Watershed Aquatic System
Page 79 and 80:
targets should also include conside
Page 81 and 82:
have also not been extensively rese
Page 83 and 84:
Table 5: Confidence Code1 High Conf
Page 85 and 86:
TYPECHARACTERISTICSELU signatureSIZ
Page 87 and 88:
Midreach streamentering large lakes
Page 89 and 90:
Major stresses: Using the following
Page 91 and 92:
Aquatic Systems Results for Lower N
Page 93 and 94:
Figure 1: Ecological Drainage Unit
Page 95 and 96:
IV. MiddleConnecticut3450 sq.mi.Riv
Page 97 and 98:
Table 3: Fish and Mussel Distributi
Page 99 and 100:
merrlowctcapeupctmidct3E-03100Nativ
Page 101 and 102:
Figure 2: Size 2 Watershed SystemsR
Page 103 and 104:
TWINSPAN RelationshipsThe hierarchi
Page 105 and 106:
13 and 14 split from 15-17 primaril
Page 107 and 108:
Table 5: Size 2 Watershed System Su
Page 109 and 110:
Table 6: Size 3 Watershed System Su
Page 111 and 112:
Figure 7: Reach Gradient ClassesREV
Page 113 and 114:
Of these 480 possible combinations,
Page 115 and 116:
Units supported the distinctiveness
Page 117 and 118:
Condition ResultsGIS ScreeningSize
Page 119 and 120:
Size 2 Watershed: Landscape Context
Page 121 and 122: Table 10: Size 2 Watershed Landscap
Page 123 and 124: Table 16: Dams on Size 2, 3,4 River
Page 125 and 126: Most of the dams in the analysis re
Page 127 and 128: shallow water fish spawning grounds
Page 129 and 130: Figure 11: Aquatic PortfolioREVISED
Page 131 and 132: Table 19: Size 3 Watershed System T
Page 133 and 134: Table 21: Portfolio Examples by EDU
Page 135 and 136: Range in Landscape Context Ranking
Page 137 and 138: Table 25: Upper Connecticut Portfol
Page 139 and 140: Table 27: Portfolio Size 2-4 Exampl
Page 141 and 142: 2_24 S2c Assabet River 5.45 18.03 S
Page 143 and 144: For the medium to large sized river
Page 145 and 146: tributaries of the Assonet, Namaske
Page 147 and 148: Threats AssessmentThe Core Team mad
Page 149 and 150: • Work with TNC Eastern Conservat
Page 151 and 152: GlossaryThese selective glossary en
Page 153 and 154: Ecological Land Unit (ELU):Mapping
Page 155 and 156: Integration: A portfolio assembly p
Page 157 and 158: Representativeness: Captures multip
Page 159 and 160: Appendix 1Lower New England/Norther
Page 165 and 166: KEY TO TERMS OF FEDERALLY LISTED SP
Page 171: Appendix 1.Lower New England/Northe
Page 175 and 176: Appendix 1Lower New England\Norther
Page 187 and 188: Appendix 4.Lower New England\Northe
Page 197 and 198: DRAFT LNE-NP Ecoregional Plan 9\20\
Page 199 and 200: BibiliographyLower New England GIS
Page 201 and 202: BibiliographyD.P. (compilers), 1994
Page 203 and 204: Bailey, R.G., P.E. Avers, T. King,
Page 205 and 206: Gerritsen, J., M.T. Barbour, and K.
Page 207 and 208: Leopold, L.B. and Wolman, M.G. 1957
Page 209 and 210: Pulliam, H.R., 1988. Sources, sinks
Page 211 and 212: Steedman, R.J. 1988. Modification a
show all

Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?