Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Lower New England/Northern Piedmont EcoregionPrimary Invertebrate Target SpeciesViability and Subsection DistributionAppendix 1SUBSECTION #221Ae221Ae Total221Af221Af Total221Ag221Ag Total221Ah221Ah Total221Ai221Ai Total221Al221Al Total221Am221Am Total221Ba221Ba Total221BbGNAME VIABILITY Y N M Y N M Y N M Y N M Y N M Y N M Y N M Y N Y M Y N M Y N M Y N Y N Y N M Y N M M Y N M Y Y N YACRONICTA ALBARUFA 1 1 1ALASMIDONTA HETERODON 1 5 6 1 1 1 1 10 2 12 1 1 2 22ALASMIDONTA VARICOSA 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 6 11 17 3 1 4 1 1 2 1 10 11 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 4 7 56AMPHIPOEA EREPTA RYENSIS 1 1 1CAECIDOTEA PRICEI 1 1 2 2 5 9 10CALEPHELIS BOREALIS 5 5 2 5 1 8 13CALLOPHRYS IRUS 2 7 9 2 3 5 1 1 11 3 14 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 33CATOCALA HERODIAS GERHARDI 0CATOCALA PRETIOSA PRETIOSA 0CHAETAGLAEA CERATA 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 4CICINDELA ANCOCISCONENSIS 1 1 1CICINDELA MARGINIPENNIS 8 1 9 9CICINDELA PURITANA 1 3 2 6 6CINCINNATIA WINKLEYI 0CRANGONYX ABERRANS 0CRANGONYX DEAROLFI 1 1 1ENALLAGMA PICTUM 0ENALLAGMA RECURVATUM 1 6 7 7ERYNNIS PERSIUS PERSIUS 1 1 1 2 1 4 5EULIMNADIA STONINGTONENSIS 1 1 1FONTIGENS BOTTIMERI 3 3 3GOMPHUS QUADRICOLOR 1 1 1GOMPHUS VENTRICOSUS 0HEMARIS GRACILIS 3 3 3HEMILEUCA MAIA MAIA 1 2 3 3HEMILEUCA MAIA SSP 3 2 2 3 3 5HEMILEUCA SP 2 0ITAME SP 1 1 1 2 1 1 3LAMPSILIS CARIOSA 2 2 1 1 2 13 2 3 18 1 1 2 24LANTHUS PARVULUS 0LASMIGONA SUBVIRIDIS 2 2 1 1 3LORDITHON NIGER 1 1 1LYCAEIDES MELISSA SAMUELIS 2 1 3 38 50 4 92 95METARRANTHIS APICIARIA 1 1 2 2METARRANTHIS PILOSARIA 1 2 3 3OPHIOGOMPHUS ANOMALUS 1 1 6 6 1 1 8OPHIOGOMPHUS ASPERSUS 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 6OPHIOGOMPHUS HOWEI 8 8 1 1 9POLYCELIS REMOTA 2 2 2PSECTRAGLAEA CARNOSA 0PYRGUS WYANDOT 0SOMATOCHLORA GEORGIANA 0SOMATOCHLORA INCURVATA 0SPEYERIA IDALIA 1 1 4 4 5SPHALLOPLANA PRICEI 1 1 1STYGOBROMUS BOREALIS 0STYGOBROMUS HAYI 2 2 2STYGOBROMUS KENKI 2 2 2STYGOBROMUS PIZZINII 3 3 6 2 1 3 9STYGOBROMUS TENUIS TENUIS 1 1 2 2 2 4STYLURUS AMNICOLOR 0STYLURUS SCUDDERI 1 1 1WILLIAMSONIA FLETCHERI 4 4 4 4 1 1 9WILLIAMSONIA LINTNERI 4 13 4 21 1 1 2 5 5 10 1 1 1 1 35ZALE CUREMA 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 7ZALE SP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4Grand Total 7 1 8 5 4 9 18 11 37 6 54 2 1 1 4 14 21 17 52 2 26 1 29 3 2 1 6 3 9 1 13 1 1 39 67 7 113 22 8 20 50 4 11 9 24 18 4 22 2 2 4 1 1 3 5 2 2 1 3 4 8 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 420221Bb Total221Bc221Bc Total221Da221Da Total221Db221Db Total212Dc TotalM212BbM212Bb TotalM212BcM212Bc TotalM212BdM212Bd TotalM212CbM212Cb TotalM212CcM212Cc Total221Ad*221Ad Total*221Ak*221Ak Total*232Ac*232Ac Total*M212De*M212De Total*Grand Totalof All EOs9/20/2000CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT*Targets in subsections adjacent to LNE-NP ecoregion. Page 1 of 1
Appendix 1.Lower New England/Northern Piedmont EcoregionPrimary Plant Target SpeciesViability and Subsection DistributionSUBSECTION #221Ae221Ae Total221Af221Af Total221Ag221Ag Total221Ah221Ah Total221Ai221Ai Total221Al221Al Total221Am221Am Total221BaGNAME VIABILITY M Y N M Y N Y N Y M Y N M Y N Y N M Y N Y Y N M Y M Y N M Y N M Y Y N Y N M Y N Y NAGALINIS ACUTA 2 2 1 1 3AGALINIS AURICULATA 1 1 1 1 2ARABIS PATENS 1 1 1ASTER DEPAUPERATUS 1 14 7 22 22ASTRAGALUS ROBBINSII VAR JESUPII 3 3 3BIDENS BIDENTOIDES 3 3 6 13 8 21 27BIDENS EATONII 2 2 2CARDAMINE LONGII 3 1 4 2 1 3 7CAREX BARRATTII 2 2 2CAREX LUPULIFORMIS 5 2 7 1 1 1 3 2 1 3 2 2 15CAREX POLYMORPHA 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 7CAREX SCHWEINITZII 1 1 2 3 7 4 14 16CAREX WIEGANDII 1 1 1CERASTIUM ARVENSE VAR VILLOSISSIMUM 1 1 1COREOPSIS ROSEA 1 4 5 5CYNOGLOSSUM VIRGINIANUM VAR BOREALE 1 1 1CYPRIPEDIUM ARIETINUM 1 1 3 1 4 1 1 6ECHINODORUS PARVULUS 1 1 1ERIOCAULON PARKERI 2 2 2EUPHORBIA PURPUREA 1 3 4 4HASTEOLA SUAVEOLENS 4 4 8 8HELONIAS BULLATA 1 1 1 1 1 1 3HYPERICUM ADPRESSUM 1 1 1ISOTRIA EATONII 0ISOTRIA MEDEOLOIDES 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 5 12 17 2 11 35 48 1 1 2 74LIATRIS SCARIOSA VAR NOVAE-ANGLIAE 4 1 5 2 2 2 3 5 12MALAXIS BAYARDII 1 1 1PHACELIA COVILLEI 5 2 7 7POA PALUDIGENA 1 1 2 1 1 5 5 1 1 9POLEMONIUM VANBRUNTIAE 1 1 2 2POTAMOGETON CONFERVOIDES 1 1 2 2 1 1 4POTAMOGETON HILLII 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 6 15 20POTAMOGETON OGDENII 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5PYCNANTHEMUM CLINOPODIOIDES 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 6PYCNANTHEMUM TORREI 2 2 1 1 3 2 5 1 1 1 3 11RUBUS ORARIUS 1 1 1SCIRPUS ANCISTROCHAETUS 1 1 2 5 7 1 1 2 4 1 5 15SCIRPUS LONGII 1 1 2 8 1 9 11SCLERIA RETICULARIS 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 7SIDA HERMAPHRODITA 3 3 1 7 7TRICHOMANES INTRICATUM 1 1 1 1 2VITIS RUPESTRIS 1 1 2 2Grand Total 1 17 12 30 1 5 4 10 10 10 20 2 2 2 8 17 27 4 22 37 63 3 3 6 1 5 4 10 3 3 20 11 31 1 7 8 6 42 19 67 1 2 2 5 2 10 12 1 1 2 1 1 2 4 17 11 32 4 2 6 336221Ba Total221Bb221Bb Total221Bc221Bc Total221Da221Da Total221Db221Db Total221Dc221Dc TotalM212BbM212Bb TotalM212BcM212Bc TotalM212BdM212Bd TotalM212CbM212Cb TotalM212CcM212Cc TotalGrand Total of All EOs9/20/2000 CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT Page 1 of 1
Page 1 and 2:
Lower New England - Northern Piedmo
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSCOVERINTRODUCTIONA
Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionEcoregional Planning in
Page 7 and 8:
AcknowledgementsEdited Version and
Page 9 and 10:
combinations based on surficial geo
Page 11 and 12:
Priorities and Leadership Assignmen
Page 13 and 14:
Portfolio SummaryA total of 1,028 s
Page 15 and 16:
each local population with respect
Page 17 and 18:
potential target list for future co
Page 19 and 20:
iteration ecoregional plans, specie
Page 21 and 22:
RESULTS FOR SPECIES *Modification t
Page 23 and 24:
documented in BCD making analysis v
Page 25 and 26:
PLANNING METHODS FOR ECOREGIONAL TA
Page 27 and 28:
sandy outwash and forested swamps a
Page 29 and 30:
and distribution pattern for each e
Page 31 and 32:
disproportionately large percentage
Page 33 and 34:
to that ecoregion alone. Those syst
Page 35 and 36:
Locating examples of patch-forming
Page 37 and 38:
systems. Conversely, high elevation
Page 39 and 40:
The minimum goals based on generic
Page 41 and 42:
Results for Terrestrial Communities
Page 43 and 44:
Table 6. Minimum conservation bench
Page 45 and 46:
• The National Vegetation Classif
Page 47 and 48:
of ecoregions, from the Northern Ap
Page 49 and 50:
How much larger than the severe dam
Page 51 and 52:
Scaling factors for Matrix Forest S
Page 53 and 54:
Roads are also source areas for noi
Page 55 and 56:
ungulates. We simply discussed thes
Page 57 and 58:
conservation plan must be done to r
Page 59 and 60:
position, its geology and its eleva
Page 61 and 62:
this block, miles of streams, dams
Page 63 and 64:
Connecting Area or Ecological Backd
Page 65 and 66:
MATRIX SITE:NAME:STATE/S:SIZE:Total
Page 67 and 68:
Block developmentTwo sets of ecoblo
Page 69 and 70:
Table 12. A description of the elev
Page 71 and 72:
There are 27 ELU types entirely mis
Page 73 and 74:
Freshwater Ecoregions and Ecologica
Page 75 and 76:
classes: size 1) headwaters to smal
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 2: Watershed Aquatic System
Page 79 and 80:
targets should also include conside
Page 81 and 82:
have also not been extensively rese
Page 83 and 84:
Table 5: Confidence Code1 High Conf
Page 85 and 86:
TYPECHARACTERISTICSELU signatureSIZ
Page 87 and 88:
Midreach streamentering large lakes
Page 89 and 90:
Major stresses: Using the following
Page 91 and 92:
Aquatic Systems Results for Lower N
Page 93 and 94:
Figure 1: Ecological Drainage Unit
Page 95 and 96:
IV. MiddleConnecticut3450 sq.mi.Riv
Page 97 and 98:
Table 3: Fish and Mussel Distributi
Page 99 and 100:
merrlowctcapeupctmidct3E-03100Nativ
Page 101 and 102:
Figure 2: Size 2 Watershed SystemsR
Page 103 and 104:
TWINSPAN RelationshipsThe hierarchi
Page 105 and 106:
13 and 14 split from 15-17 primaril
Page 107 and 108:
Table 5: Size 2 Watershed System Su
Page 109 and 110:
Table 6: Size 3 Watershed System Su
Page 111 and 112:
Figure 7: Reach Gradient ClassesREV
Page 113 and 114:
Of these 480 possible combinations,
Page 115 and 116:
Units supported the distinctiveness
Page 117 and 118:
Condition ResultsGIS ScreeningSize
Page 119 and 120: Size 2 Watershed: Landscape Context
Page 121 and 122: Table 10: Size 2 Watershed Landscap
Page 123 and 124: Table 16: Dams on Size 2, 3,4 River
Page 125 and 126: Most of the dams in the analysis re
Page 127 and 128: shallow water fish spawning grounds
Page 129 and 130: Figure 11: Aquatic PortfolioREVISED
Page 131 and 132: Table 19: Size 3 Watershed System T
Page 133 and 134: Table 21: Portfolio Examples by EDU
Page 135 and 136: Range in Landscape Context Ranking
Page 137 and 138: Table 25: Upper Connecticut Portfol
Page 139 and 140: Table 27: Portfolio Size 2-4 Exampl
Page 141 and 142: 2_24 S2c Assabet River 5.45 18.03 S
Page 143 and 144: For the medium to large sized river
Page 145 and 146: tributaries of the Assonet, Namaske
Page 147 and 148: Threats AssessmentThe Core Team mad
Page 149 and 150: • Work with TNC Eastern Conservat
Page 151 and 152: GlossaryThese selective glossary en
Page 153 and 154: Ecological Land Unit (ELU):Mapping
Page 155 and 156: Integration: A portfolio assembly p
Page 157 and 158: Representativeness: Captures multip
Page 159 and 160: Appendix 1Lower New England/Norther
Page 165 and 166: KEY TO TERMS OF FEDERALLY LISTED SP
Page 169: Appendix 1Lower New England/Norther
Page 173 and 174: Appendix 1Lower New England\Norther
Page 187 and 188: Appendix 4.Lower New England\Northe
Page 197 and 198: DRAFT LNE-NP Ecoregional Plan 9\20\
Page 199 and 200: BibiliographyLower New England GIS
Page 201 and 202: BibiliographyD.P. (compilers), 1994
Page 203 and 204: Bailey, R.G., P.E. Avers, T. King,
Page 205 and 206: Gerritsen, J., M.T. Barbour, and K.
Page 207 and 208: Leopold, L.B. and Wolman, M.G. 1957
Page 209 and 210: Pulliam, H.R., 1988. Sources, sinks
Page 211 and 212: Steedman, R.J. 1988. Modification a
show all

Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?