Full ecoregional plan - Conservation Gateway

Table 13: Size 2 Watershed Percent Agriculture Ranking by Ecological Drainage Unit andNumber and Percentage of Watersheds# Size 2 Watersheds Falling into each category % of Size 2 Watersheds Falling into each category%Lower Middle Upper Cape Grand %Lower Middle UpperAgricultureCT CT CT Cod Total AgricultureCT CT CTSaco-Merrimack-CharlesSaco-Merrimack-CharlesCapeCodGrandTotal1: 10% 12 37 8 11 2 70 4 20 52 36 33 40 360 0 0 0 0 0Total 61 71 22 33 5 192 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100Dam ImpactsTable14: Dam Total Number and Density by River Size and Ecological Drainage UnitEDU Dam Summary: # and density of dams on each size class river# dams# dams per per 10Total # 10 sq.mi. of miles ofdams watershed riverTotal #dams onsize 1Total #dams onsize 2Total #dams onsize 3Total #dams onsize 4# dams onsize 1rivers per10 milesof river# dams onsize 2rivers per10 miles ofriver# dams onsize 3rivers per10 miles ofriver# dams onsize 4rivers per10 miles ofriverEDUSaco 933 0.96 0.62 710 130 59 34 0.58 0.81 0.85 0.99Lower CT 1480 1.61 1.07 1279 143 48 10 1.11 1.05 0.84 0.30Middle CT 363 1.05 0.69 282 40 29 12 0.65 1.18 1.84 0.30Cape 152 1.31 1.52 147 5 1.60 0.58Upper CT 176 0.38 0.39 129 24 17 6 0.36 0.45 0.75 0.43Grand Total 3104 1.10 0.79 2547 342 153 62 0.78 0.87 0.93 0.51Table 15: Dams by Type and Size within Ecological Drainage UnitsEDU Dam Summary: Percentage of Dams within Summary Type and Size Categories% >15%% 50Total # % HYDRO % FLOOD WATER %% feet